TOPIC CLOSED. Matter sorted

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

513248

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: gk_09
Dear itstimetospeak,

Since you have brought this up publicly, I shall reply here as well.

I understand your intent was to make a fun post, which is perfectly fine. We certainly encourage fun posts. However, when you mentioned viewers it comes across as provoking or mocking. No one is saying you can't comment on an actor's acting abilities but involving people and their views is when you cross the line. Mocking an audience was never acceptable and hence why your topic was closed. To you it maybe fun, but to others it has hurt their sentiments.

The topic you have linked above essentially turned into a battleground, or was on the verge too. To avoid the fight, the section DT closed the topic.

Should you have anymore questions, feel free to drop me a PM :)

Thanks,
GK

@blue: I beg your pardon, but the TM never targetted any specific viewer; only the views of the general public on the actress' acting were mentioned...oh wait, they were 'visualized'. Freedom of imagination, anyone?

Plus, if you failed to notice, she did get likes which means viewers DO have that opinion. And even if she wouldn't have gotten any likes, well, it's pathetic how a lil piece of criticism and opinion is indigestible for some DT Members. Get over your high notions of measly virtual powers.

@red: Why not warn the forum members who barge in fighting everytime for the slightest difference in opinion? Why must the whole topic suffer because of the few butthurt members? 🤢

Edited by -Aimz- - 12 years ago

Quote

itstimetospeak

@itstimetospeak

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

there is so much pessimistic narrow minded thinking tht ppl will take even fun wrongly. as if the actress is their personal property.

and i was only talking abt her acting nothing else. how narrow minded the DT is.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

659287

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: no_username
what is up with the negativity towards "criticism"???

i mean some countries have websites nd magazine just 2 criticize...nd they r appreciated...ppl love those criticism...

lol. Ask mods of this site as to what they do when they get to see criticism of any star. They either increase WL or ban member when criticism is too much! Somebody teach these mods accepting the criticism n appreciate it.

Edited by Lallan-Top - 12 years ago

Quote

rini_kat

@rini_kat

Dazzler

Posted: 12 years ago

#14

Really don't know what to say. That was really a very polite post...It was an innocent humorous fun post...

Quote

@gk_09

Alumni

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: -Aimz-

@blue: I beg your pardon, but the TM never targetted any specific viewer; only the views of the general public on the actress' acting were mentioned...oh wait, they were 'visualized'. Freedom of imagination, anyone?

Plus, if you failed to notice, she did get likes which means viewers DO have that opinion. And even if she wouldn't have gotten any likes, well, it's pathetic how a lil piece of criticism and opinion is indigestible for some DT Members. Get over your high notions of measly virtual powers.

@red: Why not warn the forum members who barge in fighting everytime for the slightest difference in opinion? Why must the whole topic suffer because of the few butthurt members? 🤢

Where does it say that those who "barge in fighting" will not get warned? They are equally liable and are at fault. Just because you don't see anything being done doesn't mean it hasn't or isn't currently being looked into. Stop assuming otherwise.

Little piece of criticism? For all we care, it could be a big piece of criticism. It's not us who make up the forum but rather members. We are not lurking around with our spy glasses ready to close down topics. The DT place rules and take action based on the forum's nature. We adapt to the situation.

itstimetospeak - Would you have been sportive if similar post was made about your favourite? I'll give you the benefit of doubt and say your post was okay but the comments went in a different direction, it was about the "fans/members" and not about your post.

Quote

itstimetospeak

@itstimetospeak

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: gk_09

Where does it say that those who "barge in fighting" will not get warned? They are equally liable and are at fault. Just because you don't see anything being done doesn't mean it hasn't or isn't currently being looked into. Stop assuming otherwise.

Little piece of criticism? For all we care, it could be a big piece of criticism. It's not us who make up the forum but rather members. We are not lurking around with our spy glasses ready to close down topics. The DT place rules and take action based on the forum's nature. We adapt to the situation.

itstimetospeak - Would you have been sportive if similar post was made about your favourite? I'll give you the benefit of doubt and say your post was okay but the comments went in a different direction, it was about the "fans/members" and not about your post.

@BOLD i understand your concerns about the fan wars going on in BV forum. really i dont want anyone to fight bcoz of my post. but members showed zero tolerance to my post. i have made several such posts in the past also but never did i attack fan groups/membrs nor did i post anything on the looks/personal lives of the actors. i know IF rules and i respect them.

what hurt me was the sudden closure of the topic. DT could have posted a warning if fight happens and given a chance to the post. if fights continued then topic could have been closed. but my topic was immediately closed. 😭 if my action demands public apology to ppl who have been hurted i will not feel ashamed in saying sorry to hurt members.

and coming to my favourites. my favs rashmi desai and tina dutta are bashed every other day in uttaran forum. have u seen me fighting with anyone? ask jnawaz she'll tell u. i never indulge in fan wars. my only motive to come to IF is to have fun make memebers smile and smile myself😭

i swear i didnt have any bad motives. 😭 i did the post with a pure heart. atleast DT could have given one chance and posted the warning. there was no need to close it directly.

anyways jo hua so hua. lets not waste our precious time on a post. lets all be like a happy family.

sorry for this trouble. we hope DT will give us a chance to post our views and topics will be closed only if the situation worsens.

Edited by itstimetospeak - 12 years ago

Quote

352771

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: gk_09

Where does it say that those who "barge in fighting" will not get warned? They are equally liable and are at fault. Just because you don't see anything being done doesn't mean it hasn't or isn't currently being looked into. Stop assuming otherwise.

Little piece of criticism? For all we care, it could be a big piece of criticism. It's not us who make up the forum but rather members. We are not lurking around with our spy glasses ready to close down topics. The DT place rules and take action based on the forum's nature. We adapt to the situation.
itstimetospeak - Would you have been sportive if similar post was made about your favourite? I'll give you the benefit of doubt and say your post was okay but the comments went in a different direction, it was about the "fans/members" and not about your post.

Lol. Equally liable at fault? Lord spare us from the fangirl logic. Okay let's take an example. If I call Rani Mukherjee a two faced homewrecker who according to the buzz slept with Govinda and started an affair with the married Aditiya Chopra, does this make omni equally liable and equally at fault as those faggots who go on to wish death upon omni and rape upon his sister? The example was taken to show fanbotic mentality. How can celeb gossiping (which some fangirls in the DT consider to be bashing) be considered equally wrong as member personal attacking? Heck if it makes us 'equally liable', why not we start returning the favour instead? 🥱 There's no point in assuming. If I go on to create some topic right now in one of the Saas-Bahu sections under your cyber jurisdiction and criticise the main lead, i'm drop dead sure to witness a crappy childish note as such within few seconds

'Bashing characters is NOT allowed! Personal life of actors should NOT be discussed. People should understand the SENTIMENTS of others before creating such topics. Action will be taken against those who have breached the rules.

Topic Closed

Regards

Saas Bahu Soap Opera DEV-il Team'

The basic interpretation being to worship an actor some cyber power obsessed folks lub or get the f**k out of the forum.

Edited by Omnipotence - 12 years ago