| First Three Seasons Frustration Thread #2 | [DT Note: pg-65] - Page 26

Originally posted by: janecastle

Abhimanyu is not even equal to Abhinav's toe. Confuse karna toh bahut dur ki baat hai.

@bold- Well that is not impossible. If you have enough money and power, toh kuch bhi ho sakta hai. And knowing Harsh's obsession with doctors, it is more than possible.

You don't seem to know the ground reality. People buy medical seats all the time with their money and power. Then go and treat people. That is not unheard of and nothing new.

And Abhinav bina surname ke gave his son a decent life. Most importantly the said son was alive and well till not Dr Birla's manhoos presence entered their life. Bechare bache ko kha gaya not Dr Birla naam ke panauti.

In the first episode of gen3 itself it was shown that abhimanyu was the topper of the state whose record remain unbroken. Arohi who was obsessed with being number 1 tried to break it but failed to do so by 0.5 marks.

So if he can be the topper of the state whose record is unbroken he does not need harsh Birla to buy him a medical seat.

Apart from that when abhimanyu took akshara to her law exam she mentioned that he is the topper.

Dr. Abhimanyu Birla is a mere human being he does not have any power to control or avoid natural disaster. So he died along with his son in a landslide which killed so many people.

Originally posted by: Mehersudha

i haven't seen any lady doing fast to get more life for her hubby or would be in her pregnancy or early pregnancy taking risk on the kids life that too staying without water 😉 e hi pyar ki nishani which is assumed by a promo to drive next set of audience

https://www.instagram.com/p/CyrpTPtvEvQ/?igsh=MTJobzNtZXpjMXp0ag==

Wasn't Abhimanyu her fiance? She cares for him but i agree it's stupidity to do fast when you are pregnant, but isn't akshara famous for doing stunts?

Yes, Abhira is Akshara & Abhinav's pyar ki nishani, & so was Abhir, pyar ki nishani of Abhimanyu & Akshara.

It makes no sense to discuss whether Akshara loves Abhimanyu or Abhinav because Akshara was madly in love with Abhimanyu but 3-4 months after divorce she married Abhinav & 6 years after marriage she fell deeply in love with Abhinav and consummated their marriage. But unfortunately Abhinav died, and then for Abhir, she decides to marry Abhimanyu because he is still in love with her & abhir wants their marriage. If she can marry a stranger to give a father to her child, then why she can't marry the biological father of her child to give father to both her children.

The only problem in the storyline was showing her moving on after just 3-4 months of Abhinav's death. If she loved abhimanyu and that is why she wanted to marry, it would have still made sense. Manjari was selfish, wanted to abort Abhinav's child but her logic wasn't wrong in the sense she told akshara that she is ready for Abhi-Ra marraige but can she promise her that after marriage akshara will love abhimanyu, but Akshara couldn't promise, she refused because she was still in love with Abhinav.

Which is why she should have waited for 3-4 years after abhinav's death, raised Abhira as a single mother and then shown how akshara & abhimanyu slowly fall in love, the storyline would have made more sense.

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

Wasn't Abhimanyu her fiance? She cares for him but i agree it's stupidity to do fast when you are pregnant, but isn't akshara famous for doing stunts?

Yes, Abhira is Akshara & Abhinav's pyar ki nishani, & so was Abhir, pyar ki nishani of Abhimanyu & Akshara.

It makes no sense to discuss whether Akshara loves Abhimanyu or Abhinav because Akshara was madly in love with Abhimanyu but 3-4 months after divorce she married Abhinav & 6 years after marriage she fell deeply in love with Abhinav and consummated their marriage. But unfortunately Abhinav died, and then for Abhir, she decides to marry Abhimanyu because he is still in love with her & abhir wants their marriage. If she can marry a stranger to give a father to her child, then why she can't marry the biological father of her child to give father to both her children.

The only problem in the storyline was showing her moving on after just 3-4 months of Abhinav's death. If she loved abhimanyu and that is why she wanted to marry, it would have still made sense. Manjari was selfish, wanted to abort Abhinav's child but her logic wasn't wrong in the sense she told akshara that she is ready for Abhi-Ra marraige but can she promise her that after marriage akshara will love abhimanyu, but Akshara couldn't promise, she refused because she was still in love with Abhinav.

Which is why she should have waited for 3-4 years after abhinav's death, raised Abhira as a single mother and then shown how akshara & abhimanyu slowly fall in love, the storyline would have made more sense.

Thats the thing na writer never wanted to go back to abhira,if they had gone logically trp would had been up,but then their claim navra is accepted would come out false ,so their ego would had been hurt which is more important to them

Originally posted by: janecastle

Abheemanyu ke aukad toh khud Dkp ne dikhaya. Chai se makhi jaise udake phek diya. So-called hero's legacy is a jethji obsessed lusty creep Ruhi Birla. Who is hoping for an EMA with BIL just like how Abheemanyu wanted to have an affair with a married woman. What a legacy.

Lol

That was a little harsh but fact is fact

Obsession passed on through genes.

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

Wasn't Abhimanyu her fiance? She cares for him but i agree it's stupidity to do fast when you are pregnant, but isn't akshara famous for doing stunts?

Yes, Abhira is Akshara & Abhinav's pyar ki nishani, & so was Abhir, pyar ki nishani of Abhimanyu & Akshara.

It makes no sense to discuss whether Akshara loves Abhimanyu or Abhinav because Akshara was madly in love with Abhimanyu but 3-4 months after divorce she married Abhinav & 6 years after marriage she fell deeply in love with Abhinav and consummated their marriage. But unfortunately Abhinav died, and then for Abhir, she decides to marry Abhimanyu because he is still in love with her & abhir wants their marriage. If she can marry a stranger to give a father to her child, then why she can't marry the biological father of her child to give father to both her children.

