SKR-Of loops and symbolisms#3:7/06: Pg:138: MAGIC - Page 63

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

52.1k

Users

25

Likes

3.6k

Frequent Posters

radianteyes. thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: LakshMila



Me too yaar!
But that wuld be possible only when I grow up a little more 😆


Me too
But I will once at least
All alone

So , we share a lot
Let's find out what's more 😆
daydreamers thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
Charvi I read ur post...
Many things came in my mind.. I'll post when the thoughts are coherent.. 😊
daydreamers thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: EternalStars.


Are the TRPs that bad??😭


No idea as such but on an average definitely below 2.

For trps there's a need for craze.. And mythology definitely isn't about craze at all times.

And I haven't seen that craze of SKR in audiences as it was for star MB.

Max to max who follow it are die hard ashishians aur baki bache hum sab pagal 😆

Star MB acco to me was the best cast ensemble I came across in any show. Like every character. Even jaydrath was a good choice. Even hidimba.

SKR somewhere lacks here.. Sulochana could have been someone better. Even surpankha. Dubbing of karthik's voice is not so convincing. Am not that convinced with Danish's acting yet.

So yes even if three things hold it there are other two things that drag it down..
maya_sm thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
@EternalStars, Plz dont say that. SP wont and cant pull off the show Siya Ke Ram abruptly before it ends as this is Ramayan based on Sita and not a daily Saas Bahu Soap which can be given an abrupt end without showing the main story till end.
Edited by mmurdeshwar - 9 years ago
ShasthaaPriyaa thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: mmurdeshwar

@EternalStars, Plz dont say that. SP wont and cant pull off the show Siya Ke Ram abruptly before it ends as this is Ramayan based on Sita and not a daily Saas Bahu Soap which can be given an abrupt end without showing the main story till end.


I did not say that.DD did.😆 They are cancelling repeats though.😡
ShasthaaPriyaa thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: daydreamers


No idea as such but on an average definitely below 2.

For trps there's a need for craze.. And mythology definitely isn't about craze at all times.

And I haven't seen that craze of SKR in audiences as it was for star MB.

Max to max who follow it are die hard ashishians aur baki bache hum sab pagal 😆

Star MB acco to me was the best cast ensemble I came across in any show. Like every character. Even jaydrath was a good choice. Even hidimba.

SKR somewhere lacks here.. Sulochana could have been someone better. Even surpankha. Dubbing of karthik's voice is not so convincing. Am not that convinced with Danish's acting yet.

So yes even if three things hold it there are other two things that drag it down..


I never watched MB.😆 Matlab show bandh hone ke baad I began watching repeats,tab I fell in love with that show.😆 Haan point..but anyways lets hope Lanka adhyay changes things a bit.😃
1087354 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Hello guys, sorry I couldn't post. I had guests over. Charvi, nice post on the eyes. The eyes are the mirror to your soul, good job! Milli di, yes, strength, happiness, and other such feelings only come from within, not the outside. And Janvhi di, post whenever, we are waiting. Now, time for the theme of the day!

The theme of today's episode is blindness. But no one in the Ramayan, currently, is blind, so how can the theme be blindness? Let me explain...

The episode starts in Panchavati, and Ravan, in the guise of a mendicant, is asking for alms from Sita. Sita wants to give alms, but at the same time is hesitant because she does not want to break her promise given to Lakshman. She then decides to fulfill her Raghukul Dharma, so she crosses the line. Ravan then reveals his true form, shocking Sita. Sita was blind to Ravan's real identity, and this fact is a big message that is very relevant in the Kali Yug. Nowadays, people who are really your enemies act like your friends, and you need to be careful of these people. And it is not like you can never find out a person's true identity. Sita was also given clues, like Ravan's behavior, posture, and attitude, but she overlooked them. So, look carefully and closely for clues.

Next, Mandodari and Vibhishan go to get help from their mother, Kaikesi, and tell their problem to her. Kaikesi, though, tells them that Ravan controls the Navagrahas, so how can anything bad happen to him. Vibhishan then tells her that wrong expectations make a person blind. From this scene, I learned that a mother always thinks that here child is perfect and the best, no matter what. A child can be bad, but a mother can never be bad because she always thinks good for her child.

Finally, the episode ends in Kishkindha. Hanuman meets Jambavant and tells him Sugreev's problem, and Jambavant agrees to help them. He goes to meet Sugreev, and tells him that the man who will shoot the seven trees down with one arrow will be able to kill Bali. Both Hanuman and Sugreev doubt such a person exists, and lament over the fact that Bali can not die now. The lesson I learned here is that whenever someone doubts the existence of God, He always comes, in some form or the other, to clear our doubts. I also came up with a symbolism for the seven trees. The seven trees each represent a chakra in our body, through which the inga and pingala nadis flow through. When all of the chakras are awakened(or pierced), we reach the feet of the Supreme Being(or reach to the conclusion that Ram is the person who will kill Bali).

That's all for today, and I hope you guys had a great weekend!

