Quit bloody misusing the power fanimal Higherups! - Page 11

So, IF's COC can be basically summarized as :

Well if it would have been dictatorship then we wouldn't have indulged in a discussion.

If one reads my post its clear that its meant for "all" and emphasizing on not to spread negativity in the forum.

If one feels that the word "hatemongers" really describes them then its better they look inside on what they are doing instead of asking questions.

Regards

Originally posted by: Freethinker112

So, IF's COC can be basically summarized as :

1. Discuss.

2. Discuss but you know, say something good, even if someone is not doing good because who the hell cares for performance? But yes, we stand by constructive criticism.

3. Err, you know that's become too constructive a criticism. Please don't criticize.

4. That's actually bashing, how dare you not worship like the majority?

5. Enough, warn, ban, we don't tolerate negative things around here.

6. No, that's okay, those bashers deserve it, they are just being constructively criticized against. Come on, troll isn't name calling. It's not negative.

u nailed IT

Originally posted by: Omnipotence

Let's see what kind of excuse does Vijay has to offer for this crap. I'm done. Can we really trust the higher ups? They f**king have our IPs, they have our email ids. If the retards cannot keep a WL private, how can we really trust them?🤬

I should be a moderator

😳

Originally posted by: vijay

Well if it would have been dictatorship then we wouldn't have indulged in a discussion.

If one reads my post its clear that its meant for "all" and emphasizing on not to spread negativity in the forum.

If one feels that the word "hatemongers" really describes them then its better they look inside on what they are doing instead of asking questions.

Regards

Originally posted by: vijay

Well if it would have been dictatorship then we wouldn't have indulged in a discussion.

If one reads my post its clear that its meant for "all" and emphasizing on not to spread negativity in the forum.

If one feels that the word "hatemongers" really describes them then its better they look inside on what they are doing instead of asking questions.

Regards

Negativity is a Word very much Subjective , Pun intended !!

A person's honest opinion or POV might come across as spreading negativity to the others . But I dont think on a portal website a mere virtual member can force upon or influence other's ideology or thinking ways !!

Forum is to express our views we shall do it ! The line of bar for Contstructive criticism is where the problem is.

You are saying fanboots etc are namecalling and isnt fixing up a God's name or using it as an adjective to some celebrity , someone really bad is bad and EQUALLY HURTS RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS? I do feel offended on reading likes of Lord Grover or Grover is the Kishan Kanhaiya
🤢

What i can do reading this thread of vijay for some certain members is to laugh at him that too loudly so that he could hear me. HAHAHAHA

I'm sorry Vijay bhai but that's not right. One IPKKND member called me "bull" referred to me being a bull not saying I didn't say anything bad because I did it's unfair that member is still on IF.🥱 Zee_News got so much abuse and bullying but no action was taken!

Originally posted by: Freethinker112

So, IF's COC can be basically summarized as :

1. Discuss.

2. Discuss but you know, say something good, even if someone is not doing good because who the hell cares for performance? But yes, we stand by constructive criticism.

3. Err, you know that's become too constructive a criticism. Please don't criticize.

4. That's actually bashing, how dare you not worship like the majority?

5. Enough, warn, ban, we don't tolerate negative things around here.

6. No, that's okay, those bashers deserve it, they are just being constructively criticized against. Come on, troll isn't name calling. It's not negative.

Well I tend to disagree with you. Cause there are several threads I see on the forum if a particular actor's work is not upto the mark and members do post it on the forum.

But the problem comes when people goes overboard and stop being objective. Making posts posts like the actor looks like a "monkey" or "gober" thats what creates the problem and that is what we don't support.