Vishnu says that even though he married Meethi, he will never be able to love her and accept her as his wife and he is staying with her merely to live upto whatever promises he made to Ichcha in the past.
Meethi says she will never be able to forget Akash. She is not going back to Akash only because she is worried about Damini's reaction and health and it is not because she wants to live with Vishnu and give a try to their marriage. Infact she was/is ready to divorce Vishnu any second.
Meethi is always trying to re-unite Vishnu and Mukta. She is hellbent on the decision of getting back Mukta the man she loved.
Vishnu is doing utter nonsense in the sake of protecting Meethi from Akash. He clearly knows that Meethi and Akash are still in love with each other.
Taking all these points into consideration, how can people so clearly say that they can work on their marriage, its just been 15 days, they are in the same bedroom and same bed and hence they will fall in love with each other. So if anyone is in the same bedroom, they are bound to fall in love or what? If someone wears colourful pants, does that make him a psycho? Didn't expect this from you Rishi.
Yes, it is Vishnu's decision, but isin't the decision harmful? Its ruining an entire family. Is it worth the so called morals he follows? And I am not telling following morals is WRONG but I am stressing on the point that what Vishnu is doing in the name of morals is wrong. Why does he have to say Meethi that he will reconsider his decision if Meethi confesses? So if everyone are ok with Meethi getting back to Akash, will Vishnu go back to Mukta? What will happen to his morals then?
And one more general point I would like to put forward to EVERYONE
IF someone disagrees with any post that does not make their post illogical, senseless.
If someone agrees to a post that does not make their post logical.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and bashing everyone based on the posts they make is completely sick. No one here has to right to insult anyone's thoughts personally, they just have the right to question and argue with them. Because of few posts, many people who want to express their thoughts are being shunned because everytime they make a post, if its unfavourable they are always being insulted. 'Stockholm syndrome' criminal's minds and stuff. People should know to be sportive and there is always a limit to arguing. One cannot insult the other personally just because their favourite is not being supported. I hope everyone takes everyone's views in an unbiased way which would definitely prompt more healthy discussions.