Abhinav Sharma [DT Note: pg-6] - Page 2

Originally posted by: DevilsHeart

It wasn’t easy for Abhimanyu to be friendly with him post the proposal just like it wasn’t easy for Abhinav.

@bold - just because law gives women rights doesn’t mean that not disclosing is ethical or moral in all situations. If law were absolute and always right, courts and judiciary won’t be needed to hear cases!

And Abhinav shouldn’t have tried to be friends with Abhimanyu when he didn’t intend to tell him the truth or if he felt insecure of ehis place with Akshara and Abhir because of him!

PS - Please stop taking things out of context to create sarcastic remarks for bashing Abhimanyu who ain’t even the topic of this thread. Its making the conversation unhealthy and difficult.

Tell me, morally, why is a woman obliged to disclose the paternity of a child to a man who a) kicked her out after a miscarriage without so much as the basic decency or medical duty to offer an abortion afterwards b) unequivocally had declared that he wanted nothing to do with her or her baby when repeated efforts were made to inform him of the same.

A mother should morally just spend six years of her life to inform a man of the paternity of the said child he had rejected after abusing her post-miscarriage. Lol.

Also, no one in this world has the moral obligation to override their spouse's consent to satisfy their dosti to their spouse's ex lol.

It doesn't make him a bad man.

And not Abhimanyu being defended for calling Abhinav a bad person after Akshara had called him out for not picking up her calls and had informed him about how Abhinav had saved the said child's life. Lol

PS. It wasn't easy for Abhimanyu to be friendly with Abhinav post-the-proposal, then maybe he should have referred Abhir to some other doctor to avoid the conflict of interest.

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Tell me, morally, why is a woman obliged to disclose the paternity of a child to a man who a) kicked her out after a miscarriage without so much as the basic decency or medical duty to offer an abortion afterwards b) unequivocally had declared that he wanted nothing to do with her or her baby when repeated efforts were made to inform him of the same.

A mother should morally just spend six years of her life to inform a man of the paternity of the said child he had rejected after abusing her post-miscarriage. Lol.

Also, no one in this world has the moral obligation to override their spouse's consent to satisfy their dosti to their spouse's ex lol.

It doesn't make him a bad man.

And not Abhimanyu being defended for calling Abhinav a bad person after Akshara had called him out for not picking up her calls and had informed him about how Abhinav had saved the said child's life. Lol

PS. It wasn't easy for Abhimanyu to be friendly with Abhinav post-the-proposal, then maybe he should have referred Abhir to some other doctor to avoid the conflict of interest.

I have already answered what I think regarding Abhinav being friendly with Abhimanyu. I said he seems to have good intentions but his actions are not always good. I didn’t say he is a bad person.

Not going to answer about Akshara or Abhimanyu as it would be deviating from the topic and I do not have the time today to get into an endless discussion about them.

I won't deny that's a correct character analysis of abhinav..all these qualities make him human..he is flawed but in a different way..he is emotional and weak , sometimes Indecisive sometimes clueless , sometimes unable to face tough situations ..

at the same time he is a good husband and exceptional father ..

Anyways.. the issue that he is cordial with abhimanyu is fine...he need not hate everyone who akshara hates and he need not love everyone who akshara loves...he is his own person with his own judgement ...he never saw abhimanyu as a threat to his marriage but always kept an option open for akshara , gave her time and space to decide , decisively, if she wants to go back to abhim...if abhim doesn't make him uncomfortable obviously it means he has full faith in akshara ...

I do agree that telling about Abhir's truth to Abhimanyu and Abhir was Akshara's decision and right. I have stated before that I hated they were showing Abhinav telling Abhir the truth and not Akshara after the wedding. But yes, I do also agree with your character analysis. It seems the writer keeps forgetting their own lines or have not created a sketch only and are winging it because there are massive inconsistencies in how Abhinav and Akshara have been behaving.

I was reading a post on this forum that said that dkp says audience loves to see their favorite character cry and hence, FLs often cry a lot. But here they have overdone it so much, and that too without a character sketch in mind, that it looked super inconsistent and hence, manipulative. Had they not shown these double standards and hypocrisy, which seems to be just bad writing for the new lead couple (I can't see Abhira anymore. Akshara loves her husband so she should be with him and Abhimanyu also deserves someone who loves him like he is capable of loving, not somebody in love with someone else), nobody would have found the crying so cringe and disconnected with even the legacy child here.

