Is Uma's arrest justified?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: sneha_17

Exactly, 100 % agreed

if the children didn't consent to the wedding then the children can ask the police to press charges. If the children don't complain but, are underage then also charges are possible. Just because he did it for dharam, Kanak returned, etc. Doesn't make the initial forced marriage legal ...consent was required for marriage n not obtained.

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: sneha_17

Sorry, as you referred Rape and victim getting married , it's rape not punishable by law..

We are not saying Uma is right but arrest is not legal..

How is arrest not legal? Kanak n her family can ask for charges. Is there a statute of limitation for Uma's crime that has expired within two months if not then charges can be laid. Now his lawyer can try to trivialize by saying marriage was consented to afterwards...that maybe a defense, but it doesn't mean charges can't be laid if there is a legitimate complaint

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

hanishank

@hanishank

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: sneha_17

Exactly 100% agreed

if they show arrest of uma then 99% telly hero characters should spend most of their life in jail 😆
in other shows it was blackmail ing And forced ..and here only the forced

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

Agree TV heroes are zeroes who should be serving time in jail if they are shown blackmailing n forcing women. It irresponsible to romanticize n glorify such behavior. Glad these makers are attempting to at least tackle the issue. Sad that us crime is being justified by parallels that are just as inappropriate.

Quote

sneha

@sneha_17

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
How is arrest not legal? Kanak n her family can ask for charges. Is there a statute of limitation for Uma's crime that has expired within two months if not then charges can be laid. Now his lawyer can try to trivialize by saying marriage was consented to afterwards...that maybe a defense, but it doesn't mean charges can't be laid if there is a legitimate complaint

sorry, I hope you did your research, the legitimate complaint would be only the fact Uma married her forcefully...

What about enquiry and other facts of Kanak announcing that she is married in front of Hanuman Gali and returning to Uma's place willingly, even she stay to prove that they won't work out as per law it can't be 20 - 30 days. She should live with for 6 months.

Even when a divorced filed under Mutual consent, court give 6 months time period to approve even though you are married for more than 5 years.

It's Indian law

Kanak can still null/void this marriage as there was no consummation.

Arrest won't stick and if you have a strong attorney/lawyer Uma can file defamation case against Rathi

Vansh has no ground as he let kanak stay with Uma after knowing the truth..

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: sneha_17

sorry, I hope you did your research, the legitimate complaint would be only the fact Uma married her forcefully...

What about enquiry and other facts of Kanak announcing that she is married in front of Hanuman Gali and returning to Uma's place willingly, even she stay to prove that they won't work out as per law it can't be 20 - 30 days. She should live with for 6 months.

Even when a divorced filed under Mutual consent, court give 6 months time period to approve even though you are married for more than 5 years.

It's Indian law

Kanak can still null/void this marriage as there was no consummation.

Arrest won't stick and if you have a strong attorney/lawyer Uma can file defamation case against Rathi

Vansh has no ground as he let kanak stay with Uma after knowing the truth..

That is the thing about the law...let the makers show it. Crimes 've defenses. Let US defend his forced marriage. Let the law take it's course. Also lets not mix family law n criminal law. They walk side by side, but serve different purposes. Voiding marriage is not the remedy for the crime of forced marriage. The legality of marriage going forward is one issue that needs to be sorted by courts. The lack of consent to the marriage is another. Kanak's family has every right to complain about the lack of conesnt.

Does Kanak's pretending the marriage was normal to her family undo her actual lack of consent? Lawyers can twist that in US ki favour, but the fact is there was no consent at the time of marriage. The whole of ladnu saw this.

Also it would be educating of viewers if shown properly. Glad if the legal aspects are not ignored, but addressed head on.

Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 8 years ago

Quote

sneha

@sneha_17

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
That is the thing about the law...let the makers show it. Crimes 've defenses. Let US defend his forced marriage. Let the law take it's course. Also lets not mix family law n criminal law. They walk side by side, but serve different purposes. Voiding marriage is not the remedy for the crime of forced marriage. The legality of marriage going forward is one issue that needs to be sorted by courts. The lack of consent to the marriage is another. Kanak's family has every right to complain about the lack of conesnt.
Does Kanak's pretending the marriage was normal to her family undo her actual lack of consent? Lawyers can twist that in US ki favour, but the fact is there was no consent at the time of marriage. The whole of ladnu saw this.

