OMG! A case against Lord Rama, for abandoning Sita - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

69

Views

6.6k

Users

27

Likes

170

Frequent Posters

mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#11
They can surely sue all of them, provided the case s filed in the right time zone. Treta Yuga's cases have nothing to do in Kali yuga
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#12
Doesn't court have better things to do. Nirbhaya's case is still in supreme court. And the scams running in the country are still with lower courts.
Now why should we take this case that belongs to Tetra Yuga 😆😆
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#13
They can invent a time machine & go back to Treta Yuga to file a case. 😆

shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#14
No Meena I guess they are creating a backlog to get into the guniness book of world records 😆😆😆. The longest pending case known to humanity. Why did Ram abandon Sita which needs to proved conclusively based on facts and figures which is not happening and so pending from tetra yuga😆😆
Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

No Meena I guess they are creating a backlog to get into the guniness book of world records 😆😆😆. The longest pending case known to humanity. Why did Ram abandon Sita which needs to proved conclusively based on facts and figures which is not happening and so pending from tetra yuga😆😆

Can I counter file this as an additional proof for Rama setu bridge?😉
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

No Meena I guess they are creating a backlog to get into the guniness book of world records 😆😆😆. The longest pending case known to humanity. Why did Ram abandon Sita which needs to proved conclusively based on facts and figures which is not happening and so pending from tetra yuga😆😆


With almost 300 versions of Ramayan, no wonder this case will go on for Yugas...😆
Panel of lawyers can keep on arguing first to decide which version can be authentic. 😆
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#17
@Meena the first proof has to be whether uttar Ramayana was written by valmiki. That has to be proven conclusively. Because if valmiki didn't write it, then the case holds no water😆😆 because copyright of Ramayan is with valmiki right.
If it is not written by Valmiki then case can be dismissed on grounds that abandoning of Sita was the figment of imagination of the author who ever wrote it and has nothing to do with original Ramayana😆😆
@Ramya Ram Sethu please 😆😆
Edited by shruthiravi - 9 years ago
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#18
@ shruthi, this case is not that easy as it seems. Ramayan was narrated to Valmiki by Naradji. Even Lord Shiva narrated it to Parvati. So Naradji & Lord Shiva knew it first. They are beyond the reach of our courts. 😆

lifeiscrazy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#19
my first reaction🤣
joh jaruri cases hai woh bees pachis saal se pending mein hai🤣
who is that stupid lawyer who filed this case???
publicity stunt
Bhagwan ko bji nahi chodtae🤣
aise case file karne walae ko and usae accept kane walon ko hum kya samjhae
lagta hai kal raat kisi pagal kutta ne kaat li😆😆😆😆
Arijit007 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#20
what a stupid publicity stunt, aur koi kaam dhanda nahi thaa kya us lawyer kaa?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".