I have read the whole comments . True, Drugging is a very big crime.. & so is MISTRUST..
As an example, If a war is going on in b/w 2 countries, (A&B),
B corrupted 2" main deputed officials" in A to create circumstances for the win of B.
1 created physical damages within(by turning many in his sides/ killing/ drugging & abusing).
2 created long lasting damages by giving up the trust of country by leaking its important details.
Both are doing the same, but which lasts long shadows is most important. Punishments may be same, but the aftereffects of each deed is different.
1 can anytime rectify his mistakes by returning back.. or he may get punished for which will give less impact in future COMPARED TO 2nd wHich created long impacts in future.
Here, situations doesn't match i know but mistrust also has to pay... maybe we can't predict the extend.
swara had forgiven both. Then, why you are still comparing sanskar & Laksh?
Is it because she didn't gave a second chance to lakshya..
Let me tell you she neither had given the chance to sanskar.
itz one's ability to makeup for his mistaes.
From swara's pov- the one whome she had trusted blindly hd mistrusted her.
So, he has to go through much more repenting than sanskar did to make up to his mistakes.
A DEED CANNOT BE SIMPLY MEASURED BY ITS ACTIONS, BUT BY THE LONG LASTING IMPACTS OF THE ACTIONS.
Here, sanskar drugged swara, he corrected & repented for it.
But, if i say, a simple mistrust had more impact- it laid swara's dignity in question?
ACTIONS IN CRUCIAL TIME MEASURES MORE, & DO DECISIONS. I do have a feeling that mistrust of laksh has more impact in swara than sanskar's drugging.
1 more thing, sanskar is not the only person who drugged her- RAGINI TOO DID . She is also forgiven. Then, why are you not comparing LAKSH & RAGINI?
Is this post only intended for malignating sanskar?
Edited by sree2015 - 9 years ago