I really don't understand what makers want to show? Love changes people I understand... but they change minor aspects of one's personality... more like they bring out a softer brighter side which is existent already in that person. Love can't change a person's identity or existence itself.
Was this story going to be a rehab project for badly brought up men? Or a love story between two fundamentally different individuals? If falling in love with Pallavi results in Raghav turning over his own basic fundamentals... become a saint from that grey hue he dons then I am sorry to say but he was better off without her.
I stared watching this because of the stark difference between the couple. I was intrigued by how they fall in love and strive to continue loving each other despite their huge ideological differences and ways of living. If the makers try to show how one person ends up completely changing his canvas for his lover then.... Im outta here.
I want to see Raghav with his personality and his myriad flaws intact and Pallavi with her own virtues and vices and both of them being in love inspite of that and it is viable to merge their nuances in the middle. Cause after all, some of their principles are exactly the same.
Their capacity of infinte love.
Their wherewithall to do literally anything for the people they love.
The boundaries of humanity which would restrict them to overcome that line (more for Raghav this is.. I didn't see him advocating manslaughter ever).
Their immense pain tolerance level and will to survive despite the situation they are thrown into.
Their magnanimous nature for everyone and love for children.
There you go, enough points to feel attracted towards each other. We say people fall in love because of the desire to taste a facet they themselves don't possess. But I think people fall in love as they share the love for the similar flavours of life and emotions as well.
Let's agree to disagree!
comment:
p_commentcount