Property fiasco

We all know a property drama is on the way

I know people who have had second marraiges and have step kids

The first thing is cousin brothers have no right over business or a person propert. Nor his kids or wife brothers actually. Or every cousin would claim a parents brother or sisters property. Thats not allowed

Anuj kapadia property is ancestrol made by his father. Only anuj kapadia and his sister Malvika can have rights on that than their kids (adopted and birth step)

By kids i mean step son or step daughter cannot claim ancestral property. Samar and pakhi and toshu are not blood relatives or adopted kids of anuj kapadia have rights. That is why sometimes step kids are adopted by step father to give property rights. They are only related to anupama.

Only anuj kapadia and Mukku blood kids can get direct rights even if anuj or Mukku do not leave will. Even if anuj dad has not left a will. Anuj kapadia cannot give his ancestrol property to anupama or Shahs. I know because even wife of sons or husband of daughter cannot claim ancestral property. I have seen such cases in real life.

Next we come to business of anuj kapadia. Although anuj kapadia father started business and anuj made it very rich yet anuj is not sole owner of his business. Because you can look at tata and birlas etc. JRD tata started business but ratan tata took it to heights. Does that mean his younger brother has no rights on that or his father who did not work much for tatas. Nooo the business all kids have equal rights irrespective of contribution.

Here anuj father is dead so next he had two kids so anuj kapadia gets 50% shares and Mukku gets 50% shares. Next gen if anuj has one child she gets anuj shares not Mukkus shares. Mukku should write in will that my 50% goes to anuj born kids since i have no kids or whatever. That is how business also is shared among family members.That is only after Mukku death anupama and anuj kids will get her shares if no claimants not now.

Again a wife cannot claim business rights(or all business husbands would give 100% or 50% rights to wife and hungama would occur in big business houses). If Mukku or her kids put case for giving anupama 100% rights anuj will be in trouble. This is because many cases have happened girls marry a hubby and transfer property to their first hubby or mayka etc Hence court has given equal rights to daughter and a son in property and business. Until and unless they do not hand over all with will to brothers like Mukku did.

Yet in future her kids can stake claim saying they disagree with Mukku and want 50% back. This also happens. After 20 years Mukku or her kids can come and claim 50% shares in property or business later saying they have rights on it basically. Read priyamvada Birla case or many other cases on this issue. First claim is on blood kids and blood grand kids or adopted kids. Step kids or half kids(like samar etc are) have no rights on anuj kapadia business or propertys

A wife has right on property that her husband makes after marraige not on ancestrol property actually because it belongs to all kids. Anuj kapadia writing his dad property is completely wrong because Mukku gets 50% actually and anuj 50% he can only write his 50%. Only after Mukku death and no claimants he can write 100% to his wife if he has no kids.

From all these rules as far as i see let adhik marry pakhi yet both have no rights on anuj kapaida house or business

Let samar marry sara yet both have no rights on anuj business or property

Only anuj and malvika blood kids or adopted have rights on everything irrespective of what he gives to anupama 100% or 1000%

In story anupama has been given 100% rights because they want to kill anuj kapadia and she may give to pakhi saamar toshu and little anu equally property and business to make them rich enough. To do this only its given 100% everything to anupama. But law does not allow, anuj may be blind in anupama love law is not. If Mukku or her kids file a case anupama and shahs and barkha etc will all be in trouble. I have seen that happen in some family property dispute where one wife gets all rights than court scaps the will after death of husband too. Ideally anuj should give signing authority to mukku, anuj himself and anupama after his death (not now) as gaurdian of littl anu. Thats what all do. Or mayka walas (ex sasural wala) will kabza all property of wifes husband and their kids. Which will happen here in future

From what i see adhik and barkha are too negative ankush has no say they will marry pakhi and snatch it from anupama and anuj kapadia. Vanraj Shah will join barkah and adhik in this. Pakhi and sara will turn negative in future and join Sghahs may be in plan. Pakhi has no rights on anuj property or business yet a man can write his business to whoever he wants. So anuj/anupama may be forced by adhik to write 100% to adhik to marry pakhi she may get pregnant before wedding or something.

Anuj should have thought allthis and given signing property to Malvika and GK rather than anupama. Theyboth are mature and capable to handle barkha adhik or shahs.

Court has divide category A, B, c, D and so on

So if person died without making will then court first give priority to A Fe fecatorgery like parents children wife

If none of A catorgery avalabe then court give priority to B catorgery

Then if B catorgery are not available then court give priority to C

Samar pakhi and toshu ia not blood children of anuj but they are blood children of anupama since anuuj has transfer property in name of anupama then children of anupama can claim on anupama property if anupama died with out making will

Though it her children will not

In sreemoye after rohit death sreemoye give her all property to cancer patients and went to serve old people in old age home

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Court has divide category A, B, c, D and so on

So if person died without making will then court first give priority to A Fe fecatorgery like parents children wife

If none of A catorgery avalabe then court give priority to B catorgery

Then if B catorgery are not available then court give priority to C

Samar pakhi and toshu ia not blood children of anuj but they are blood children of anupama since anuuj has transfer property in name of anupama then children of anupama can claim on anupama property if anupama died with out making will

Though it her children will not

In sreemoye after rohit death sreemoye give her all property to cancer patients and went to serve old people in old age home

That is trick here

Mukku is still alive and blood daighter of anuj kapadia parents. She may marry and have kids too in future. But here anuj is acting as if shes dead and has no rights at all.

