SKR-Of loops and symbolisms#5: Hard way and Smart Way : P.88 - Page 78

In one of the episode when ram tells siya about raghukul when coming to mithila. In the FB scenes shown he asks something to guru vashisht don't remember the exact questions

Originally posted by: vipraja26

Yes Shruti, I am aware that Luv Kush will go and recite the story of Ramayana as taught by Valmiki and there by ask questions etc ,

The point that the kind of thinking the children would develop under this great Maharishi might have also been a factor in leading them ( along with the factor that they are sita's sons )to question the justice rendered to Sita , is what I referred to . Like the way Mithila sisters have been groomed by Janak have a special strength of mind to question etc .

In contrast , the generations of Raghukul never questioned about the acts of Raja Harishchandra's acts as they were only thinking from the vachan palan Reeti and a typical patriarchal society . Nobody including Ram had not questioned Guru Vasishta as the stress was on vachan palan at all costs !

I too recall a famous song of Ramayana sung by Luv and Kush in an old Tamil film .

I had just liked the way he was in support of sita and quite annoyed at the injustice rendered to her by Ayodhya vasis which reflected in his conversation with Janak .

Sorry to interfere but just wanted to say only this much. Hope you don't mind.

There was a contrast difference between the teaching given to Mithila princesses and the Ayodya princes. The boys were given the knowledge of Sanskar, Raj Dharma, manu Dharma (humanism) and Yudhdharma etc. which are essential for the boys to become good human and best warriors. But the girls got the knowledge of binding the family, behaving with elders and youngers and how to take care of guests, how to support the family etc. which were essential for girls.

Yes I do appreciate Janak for his grooming of his daughters but at the same time, I am 100% sure that he would have taught the same what raghukul had taught to his sons, if he had any. So let us not compare

@vipraja there was no problem in the teaching of Raghukul. Problem of Raghukul was in actions. It was not inline with the teaching. What was taught in mithila and Ayodhya would have been same. I agree to Jaya on that.

@Savitha let us not judge on the precap😆😆. precap of SKR has fooled me many times 😆😆. Episodes would be rushed as I feel the first plan would have been to end the show in Oct and then it got extended till Nov. So maybe after a week it will slow down a bit.

Read this

@savitha what I meant is woman might take law into their hands in desperation. What happens after that well that is a different thing. Today there will be enough people supporting the girls also. So it is not as bad as it used to be. Because when law doesnt give closure people will themselves go for closure.

I loved the way CVs have portrayed luv and kush characters. Posting analysis soon.

@savitha di few versions say luv kush go to ayodha and ask the king for the queen and then realize that siya was exiled if that's the case they had captured the ashwamedh as kids not realizing what they were doing and in dp book it's not mentioned like they defeated, shatrugn sees them and tells valmiki to bring them to ayodha like street entertains. Valmiki Is not really happy at such an invite to which siya says hierarchy stems from the need to dominate not the human ability to expand the mind. And then in ayodha after realizing the queen has been exiled they capture the horse and then defeat everyone and when ram comes siya stops him saying these are his children so that's when bhoomipravesh happens going by Devdutt book.
Btw hadn't ram destroyed the wrong doers in asur clan? Luv and kush also kill asurs?

Luv is like ram keeping maryada
While kush is like siya
And had read in DP book siya teaching
Plants compete for sunlight and animals for mates. Blessed with humanity only we have the power to abondon competition to so so is dharma. The scene of them falling in siya feet seemed to depict that