Originally posted by: cutepigs

I do agree that telling about Abhir's truth to Abhimanyu and Abhir was Akshara's decision and right. I have stated before that I hated they were showing Abhinav telling Abhir the truth and not Akshara after the wedding. But yes, I do also agree with your character analysis. It seems the writer keeps forgetting their own lines or have not created a sketch only and are winging it because there are massive inconsistencies in how Abhinav and Akshara have been behaving.

I was reading a post on this forum that said that dkp says audience loves to see their favorite character cry and hence, FLs often cry a lot. But here they have overdone it so much, and that too without a character sketch in mind, that it looked super inconsistent and hence, manipulative. Had they not shown these double standards and hypocrisy, which seems to be just bad writing for the new lead couple (I can't see Abhira anymore. Akshara loves her husband so she should be with him and Abhimanyu also deserves someone who loves him like he is capable of loving, not somebody in love with someone else), nobody would have found the crying so cringe and disconnected with even the legacy child here.

Originally posted by: Deltablues

His misplaced anger upon a random dude who kicked out his miscarrying wife calling him a bad human being lol

Yes he should be angry on that fact instead of AB calling him that he is not achaa aadmi.

Do you even the show ROFL 😂😂

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Tell me, morally, why is a woman obliged to disclose the paternity of a child to a man who a) kicked her out after a miscarriage without so much as the basic decency or medical duty to offer an abortion afterwards b) unequivocally had declared that he wanted nothing to do with her or her baby when repeated efforts were made to inform him of the same.

A mother should morally just spend six years of her life to inform a man of the paternity of the said child he had rejected after abusing her post-miscarriage. Lol.

Also, no one in this world has the moral obligation to override their spouse's consent to satisfy their dosti to their spouse's ex lol.

It doesn't make him a bad man.

And not Abhimanyu being defended for calling Abhinav a bad person after Akshara had called him out for not picking up her calls and had informed him about how Abhinav had saved the said child's life. Lol

PS. It wasn't easy for Abhimanyu to be friendly with Abhinav post-the-proposal, then maybe he should have referred Abhir to some other doctor to avoid the conflict of interest.

I seriously think you need to watch the show 😂

Even you ask anyone who likes Abhinav a lot they will say his anger was misplaced. Upon knowing that Abhimanyu is the one who is AK's ex he went like ' but bhaiji bure aadmi nahi hai haalat bure the' he even continued his bhai ji jaap.

During Abhir ka bday celebration it was when AbhiM said ap ache aadmi nahi hai Sharma ji he got pissed.

Quite weird and obviously misplaced anger. Rest would request you to please refrain from bringing other issues in the topic as it's clearly dedicated to Abhinav

You are more than welcome to share what you like about the guy instead of why you hate someone else.

Originally posted by: Pr1yanka

writer jo na gen 3 ke start and last 1 year ki story pata hai or naa hi khud key likhey hue scenes yaad rehte hain …iss writer ko jitna call out kiya jaaye utna kam hai …lol n this isn’t even only related to Abhinav…kyunki Abhinav ka character woh khud lekar aata hsi par abhimsnyu akshara pehle sey they …there was a legit story going on which he just up and trashed …so yes iskey writing ki deep analysis toh banti hai 😅

Hahahaha exactly. He has no thought and process in mind and hence keeps making these people say something and then do opposite and vice versa. I don't think he even remembered in the same day where Abhinav and Akshara discussed opening a business and then told Abhimanyu they came for few days. And this incompetence has led to people hating his creation and Akshara also. I feel like either somebody else writes Abhimanyu or HC is senior enough in industry to demand changes last minute because from the angry lion roar man led by his impulses, he seems to have evolved into a calmer person who's center is his son. In fact, he seems to be the only one currently not trying to manipulate any of the kids to do as he says, but rather dealing with maturity by treating them as smart people and explaining.

It would have been better if Neil ky instead Abhinav Harsh Birla 's illegitimate son hota

Originally posted by: Priyrabha

So he is emotional manipulator. Right?

If he is then he too isn't aware of this. This nature comes to him naturally. That's what I feel