The only problem in the storyline was showing her moving on after just 3-4 months of Abhinav's death. If she loved abhimanyu and that is why she wanted to marry, it would have still made sense. Manjari was selfish, wanted to abort Abhinav's child but her logic wasn't wrong in the sense she told akshara that she is ready for Abhi-Ra marraige but can she promise her that after marriage akshara will love abhimanyu, but Akshara couldn't promise, she refused because she was still in love with Abhinav.

Which is why she should have waited for 3-4 years after abhinav's death, raised Abhira as a single mother and then shown how akshara & abhimanyu slowly fall in love, the storyline would have made more sense.

Originally posted by: sweta2005

Thats the thing na writer never wanted to go back to abhira,if they had gone logically trp would had been up,but then their claim navra is accepted would come out false ,so their ego would had been hurt which is more important to them

If we keep our favourites aside, and just go by the storyline, Akshara going back to Abhimanyu when Abhinav was alive wouldn't have made sense, because that would have made Akshara ungrateful. Also that was the natural progression of the story, Akshnav story looked like a perfect arranged marriage story, when 2 people when they marry feel nothing for each other but if your husband is caring, respectful and treats you well, then you fall in love and the bond becomes very strong.

So, for Abhi-Ra union, the only choice was for Akshara to go to abhimanyu ONLY AFTER Abhinav is no longer alive (because she had fallen for abhinav, so some external force like Abhir wanting Abhi-Ra marraige was needed )

The issue was the time leap, they cannot show in 2 months her moving on with another man but not loving him & refuses to love him even after marriage and only needs him as a father to her children. How is it fair to Abhimanyu ?

Originally posted by: janecastle

Abheemanyu ke aukad toh khud Dkp ne dikhaya. Chai se makhi jaise udake phek diya. So-called hero's legacy is a jethji obsessed lusty creep Ruhi Birla. Who is hoping for an EMA with BIL just like how Abheemanyu wanted to have an affair with a married woman. What a legacy.

Kuch nahi mila toh yehi sahi?!!

😂🤣😂

People who don't forget to remind everyone in forum that Abheera is AkshNav nishani, somehow forget that Ruhi is Neil and Arohi's nishani. 🤣😂🤣

And lusting over sister's love interest was Arohi's trait, not abhi's.

Episodes dekhle pehle before making statements, abhi asked Akshara to come back to him!!! Once she rejected, he never even looked at her with any feelings. It was Mrs Sharma, being a married woman was lusting over abhi, asking him to make jam with her, hugged him tightly, 🤣😂🤣

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

If we keep our favourites aside, and just go by the storyline, Akshara going back to Abhimanyu when Abhinav was alive wouldn't have made sense, because that would have made Akshara ungrateful. Also that was the natural progression of the story, Akshnav story looked like a perfect arranged marriage story, when 2 people when they marry feel nothing for each other but if your husband is caring, respectful and treats you well, then you fall in love and the bond becomes very strong.

So, for Abhi-Ra union, the only choice was for Akshara to go to abhimanyu ONLY AFTER Abhinav is no longer alive (because she had fallen for abhinav, so some external force like Abhir wanting Abhi-Ra marraige was needed )

The issue was the time leap, they cannot show in 2 months her moving on with another man but not loving him & refuses to love him even after marriage and only needs him as a father to her children. How is it fair to Abhimanyu ?

The very purpose of introducing a cameo in the show was to unite the leads. And as per RS cameos role in the show was only for couple of months and it got extended later.

So the main intention was to unite the leads, that was the reason she could not move on with Abheenav in 6 years.

But then the great writer has other plans and ruined the story and the purpose of the leap!!!🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

Originally posted by: AuthorSneha

If we keep our favourites aside, and just go by the storyline, Akshara going back to Abhimanyu when Abhinav was alive wouldn't have made sense, because that would have made Akshara ungrateful. Also that was the natural progression of the story, Akshnav story looked like a perfect arranged marriage story, when 2 people when they marry feel nothing for each other but if your husband is caring, respectful and treats you well, then you fall in love and the bond becomes very strong.

So, for Abhi-Ra union, the only choice was for Akshara to go to abhimanyu ONLY AFTER Abhinav is no longer alive (because she had fallen for abhinav, so some external force like Abhir wanting Abhi-Ra marraige was needed )

The issue was the time leap, they cannot show in 2 months her moving on with another man but not loving him & refuses to love him even after marriage and only needs him as a father to her children. How is it fair to Abhimanyu ?

For 6 years they showed akshara still on her past ,her feelings for abhimanyu ,for story also it was done Akshara all did for her on abhimanyu her love was deep ,but hurt ,there was no feeling for nav show n,only her gratitude ,they could show she didnt want to go to abhimanyu because for what abhinav did for her and abhir,but their sudden love for nav by only degrading her past ,

Originally posted by: JustaFan13

The very purpose of introducing a cameo in the show was to unite the leads. And as per RS cameos role in the show was only for couple of months and it got extended later.

So the main intention was to unite the leads, that was the reason she could not move on with Abheenav in 6 years.

But then the great writer has other plans and ruined the story and the purpose of the leap!!!🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

Then blame the audience.

There have been acha aadmis in other shows also, like Onir in pavitra Rishta, Ravish in Jana na Dil se dur , Satya in ghum, and they were wonderful people and the female lead should have picked them but the leads were united because maximum audience wanted the leads together even if the relationship was unhealthy/toxic.

In yeh rishta also, we have had 3rd angles in previous generation like Vedika. But leads have always been United because majority of audience wanted that.

But in 3rd generation , The audience was equally divided. Infact some polls Abhi-Ra were winning and in some Akshnav. A lot of people wanted Akshnav together.

If majority of audience loved Abhinav, it is not the producer 's fault.