Also it would be educating of viewers if shown properly. Glad if the legal aspects are not ignored, but addressed head on.

Hope you belief comes true...

you are so angry which is justified..

May be you are not married or you have a wonderful married life...

Laws are different when marriage gets involved

Quote

Omkideewani

@Omkideewani

Beginner

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: sneha_17

Hope you belief comes true...

you are so angry which is justified..

May be you are not married or you have a wonderful married life...

Laws are different when marriage gets involved

I think there is some mistake here regarding the interpretation of law. US can be booked under forceful marriage and kidnap for his marriage with Kanak without her consent. Later his lawyer can argue that kanak accepted the marriage but even then he'll be acquitted only on the basis of her statement in person.

The charges will still apply as long as she doesn't take the case back on him. If it goes to the court then it'll be almost impossible to save him from penalty though.

Quote

Deepthy

@deeps07

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: sneha_17

sorry, I hope you did your research, the legitimate complaint would be only the fact Uma married her forcefully...

What about enquiry and other facts of Kanak announcing that she is married in front of Hanuman Gali and returning to Uma's place willingly, even she stay to prove that they won't work out as per law it can't be 20 - 30 days. She should live with for 6 months.

Even when a divorced filed under Mutual consent, court give 6 months time period to approve even though you are married for more than 5 years.

It's Indian law

Kanak can still null/void this marriage as there was no consummation.

Arrest won't stick and if you have a strong attorney/lawyer Uma can file defamation case against Rathi

Vansh has no ground as he let kanak stay with Uma after knowing the truth..

sorry i am not exactly sure about the episodes of that time..have missed many episodes during these.times..but i have a doubt..didnt bhabhoo and family throw her out because she got married when she went back to.puskhar..so umas house was the only house she had knw?...the lawyer.could say that pressyre from.society and no support from.her own family at that time.made ger go back...may be she could have filed a complaint then..but she is not the one who filed the complain now either..its her family who did it when the knew the full.truth... they do have the right to..i think if kanak withdraw the case and accepts the marrisge in court then uma is free..else it can ve said that she had to.come back due to family pressure..or.due to defamity after marriage..

Edited by deeps07 - 8 years ago

Quote

DivineDarkness

@DivineDarkness

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: sneha_17

sorry, I hope you did your research, the legitimate complaint would be only the fact Uma married her forcefully...

What about enquiry and other facts of Kanak announcing that she is married in front of Hanuman Gali and returning to Uma's place willingly, even she stay to prove that they won't work out as per law it can't be 20 - 30 days. She should live with for 6 months.

Even when a divorced filed under Mutual consent, court give 6 months time period to approve even though you are married for more than 5 years.

It's Indian law

Kanak can still null/void this marriage as there was no consummation.

Arrest won't stick and if you have a strong attorney/lawyer Uma can file defamation case against Rathi

Vansh has no ground as he let kanak stay with Uma after knowing the truth..

1St the marriage is voidable since it's done by force, yes we can argue Kanak still stayed with Uma but what if she say she was under duress?!

She saw how Ved who came to enquire about Payal was manhandled and her own personal experience so she was scared for herself and her families life had to go back.. It's perfect ground for annulment of marriage.

This is a forced marriage AkSh dn't need to stay together for 6 months like normal couples do.. Consent of one party was never there.. Uma's argument of getting Baghvaan ka sanket itself is lamest argument one can ever put forward. Whereas Kanak can pointout how he married her how he is consider in Laadno how Payal was mmarried, and then there is recording of Shop paper transfer, it's only Uma saying it's not him not proven till now, so enough ground for court to annul the marriage and punish Uma for forced marriage, getting Payal married to picture if someone complain against that..

For argument sake if we agree Vansh dn't have but Ved and others have!

Edited by DivineDarkness - 8 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4

Is Uma's arrest justified? - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics