YRKKH BTS, SM updates and Spoilers Thread! #120 - Page 10

Remember when armaan seperated daksh from ruhi to please abhira.

Then he was defended strongly even hailed as best husband.

Now when he did the same with abhira, people (except his blind bakths) calling out him.

Because ruhi is side character while abhira is lead.

So yeah lead characters get away with things mostly because they are leads.

Imagine armaan abhira doing things the way Geetanjali Anshuman doing right now they would have got hailed as understanding partner and selfless mother.

Since they are side characters they are getting hate.

Originally posted by: nivedha_123

Realization will happen for sure even if you dont like it and he has to make amends for sure. Whether people accepting it or not is a different thing. Calling out a character is good but you cannot control the future actions of the character just because you hate that character now. He has to do what he needs to do and accepting him back is left to audience.

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

Whatever both Maa and Son do, it doesn't make any sense. Vidya ko andha hone se pehle Armaan ko dekhna hai but husband ko nahi jiske liye uski pehli biwi ki kidnapping karwai. Same Armaan ko uss family ke liye suddenly itna pyaar aa gaya jinke dar se apni bacchi chura ke bhaag gaya.

False engagement bhi kar li but abhi tak pookie ka sach nahi bola Abhira ko. Isko khud ke liye alag wife chahiye aur beti ke liye alag

Samjha karo priority order hai, abhi maa is the priority as she is suffering the most. If she was living happily in PH without throwing Abhira out for being careless mother toh Pookie priority hoti.

Mera aj ka suffering ka quota poora hua. Hope no fictional character was harmed by my opinion

Originally posted by: CanKeepCalm

Exactly, you nailed it. For me, its pure whitewashing now, redemption left the chat long ago. You are cheering for him, I am roasting him, and that is totally fine. Different pov, coexisting like pros.

I’m not cheering for him and no one can do it for him right now. Whitewash or not has to be judged after few months. Redemption is subjective.

What I wanted to convey is judging each and every action of a character in a wrong sense is not the way to watch a Poorly WRITTEN fiction show

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

It is leads who gets praise and appreciation mostly. It is leads whose characters are important in a show. So obviously their actions generate more attention.

There is a difference between side character wronging fl and ml "who is supposed to love fl" wronging fl.

Vidya, kaveri, ruhi are not the ones who promised love vaadas to abhira.

Infact being leads gives them leverage to get more chances.

Imagine a side character doing things to abhira what armaan did.

When kaveri, vidya, ruhi were doing kaands, not a single soul said we are waiting for their redemption, it is just fiction. Everyone bashed them without any excuses.

Kaira also got bashed for being doormat.

Abhir got bashed for being a cheater.

They never got defended with "we are waiting for their redemption because it is fiction" line.

Agree completely. But I still want to know - who has not bashed Armaan or called out his actions? The leads actions are more scrutinized & bashed on the show and off it as well. Leads actually face consequences for the actions unlike side characters. So yeah, no one is saying either of the leads is right. They both made their fair share of mistakes, Armaan more than Abhira or anyone else. The point is that when he makes mistakes if he is being called out, then why when he wants to make amends is that also being bashed rather than acknowledged? In this case of tomorrow he tells the truth to Abhira and che chooses to accept him after that, both will be bashed. Why? Because according to some people his actions are "irredeemable"? Who is anyone to decide that?

Originally posted by: nivedha_123

I’m not cheering for him and no one can do it for him right now. Whitewash or not has to be judged after few months. Redemption is subjective.

What I wanted to convey is judging each and every action of a character in a wrong sense is not the way to watch a Poorly WRITTEN fiction show

Originally posted by: Apsvenky

Agree completely. But I still want to know - who has not bashed Armaan or called out his actions? The leads actions are more scrutinized & bashed on the show and off it as well. Leads actually face consequences for the actions unlike side characters. So yeah, no one is saying either of the leads is right. They both made their fair share of mistakes, Armaan more than Abhira or anyone else. The point is that when he makes mistakes if he is being called out, then why when he wants to make amends is that also being bashed rather than acknowledged? In this case of tomorrow he tells the truth to Abhira and che chooses to accept him after that, both will be bashed. Why? Because according to some people his actions are "irredeemable"? Who is anyone to decide that?

What consequences armaan faced for all his previous kaands? Don't say him saying sorry to abhira is his consequences.

