Struggling to accept Swaragini - Page 3

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

I think it's strange for every one, because all this so called swaragini bond is nothing but completely balderdash.

Ragini was not only negative as a character, she was also insensitive and evil. Sanskar's character was negative and cruel but still had his conscious and feelings in place. Therefore his redemptation was wonderful.

Ragini's love for swara has conditions. She loves her as long as lucky belongs to him and loves her. The day lucky starts loving swara she would be ready to kill her.

Ragini's love for lucky has no conditions and is actually true love. She never blamed lucky for loving swara, she only blamed swara. When she was kidnapped by lakshay during malkin track she never tried to hurt him in any way that is physically, emotionally yes she assaulted him. Ragini wanted Lakshay and she got him. So now she loves swara and is ready to do anything for her. I think the problem with cvs is that they want the audience to forget negative ragini completely as if it never happened. But forgetting is not a solution, solution is regret, redemption, guilt and remorse.

Originally posted by: The.Lannister

Not only Sanskaar, Swara & Laksh had to pay for all their real & imagined crimes but even the other villains like Kavita, Maasi, Kavya who came in later paid heavily & surprisingly legally😆 as well. Ragini's obsessions & crimes were all explained away by Swara, AP & the CVs as pehla pyaar, saccha pyaar, etc. So tell me how is Kavita wrong if she goes to such lengths to get her pehla pyaar? Just because she isn't Ragini doesnt make her wrong. Maasi wanted to break ShekShomi marriage, she paid with her life ultimately. Ragini DID break ShekShomi marriage, and what did she get? Shomi caressing her head as she loving croons Ragu Ragu?🤢 Kavya became maalkin & tortured the family. And then the biggest joke was Ragini saving them when just a few days ago she had made them her servants?😲 I think the character who is the worst victim is Laksh. I feel terrible for him. It is for this same reason I cannot even like RagYa. They had chemistry, But I do not see them as a pair. I see Laksh as a victim of Ragini.🤢

I had read that RS would sooner replace an actor than spoil a character. I wish she had done this with Teju & Ragini. Teju was good as a negative Ragini but not exactly irreplacable. Rather than spoil such a brilliant character & then keep introducing new negative characters every two weeks to justify Ragini's deeds they could have kept Ragini negative. Honestly not a single villain after Ragini can match her brilliance as a villain.

Originally posted by: SizzleDazzle

You spoke my mind...I've always wondered if Ragini's deeds can be justified in the name of love, why not Kavita's?...o yes,Kavita DID kill and Raginis' were only attempts(thanks to the fisherwomen and the fake knife🥱)

Originally posted by: The.Lannister

@bold: I agree completely!

Not only Sanskaar, Swara & Laksh had to pay for all their real & imagined crimes but even the other villains like Kavita, Maasi, Kavya who came in later paid heavily & surprisingly legally😆 as well. Ragini's obsessions & crimes were all explained away by Swara, AP & the CVs as pehla pyaar, saccha pyaar, etc. So tell me how is Kavita wrong if she goes to such lengths to get her pehla pyaar? Just because she isn't Ragini doesnt make her wrong. Maasi wanted to break ShekShomi marriage, she paid with her life ultimately. Ragini DID break ShekShomi marriage, and what did she get? Shomi caressing her head as she loving croons Ragu Ragu?🤢 Kavya became maalkin & tortured the family. And then the biggest joke was Ragini saving them when just a few days ago she had made them her servants?😲 I think the character who is the worst victim is Laksh. I feel terrible for him. It is for this same reason I cannot even like RagYa. They had chemistry, But I do not see them as a pair. I see Laksh as a victim of Ragini.🤢

I had read that RS would sooner replace an actor than spoil a character. I wish she had done this with Teju & Ragini. Teju was good as a negative Ragini but not exactly irreplacable. Rather than spoil such a brilliant character & then keep introducing new negative characters every two weeks to justify Ragini's deeds they could have kept Ragini negative. Honestly not a single villain after Ragini can match her brilliance as a villain.

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

I think it's strange for every one, because all this so called swaragini bond is nothing but completely balderdash.

Ragini was not only negative as a character, she was also insensitive and evil. Sanskar's character was negative and cruel but still had his conscious and feelings in place. Therefore his redemptation was wonderful.

Ragini's love for swara has conditions. She loves her as long as lucky belongs to him and loves her. The day lucky starts loving swara she would be ready to kill her.

Ragini's love for lucky has no conditions and is actually true love. She never blamed lucky for loving swara, she only blamed swara. When she was kidnapped by lakshay during malkin track she never tried to hurt him in any way that is physically, emotionally yes she assaulted him. Ragini wanted Lakshay and she got him. So now she loves swara and is ready to do anything for her. I think the problem with cvs is that they want the audience to forget negative ragini completely as if it never happened. But forgetting is not a solution, solution is regret, redemption, guilt and remorse.

Originally posted by: The.Lannister

@bold: That is how they favour Ragini. They destroyed other characters to build up a positive Ragini & failed both ways. Like in Kavi track W*F was Sanskaar doing?🤢 After such a brilliant & mature exit W*F did Kavi do returning back having turned into Ragini 2.0? 🤢 In Kavya track W*F was Laksh doing?🤢 Unfortunately it isn't working. Maybe they should stop working so desperately & then it might😆