Are they Ram Sita ? I am a Christian so ? tell - Page 4

Originally posted by: Nydv

Armaan as ravan

So cvs finally realised TrashMaan should be Ravan
Great choice he has criminal qualities to be ravan👍

Originally posted by: Firefly_shines

I honestly hate itv for using mythological symbolism in their show. Aur agar dikhana hai toh correctly dikhao. Navri Sita chodo, Mandodari bane layak nahi hai. Coz she was also a chaste woman. Navri is perfectly fit to be Shurpanaka. Just like Shurpanaka started lusting over a married man despite being recently widowed. Navri was busy luting over married Armaan after Anshu’s death.

@b : one hundred percent. Mazak banake rakhte the logon ki faith ka.

Yk, unlike Ravan who was half Rakshas, Surphanakha was a fully demonic entity.

So while you can say Shurpanakha was physically attracted to Ram ji but unki nature dekhe she wanted to marry him. He was one man woman, hence did not agree. Her fault was usne apni ego pe le liya ki how can you reject me ? -- it became a vengeful jealousy.

Originally posted by: Firefly_shines

True. As a kid, I had heard Ravan’s only flaw was his arrogance which caused his destruction or else he was a revered man well versed with vedas. But when I grew up, I read he committed some heinous crimes. The thing is like you said he was half Rakshas so for them committing rakshas or pishacha vivaah (abducting women, forcefully marrying them or r*ping them) isn’t wrong. Do we criticise a lion for killing a sheep? No cause that’s the law of jungle.

Comparing a human committing crimes to that of a rakshas and saying human is better makes no sense. Coz then we will have to consider all the good deeds Ravan has done. From penancing for 10000 years to please Brahma to cutting off his head please Shiva and creating Shiv Tandav Stotra. So you right, comparing Armaan with Ravan is an insult to Ravan coz despite marrying a thousand women, Ravan loved and respected his chief consort Mandodari the most, which Armaan sa can never do.

You articulated it way better than me.

Abhira as sita

Originally posted by: Nydv

Abhira as sita

There's no one like Sita Maa, but at least unki bare minimum qualities bhi nahi hai inme.

She didn't let people step all over her & she always took a stand for the right thing.

Originally posted by: Firefly_shines

True. As a kid, I had heard Ravan’s only flaw was his arrogance which caused his destruction or else he was a revered man well versed with vedas. But when I grew up, I read he committed some heinous crimes. The thing is like you said he was half Rakshas so for them committing rakshas or pishacha vivaah (abducting women, forcefully marrying them or r*ping them) isn’t wrong. Do we criticise a lion for killing a sheep? No cause that’s the law of jungle.

Comparing a human committing crimes to that of a rakshas and saying human is better makes no sense. Coz then we will have to consider all the good deeds Ravan has done. From penancing for 10000 years to please Brahma to cutting off his head please Shiva and creating Shiv Tandav Stotra. So you right, comparing Armaan with Ravan is an insult to Ravan coz despite marrying a thousand women, Ravan loved and respected his chief consort Mandodari the most, which Armaan sa can never do.

Raavan was ahankari. In this ego he forgot what is dharam and adharam, though he Being a great scholar and master of veena and biggest shiva bhakht couldn't guide him.

He became so egotistic that he though himself as God.

There is saying vinash kari Viprith buddhi

Originally posted by: Nydv

Armaan as ravan

As he should!