So anuj cannot truly give 100% to anupama actually

Nor can barkha and her kids have any claim

if anupama dies than mukku and her kids will come and claim all property or atleast 100% as they get first right over it (as no more blood relatives)

Such case has happened in my vicinity where brother wrote 100% property to his wife and she had no kids but she gave to first hubby and his kids. But court rejected and said cannot give as blood child and her kids get first rights and sole rights. If they are not alive or do not want 1 re of property than anupama kids or barkha kids etc will come later

After priyamvada birla property fiasco court is very strict on such issues

What anuj did others tried but than if mukku or her related kids etc come anupama kids claim will fall flat than or barkha kids

These ppl are day dreaming without any rights to get anuj ancestral property and business etc

They are very far off claimants like 3rd or 4th claimants not first or second

First is Mukku and anuj

Second is mukku and anuj own blood or adopted kids

Third is anuj cousin kids(as blood) like sara only not barkha brother

Fourth is anupama blood kids

That is how property gets decided

Business is decided by share holders if they do not like shahs or barkah kids they can vote and get them them out of broard. In business i think anuj and mukku has more rights as 50% shares both have

I feel adhrik will marry pakhi trouble her and make anupama sign 100% to his name that may happen

To avoid such issues only before emperor and kings married within family

Like mughals or rajpuths, like raja man singh married his first cousin, prince salim married first cousin, shah jahan married first cousin (all mothers brother or sisters daughters) this to avoid property and throne fights only or outside claimants

But in 21st century i have never heard first and second cousins marry at all - they are also brothers and sisters

Ideally sara is second cousin sister to samar and pakhi so i am confused how samar can love her

But adhik is not related by blood to anuj kapadia so he can marry pakhi

Setting aside the rights and wrongs of what Anuj has chosen to do, there is one point I want to make. If Malvika has chosen to give up her rights on the ancestral property, and has written a legally binding letter saying so, Anuj will be seen as sole owner in a court of law.

Just to add to this, a company can never be willed away like property. You will have share holders and boards to answer to. Even if you have the controlling share %, you cannot just hand over your company to some random relative. Not only can the board stop you, its also against business rules and ethics and illegal in court

Apriyavada she has already made will before her death so her children can't ki claimanything अगर kisi ki self accqurired property hai to woh apni self accqurired property agar kisi ke bhi naam kare to usme uske bacche began khuch nahi kar sakte. Self accqurired property ka, owner ko poora, right hai kisje ke naam property karnaInis

AIf it s anuj self accqurired property means if he get as gift from his parents then anuj apni self accqurired property kisi ke bhi naam kar sakbache ai

Mukkiu chacha chachi bache anupama ke bach isme khuch nahi kar saktr

Claim tabhi bota hai if owner of property died without making will

To jub without will property pe claim hota hai to court sabse pehle A type ke logon ko preference deti

Bache biwi parents ka first right hota, hai claim karna ka if owner of property died without making will

But yes jaise iwsme dikhate है कि सी ने भी computer typing se will banaya और aram अपने naam property kara liya

First of all jo will banti है it should be hand written not compute typing.

Hand written yeh propof hita है कि owner ne apni marji se will banayi hai means khud will banayi hai

By god! Muze to samjh hi nhi aata.. Adhik ka kya haq banta hai Anuj k property me hisse ka😂 even in joint families this does not happen! Kuchh bhi dikhate ITV wale 🤯

Originally posted by: fan_fiction123

By god! Muze to samjh hi nhi aata.. Adhik ka kya haq banta hai Anuj k property me hisse ka😂 even in joint families this does not happen! Kuchh bhi dikhate ITV wale 🤯

if he marries pakhi he will become anuj son in law as per barkha i guess

as per barkha adhik is like her son so anujs nephew too like sara

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Apriyavada she has already made will before her death so her children can't ki claimanything अगर kisi ki self accqurired property hai to woh apni self accqurired property agar kisi ke bhi naam kare to usme uske bacche began khuch nahi kar sakte. Self accqurired property ka, owner ko poora, right hai kisje ke naam property karnaInis

AIf it s anuj self accqurired property means if he get as gift from his parents then anuj apni self accqurired property kisi ke bhi naam kar sakbache ai

Mukkiu chacha chachi bache anupama ke bach isme khuch nahi kar saktr

Claim tabhi bota hai if owner of property died without making will

To jub without will property pe claim hota hai to court sabse pehle A type ke logon ko preference deti

Bache biwi parents ka first right hota, hai claim karna ka if owner of property died without making will

Its not anuj self acquired house

its built by anuj dad so ancestrol property

its again like tata/birla company all kids/grand kids of anujs father have equal rights on it

share holders too have a say

will any share holder be ready to have uneducated 10th pass anupama as owner and signing authority first of all - never

because they want their shares price to increase with educated capable human as signing authority not an un educated anupama in todays times

anuj may worship anupama as goddess and give her everything

share holders do not think like that

imagine tomorrow infosys or wipro is handed to 10th pass lady who will listen or obey them

all are highly qualified in companes nowadays they will listen only if owner or CEO highly educated and capable

not ppl like anupama

anuj should have made mukku and anupama and anuj all three equal partners in signing

this is not doll game handling companies that you give to anyone whose not qualified cannot even read english or speak english to clients or employees

anupama will sign anywhere and not understand anything written in agreements and cause legal issues to company

even if anuj dies its only mukku who has education and capability to handle without others snatching it from kapadia s not anupama