Posted:
Originally posted by: fast trak
I dont think Tappu wudve been any better after knowing the truth. She doesnt care for anything other than herself. She didnt even bother to pick up her mothers call when she was in that 5 star hotel aur ab jail ki hawa lag gayi toh maa aur nani yaad aa gayi. Really matlabi character.@trupat.Jogi never neglected his own daughter. Its just that he tried to give Icha a good basic education. Whatevre it is Tappu was his own daughter and he cared for her a lot. Even Ammo loved Tappu. Why dont u comment abt that? Did ammo not treat Tappu like her own? Infact ammo was the one who told Icha that hamesha babyji ko khush rakhna hai which Icha has always done. Why r u trying to look for negativities in Jogi alone?The relation between Icha and Jogi was only built over time. If u remember even in childhood Tapasya took a vow from Icha ke tum mere maa papa ke paas kabhi nahi aaogi. I still recollect how scared Icha used to be when Jogi used to come lovingly to her. She used to scarily look at Tapasya and run away with an excuse. There r so many such incidents which make me feel that Tapasya always wudve been evil no matter what.
For-- "I don't think Tappu would have been better.if and.."..there is no excuse to let the bitterness grow in a child's mind and yet do nothing about it. Jogi took responsibilty to correct what he did wrong to Ichha ..was fine......but doing it abruptly-..and yet taking away something from Tapasya which she felt (and sure was made to feel right from her birth).......that as a parent his affection exclusively "belonged" to her. ..and not explaining her anything was not done. (what was his reason-that "she will grow upto become evil anyways...so let her suffer now..why even bother explain" - is that what you are trying to say was his reason?
Maybe you can't relate to a child psychology..think of a wife-who suddenly finds her husband starts giving same gifts to his maid servant(maybe it is out of a moral obligation like some guilt...)....the husband is giving same attention to his wife.....she knows its platonic and he's not sleeping with the maid...yet she will feel cheated-she will hate him for that...The way spouses feel that they have an "exclusive" right on their spouse...same way kids feel they have a "special" "exclusive" right on their parents-which they don't want to share with an outsider.(the reason they share love with their siblings is coz they understand the "reasoning".....but sudden sharing with an outsider unreasonably..might be completely unacceptable to the kid.
Kids are possessive about their parents...and if parents after letting them live with that possessiveness...suddenly become "equally" loving to someone...it has to accompany with reasoning and communication with their own child..the child deserves to know the reason..ti relate with it.
Ammu started caring for Tapasya as a part of her duty, and as a part of gratitude towards Jogi ...which Ichha understood..she saw everything......but the way Jogi showered fatherly love and gave everything "equal" to his daughter cannot be equated and rationalised in the same way. Financing Ichha's study...and giving her everything "equal" to his own daughter-are 2 different things. Jogi had a reason to give affection "equal" to his daughter, and definitely it cannot be denied that it was because of his guilt (they showed it in the serial...you can argue anything..but thats what they showed...the main reason of giving equal affection to Ichha was his guilt and repentance....it was not a gradual thing as you are saying...it was very abrupt and sudden when the realisation of killing Ichha's dad dawned on Jogi...)...... if he had shared this reason of sudden behavior change with Tapasya.....it might have reduced the bitterness..if not eliminated completely.
Tapasya was not shown evil right from the beginning...but initially she was shown as a loving, kind hearted girl.....she turned evil after Jogi started giving "equal" love to Ichha. Thats what has been shown in the serial ...you agree with it or not-or say whatever you wanna say.
And your argument...that Tapasya hid so many things, so its fine for Jogi to not have shared it with her.........😆..A father is more responsible towards his minor child...parents and children both have things they hide from each other. But there is a moral responsibilty of a parent to share a fact ..and communicate about something thats affecting their child's psychology so much..and causing so much pain to her.
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Indian Mythology
Chakravarti Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan
