In wish and hope people spend their entire life Urmila - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

30

Views

3.4k

Users

14

Likes

126

Frequent Posters

Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#21
For me, Sita's decision of going with Ram is more human nature than the patnidharm alone. When Ram and Sita are made ready to be the king and queen of Ayodhya, suddenly its stopped by Kaikeyi, which is merely an insult for Ram and Sita. They are forced to face this in spite of no fault of them. How can Sita stay behind in Ayodhya, where she may be further insulted by Bharath coronation?

In yesterday episode itself they showed how the praja changes the content of the matter. Kaikeyi's first vachan is to make Bharath king and second one to send Ram for vanvas. But the common man told, first one to send Ram to forest. Among this people, how would have sita led a peaceful life?


Frosty_Moon thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#22
Beautiful post dear..
Urmilla stole the show with her dialogue..
Yukti did it brilliantly...
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#23
@Ramya that is why in FB the words by Janak were shown. For your self respect if you have to give Agnipareeksha give it. That decision was for her self respect which will be intact with she accompanying Ram to forest.
Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#24
@Shruthi: Yes, that is the part which differs Sita from Urmila. In a way, Urmila was not insulted as Sita, so she stayed back.
Cool_wonder thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: Ramyalaxmi

For me, Sita's decision of going with Ram is more human nature than the patnidharm alone. When Ram and Sita are made ready to be the king and queen of Ayodhya, suddenly its stopped by Kaikeyi, which is merely an insult for Ram and Sita. They are forced to face this in spite of no fault of them. How can Sita stay behind in Ayodhya, where she may be further insulted by Bharath coronation?

In yesterday episode itself they showed how the praja changes the content of the matter. Kaikeyi's first vachan is to make Bharath king and second one to send Ram for vanvas. But the common man told, first one to send Ram to forest. Among this people, how would have sita led a peaceful life?



OMG😲..I never though of this point ya

How can Sita stay behind in Ayodhya, where she may be further insulted by Bharath coronation?

This is so true, Sita can never stay where her husband was humiliated by his stepmother. That place will simply not remain the same for her...

and after this she cannot accept any please from the same place which has been abandoned by her husband.

I nver doubted Mata Sita's decision, if Mata would not have followed lord ram, There would have been no Ramayan, no killing of Ravan😆...

This all comes down ro Destiny ...
The other day, i was jut telling my Mom, that Lord had to go through so much to establish Dharma and that too in Terta Yug(Silver Age)...
Can we have the calmness like Ram ever after facing Hardships : Very very difficult

Thanks for putting up this point

deejagi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: Ramyalaxmi

@Shruthi: Samsaram oru minsaram movie directed by Visu and not by Balachander.
I liked Lakshmi acting in that movie. As far as I remember, the movie is remade in hindi too with Rekha in lead role.

Its in almost all languages. I was watched it in Tamil, Kannada & Telugu & Hindi. Not sure of others as don't understand any other Indian language 😊
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#27
@jaya it is in Malayalam also. But Tamil takes the cake. Lakshmi gave a beautiful performance.
Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: Cool_wonder


OMG😲..I never though of this point ya

How can Sita stay behind in Ayodhya, where she may be further insulted by Bharath coronation?

This is so true, Sita can never stay where her husband was humiliated by his stepmother. That place will simply not remain the same for her...

and after this she cannot accept any please from the same place which has been abandoned by her husband.

I nver doubted Mata Sita's decision, if Mata would not have followed lord ram, There would have been no Ramayan, no killing of Ravan😆...

This all comes down ro Destiny ...
The other day, i was jut telling my Mom, that Lord had to go through so much to establish Dharma and that too in Terta Yug(Silver Age)...
Can we have the calmness like Ram ever after facing Hardships : Very very difficult

Thanks for putting up this point

Welcome 😊.
@bold: This is what I feel "time dependent". In kaliyug, even Ram can't be exactly the same. 😉

Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#29
@Jaya: I was not aware about the movie in other languages. Thanks for mentioning. Its an award winning movie and I saw it in DD channel. I miss those golden days where DD telecasted all award winning regional movies on every saturday. 😊
Edited by Ramyalaxmi - 9 years ago
attubaby thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#30
as posted by members here, i also had a doubt on y did Sita go. Y couldnt she stay back. More or less, she was following patni dharm. I don't know wat they mean by Stri Dharm in SKR bcoz they repaeteldy say that ek stri ka dharm uske pati ki seva krna hota h aur uska sath dena hota h...but anyways..
wen I had dis doubt related to Sita in mind, I tried to get the answer by thinkin abt al the sitatn and scenario..and I also came up with the same thing that a difference existed between exile of Ram and Lakshman. Ram's exile was more of a sentence that is given to him (I don't know if i am using the right word 'sentence' for the situatn!)...how can a wife remain in the same place wen her husband is ordered to follow the hardships for 14 years...the approach was more like- if my husband is all set to go to the forest, I will accompany him as well. How can I live the life of a lavish princess wen my husband is living like a hermit with no fault of him at all. If I have promised to be with him in happiness, his sorrows and hardships are also mine.

while in the case of Urmila, it was a different approach. Lakshman did not get the exile by the rule of law (m sayin law coz vachan in raghukul riti was something that one has to abide by in any way). He himself took the decsn and was goin along to do the seva of his brother..his exile was mission-based...and the duty of Urmila in dis situtan was to support her husband in accomplishin the mission, which she did by stayin back.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".