Originally posted by: Justlikethat1
There is so little actual material on Sita and her sisters before marriage this could have been a great way to add some characterization given there is good creativity and make a believable story with the Characters. But the CVs failed magnificently in this.
It is hard to believe as to how childish and immature Maandvi has been portrayed. Be it her complaint of not having 'the choice' afforded to Sita or her rejection of Bharath or the way she reacted to his apology.. Why would Maandvi think Bharath would be ready to marry her after such display? It looks like she gets to choose but Bharath has no such luxury! The hypocrisy of it all.
For once I agree with Chandrabhaga. Maandvi just goes around complaining and changing her mind..It is hard not to want to give her a whack!!
Why is it that all four brothers and sisters have to have a love story? Is it not ok for atleast one of these pairs to have a marriage based on the fact that it was ordained such?
BTW, in what way would have King Janak said no to Raja Dasharath if Maandvi had persisted? Shruthkeerthi and Urmila's marriage would have stopped if Maandvi was not married (She being the elder one to them). It was totally unnecessary to have this complication with Bharath and Maandvi.
The good thing was that Lakshman was extremely happy with the proposal and I do like how Ram looks out for Bharath at all times, protecting, counseling and guiding him. There was a very beautiful thread of loyalty, respect and love that all the four brothers shared and I like the fact that this is shown in subtle ways.
But will they kinda hurry up with the next ceremony instead of having a no-story turn to a drama for 2 days?
PS: The prediction of Sita's vanvaas by the fortune teller does get mentioned by Sita herself in Ramayan. She quotes this incident to explain to Shri Ram how she would not be afraid of the jungle because she had already thought about it and had decided that she would like it in a forest with its tranquility. I am hoping that this is just a lead up to later and does not cause any unnecessary drama like today.
Actually, I've enjoyed Mandavi being the X-factor in all of this - throwing in more mystery in this than was in the original. To that end, I'm a tad disappointed that she changed her opinion so easily & quickly - was hoping to have her hold out for at least a week, even go thru some last minute changes of mind - but no such luck 😈
However, the epic is nebulous about whether Lakshman or Bharat is the older of the 2. Nonetheless, even if Mandavi withdrew herself from the marriage proposal, that would only affect Shrutakirti. Urmila, being Seeradhwaj's daughter, just needed Sita to be married, regardless of whether Mandavi got married or not. Shrutakirti would have been blocked had Mandavi not gotten married, since both were Kushadhwaj's daughters. Of course, it's an open question whether Lakshman could have married if Bharat didn't.
One more thing that struck me - in the episode, Janak telling Dasharath that he was worried about his daughters not being together after marriage. Why would that have been an issue then? If that was important to him, all he would have needed to do would be to offer all 4 of them to whoever Sita married, if there weren't 4 brothers involved. Usually, in that era, there were 2 schools of thought that kings followed if they had multiple daughters/nieces. Either they would try to spread them out and get as many kingdoms involved in matrimonial alliances, or they would want to send them all into a single family to keep them together. But since polygamy was not unusual - heck, Dasharath himself had 353 wives - keeping the 4 girls together would have been no big deal for Janak.
P.S. Incidentally, is Kushadhwaj's wife named in the original epic? I don't recall the name 'Chandrabhaga'. In RS Ramayan, Sita had a friend Chandraprabha, but that was about it.