Originally posted by: Yuvika_15
going by that logic, imli was his partner in crime, yet villagers never said a word to her-- why because she is one of them? talk about the so called double standards of the village people. they were ready to pounce on chagan and abuse him for doing as ragini said even though he like them fell for her game.. but they have never said a word against imli who has done as many bad things as suraj has done.suraj was following his father's footsteps - jaisa baap waisa beta type... but imli, what is her excuse for being the partner in crime and doing bad to the villagers? she was born and raised in the village and very well knew the difficulties and torture her family faced by the likes of KNR and Manohar yet that didn't stop her from abusing the villagers along with suraj... so if suraj hasn't done anything to deserve redemption and forgiveness, neither has imli, but if they are willing to forgive imli who hasn't once apologised, then surely they can forgive suraj who since becoming a bandua has apologised for his actions and has tried to redeem himself and help the villagers...