In Akshara's case she mislead everyone including her loved ones ie immediate family members.
Divorce was signed when Ak was pregnant but date of submission isn't known.
Courts do not grant divorce when your partner or wife is pregnant.
Again loose ends left by the writers.
Abhir was born in Pathankot, in India parents fill in details of the newborn for hospitals records which in turn goes to the respective municipal corporation.
In Pathankot Akshara's gynac was Dr. Sandeep, He must have known the nitty gritty of his patient's caE
The same doc recalled Ak and Abhinav as Mr. and Mrs. Sharma during the Ganguar celebrations.
How did Sharma come into pic when Ab did not have a surname.
Plenty of Contradictions
So if we take only name change then Akshara has done lot of goof ups to make her case weak.
She should have sent a legal notice to Dr Abhimanyu Birla right away after Abhir was born while subsequently filing for sole custody.
Trp audiences can be fooled only to a certain extent.
As far as custody is concerned Abhimanyu's lawyers can always argue that mother wanted to erase birth father's existence. In spite of being very wealth led a hand to mouth living.
A typical joint custody case can go either ways when it comes for appeal in high court.
Edited by Salutethearmy - 2 years ago
1.1k