I beg to differ. I won’t say anything about Abhir as he’s just a little kid. And yes ur right Mrs Sharma is in anger. But isn’t what she doing EXACTLY the behaviour she hates Abhimanyu for?
Her anger is justified and Abhimanyu was expected to remain calm after 3 deaths? Mrs High horse on so called behaviour and manners blamed Abhimanyu of accusing her when he accused only of actions leading to deaths. And she is DIRECTLY accusing him of murder. Big difference. Anger is an emotion which doesn’t see gender. If Abhimanyu was expected to be calm and rational - now when tables have turned suddenly Mrs Sharmas anger is fine? At least I don’t buy this crap. If that’s the case she had NO right to be holier than thou and bash Abhimanyu for his anger when she herself has held Abhimanyu’s and Mr Sharmas collar 10 times in anger. Rules are same irrespective of gender.
Exactly anger is anger and abuse is abuse irrespective of gender. And people seem to forget this and feel they are feminists. Feminism calls for equality and not females are superior. If Abhi's anger is wrong so is Ak's and she has no right to give him bhashans like I don't want my child to be like you.
Exactly your child can never be like him because you have poisoned his mind and brought him up according to your experiences and he will like his uijaaa father you chose for him.
She had the right to choose a husband for herself but not a father for Abhir and she is wrong!
No one hates or dislikes her because she married Nav it's because of fatherji kaand!
157