Honestly what armaan doing right now is making amends that needs acknowledgement? How ? By still not telling maira truth to abhira and by still being engaged to Geetanjali?

Yes armaan's actions are irredeemable just like how vidya and kaveri actions were.

Why people had so much problem with abhira ruhi behen bond before surrogacy.

Didn't that bond got trolled by people despite abhira accepting ruhi as her behen.

Same for vidya, kaveri.

Why vidya, kaveri are not being hailed & acknowledged despite being with abhira for 7 years. They are still getting bashed. Because their actions are irredeemable? Who are we to decide that no.

Just because abhira accepts other characters abusive behaviour doesn't mean viewers too should feel the same.

If one want to hail armaan's nth redemption. Do it. But why expecting others to not call out a character who clearly did many wrong things.

Originally posted by: nivedha_123

Girl, I love you for this

Finally someone is acknowledging the writers part in the entire khichdi

Inconsistency in writing is the issue and we cannot justify any characters with such gaps in writing.

The point is everyone has right to call out every character and even leads are being called out. I remember when Ruhi was flipped before leap, most of them criticized the writing as well questioning why to flip her after getting her royally white washed (just imagine none of her kaands were called out heck no one even knows about them ) and was hailed to have sorted herself and became the acchi sacchi didi.

Vidya and Kaveri are also called out every time and they also got whitewashed for leap (infact pre leap itself) when they haven't even apologized even once to neither Abhira nor Armaan for what they said and did to them for years. Post leap, they are being hailed as the best support for Abhira (when in actual they were shown to be Abhira's biggest road block blocking her professional progression) just because they stayed with her under same roof for 7yrs, it's another thing that Abhira was shown to be hiding both her physical and mental pain from them

Armaan and even Abhira are called out in every track when they committed mistakes/crimes, even now no one is hailing Armaan.

Even if most of the them don't want to see him on screen, until TRP audience reject his presence, it's not going to happen. Unfortunately, Armaan is still the male lead of the show even if majority wants him gone or replace him

If Armaan sees a stick in a scene, he will be bashed left right center because apparently as per some people he wants Ab to do pole dancing to satisfy his lust.

This behaviour is definitely not calling out a character. This is blind hatred. Would Appreciate if difference is accepted

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

Remember when armaan seperated daksh from ruhi to please abhira.

Then he was defended strongly even hailed as best husband.

Now when he did the same with abhira, people (except his blind bakths) calling out him.

Because ruhi is side character while abhira is lead.

So yeah lead characters get away with things mostly because they are leads.

Imagine armaan abhira doing things the way Geetanjali Anshuman doing right now they would have got hailed as understanding partner and selfless mother.

Since they are side characters they are getting hate.

I remember Abhira was bashed for supporting EMA of her brother (I myself criticized her), though she was made to do that by writers, to create misunderstanding and forced difference of opinion between Abhimaan. Even then she was heavily criticized and comparisons from previous generations were drawn regarding righteousness of FLs.

Abhira was criticized for sending Vidya mata to jail, it was also a plot twist to create rift between Abhimaan, but comparisons were drawn from real life.

When Abhira kidnapped Daksh she was heavily criticized, same was the case with Armaan's baby swap incident he was brutally bashed, when she left Armaan on knowing BSP's truth she was criticized and few empathized more with Armaan on SM (for me it was their choice as long as they didn't abuse, namecalled or mocked her pain).

Abhir was bashed for filing case against Vidya mata and not caring about her sister's marriage after getting handicapped. Why? Was it the marriage in real life to care about it so much? Divorce is also a plot device. Just the way separating child from one parent for years is.

People can have their opinion specifically if they are not breaking forum rules and code of conduct or if they are merely joking around finding fun even when nothing makes sense, regardless of writer's opinions or plot, specifically when the track is ongoing. I myself think Abhira used to get bashed unnecessarily and I understand it's annoying to see people ranting 24/7 against your favorite character, specifically namecalling, abusing and wishing harm on characters. The way it's moral policing and wrong to criticize people who are supporting Armaan, opinion regarding Armaan shouldn't be bashed like a real person, because writers did it all isn't it same? Most people won't care to criticize fictional characters Armaan or Abhira on daily basis after year or so of their story's closure. Maybe their names will be used as reference like leads of Gen 2 but nothing beyond that.