Gowri




Edited by shabari14 - 9 years ago
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Gowri good analysis and your symbolism of 7 trees really good. I am happy from giving the crux of the episode you are moving to symbolisms
@mili the conflicts that exists in us were in display in the episode and you have described them very well.
@DD waiting for your analysis. But let me post mine. It was a beautiful episode and let me tell you Shanta could not have been closed at the point where we were expecting it to close. She is needed. And yesterday once again it highlighted what is the price of the action of Shanta and who is going to bear it. What Shanta did or was forced to do is long running. And this is at the root of patriarchy at the root of maryada.
@Lakshmi SKR repeat is at 12 am. And repeats has not been cut down. SKR still has 4 solid repeats 12 am , 3am, 7am and 11:30 am. Not at all a bad number. And if the TRP holds move over 2 , hopefully we will get 11:30 pm slot back.
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
What was yesterday's episode. I was like feeling like whistling. Shanta, Shanta , Shanta this was the only thing I was murmuring in the whole episode. Raghukul ki maryada, Behen ka apman what dialogues what connectivity. Now what do they mean.
If you remember when Surpi was chasing Ram I had put in the post both Ram and Ravan are born when a woman crossed the line of maryada or rather a woman lured a man for personal benefit.
Now Ravan tells Ram has insulted his sister. Really. Did he insult her. Who asked her to run behind Ram who was telling in clear terms not to come behind him, he is married and he loves his wife dearly.
Who did the mistake Surpi and what is Ravan telling Ram committed a crime by insulting his sister.
Look at the interesting ways of Sanskriti. What did Shanta do. She did the same funda as Surpi. She lured a rishi from his tapasya. Rishisringa fell for her charm ( let us be blunt about it) and crossed the line of maryada. Same with vishravass who crossed the line of maryada with Kaikasi. Now the question is both these men fell for the women's charm and crossed the line of maryada. Is Sanskriti questioning the men who fell for the women's charm or Sanskriti questioning the women who went to lure men. Sanskriti does nothing. Because since marriage happened this hypocrisy of Sanskriti not questioning the man when he crosses the line of maryada is not exposed or questioned. And to ensure it is not exposed it keeps the Prakriti who does such activity also from harm. Neither Rishisrinanga, Vishravass, Kaikasi or Shanta is questioned even thought what happened in those relations is crossing the maryada.
Now comes the second line Sita says Raghukul ki maryada and no one has gone empty handed from Raghu nanadan's door. She is correct. Because Ram as a man has not only understood maryada in theory but through every action of his has practiced it. So for Sita Raghukul ki marayda is raghunandan's action. But what Sita doesn't know is how raghukul has bend this maryada to suit them as and when needed because she has not experienced it. And she will experience it once she is back. And then comes another thing. Whether kul ki maryada or breaking of vachan. Raghukul has crossed the line of maryada by sending women and its princess to lure a rishi and the king of raghukul has broken the vachan given to another king. Sanskriti has broken the maryada and Sanskriit has broken the vachan and both are kept under wraps.
And see now to bring forth the hypocrisy of Ayodhya, to expose the injustice of Ayodhya where Shanta was a victim of circumstances, only Kaikeyi's deed is exposed and Dasrath's ways are hidden Devi Lakshmi is breaking the vachan, and crossing the line of maryada. I said it is to expose Sanskriti, Prakriti is going to cross the line and that is what SKR showed exactly yesterday.
And yes she will be questioned. The woman who broke the vachan to uphold the maryada of raghukul will be questioned, will be forced to give AP, will be banished from Ayodhya. Her mistake she wanted to uphold what her kul stood for.
But where does Sanskriti loses in this game. Ram. The man who takes the brunt of Sanskriti's attack equally on himself.
His life started with prakriti doing treachery on Sanskriti. And his life is going to change with Sanskriti doing treachery on Prakriti. That is Ravan doing treachery on Sita.
And this is where Ram and Ravan differs. Ravan was born because of treachery, he carries forward treachery as he believes that is the way of life. His mother did treachery, so he also can do and see Kaikasi has no problem her son and daughter doing treachery. She only has problem with her sane son whom she tells not needed in Lanka. So once again Lanka is bad, but then it doesn't stop people from doing bad.
Ayodhya is bad, but as I said once again it wraps it badness in the sugar syrupy coat of maryada. And breaking this sugar syrupy coat is the hardest because as I said Ravan is bitter, but Ayodhya feels sugar but not sweet.
And Ram he learned the marayda of raghukul with vashisth and by the time he knew about Shanta and what happened to her as a teenage boy the values were deep rooted in him and he carried forward those in action.
But what happened to his sister is going to come back to him. Behen ka apman. Yes the society of Ayodhya has degraded his sister also. Making her a weapon to get a boy child. How will he revenge that insult which the society heaped on his sister. By not taking any loop hole the Sanskriti has given him. Yes he banishes Sita from kingdom, but not from his heart. He remains loyal to her in body, mind and spirit even when Sanskriti asks him in multiple ways to marry a second time. Everytime he finds his own unique solution to close that loophole. Actually Ram is a problem for Sanskriti because he doesn't fall for Sanskriti's tricks and exposes Sanskriti and its double ways.
He remains within maryada always, just like the Sanskriti expects a woman to be. His loyalty towards his better half is a slap in the face of Sanskriti who thinks if a man falls for a woman it happens because men are like that. He shows all men are not like that and need not be like that. They also need to exercise self control and be loyal to their wives as much as they expect loyalty from their wives. And his revenge to a society that insulted his sister, is by mocking them and exposing their double standards. By establishing a system that is same for man and woman.
That's Ram for you. As much as I understood him through Sita's eyes till this point. I hope the CVs will open up his chara more.
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
One more thing. Now I understood why patriarichy wanted to keep Ram always under their wraps. Always preferred to show him as male chavunist. Because if his true essence is exposed then they are in danger 😆😆😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".