OMG! A case against Lord Rama, for abandoning Sita - Page 7

Anyway guys it was great discussion especially aditi 97 :-) Thanks you for replying to my posts and a healthy discussion. keep rocking guys -- enjoy 😉

Originally posted by: Ami25

U still can not buy me into accepting that Lord Rama was right in doing so. whereever he abandoned her -- he left her !! and he didnt even bother to see how she was doing !! yeah it is not right to have a debate here ! U are spot on that. everyone is judged by their actions -- and if rama was worng Supreme formless god must have judged him for sure. We are not here to file a case against him when he is not alive anymore---

See.I mentioned already that I won't compel anyone to accept Ram as Good. But I can't do anything who blind to accept the truth.Raja Ram left his wife for street gossiping. but he was truthful to his Praja. At his Region, no woman get mistreated, harassed, raped. No premature deaths, No poverty, No theft, No murders. . As a husband, his commitments may debatable. but As a King, He fulfilled his reliabilities to all citizens including Sita. So assuming like Sita suffered poverty, Harassments, etc,etc... is imagination. Ram was truthful to his citizens. So barring Sita is big joke.For His word, He left his loyal brother Lakshman. That's why Lakshman attained Jeeva Samathi.Ram wasn't man who looking out benefits. He is the man of conscience. He followed his heart whether it favored him or not.



BTW,I want an answer from you. (I hate to question Mata Sita. but sadly I does)"Ram left His pregnant wife. But Sita also left her 12 years old sons. Isn't it wrong in your POV. I like to hear your opinion about a mother leaving her 12 years old children?"



P.SI'm not Buddhist so you don't have to mention Ram as God to me.

Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS

See.I mentioned already that I won't compel anyone to accept Ram as Good. But I can't do anything who blind to accept the truth.Raja Ram left his wife for street gossiping. but he was truthful to his Praja. At his Region, no woman get mistreated, harassed, raped. No premature deaths, No poverty, No theft, No murders. . As a husband, his commitments may debatable. but As a King, He fulfilled his reliabilities to all citizens including Sita. So assuming like Sita suffered poverty, Harassments, etc,etc... is imagination. Ram was truthful to his citizens. So barring Sita is big joke.For His word, He left his loyal brother Lakshman. That's why Lakshman attained Jeeva Samathi.Ram wasn't man who looking out benefits. He is the man of conscience. He followed his heart whether it favored him or not.



BTW,I want an answer from you. (I hate to question Mata Sita. but sadly I does)"Ram left His pregnant wife. But Sita also left her 12 years old sons. Isn't it wrong in your POV. I like to hear your opinion about a mother leaving her 12 years old children?"



P.SI'm not Buddhist so you don't have to mention Ram as God to me.

Originally posted by: Ami25

She had enough in the end !! she suffered alot after marrying him ! Thats what i feel as woman. She knew her sons are safer with their dad than being with her in the jungle ! she just didnt wanna stay with ram.When society, including Rama put her through enough pain and suffering - she just didnt wanna stay with lord rama, or in the society as a queen or as a mom !! her sons were not orphans like she was abandoned into jungle by her husband ! she had enough( there is a limit to a woman"s patience) , society of that time and her husband tested every single nerve in her body. I feel the pain she is been through, this is my answer !! but bravo u find one fault in Seeta !! and glad u did.

But Lord rama is still way ahead -- I am still with her

Originally posted by: Ami25

She had enough in the end !! she suffered alot after marrying him ! Thats what i feel as woman. She knew her sons are safer with their dad than being with her in the jungle ! she just didnt wanna stay with ram.When society, including Rama put her through enough pain and suffering - she just didnt wanna stay with lord rama, or in the society as a queen or as a mom !! her sons were not orphans like she was abandoned into jungle by her husband ! she had enough( there is a limit to a woman"s patience) , society of that time and her husband tested every single nerve in her body. I feel the pain she is been through, this is my answer !! but bravo u find one fault in Seeta !! and glad u did.

But Lord rama is still way ahead -- I am still with her

@bold: This is the answer I looked at you. May be people genders typically made to look their choice merits.@Brown:I'm not finding any fault at Sita. I've so much respect for her as much as Ram. it's all about perspective. in fact I heard numerous articles, theories, Facts of Anti Ramaism projecting him as bad husband. once I got chance to read Ramayana. my questions are answered. so I understood Sita Ram decisions.


after I read questions about Ram's Pati Dharma.I couldn't find any single accusations about Motherhood. That's why I find most of those posts meant to create gender wars than debating Right. someone may feel that one shouldn't compare Sita abandoned premature kids with Rama abandoned well matured Sita. one can't prove which act was cruel and which was justifiable? it's all about perspective and POV. my point is while reading Ramayana, one may find Ram act was reasonable. even if he couldn't, definitely it would help him to his Pov than reading mere imaginations created by later scholars. That's why I mentioned ' Read Ramayana before debate'.

^continued...

I never said that Sita never suffered. if my previous post meant like that,I didn't mean that. I meant she was never suffered physically as people accusing. you asked me question. same I'm asking at you. when Ramayana claiming Sita was hurt. but why didn't you accept Ram as Maryada Purshottam. see, I respect both of them. they both inspired me By their truthful, honesty, courage. I'm not the person who judging based on gender. in fact, I don't like few Ram's actions. (if You read my topic 'Shambuka', you may understand that). I accept every truth.

Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS

^continued...

I never said that Sita never suffered. if my previous post meant like that,I didn't mean that. I meant she was never suffered physically as people accusing. you asked me question. same I'm asking at you. when Ramayana claiming Sita was hurt. but why didn't you accept Ram as Maryada Purshottam. see, I respect both of them. they both inspired me By their truthful, honesty, courage. I'm not the person who judging based on gender. in fact, I don't like few Ram's actions. (if You read my topic 'Shambuka', you may understand that). I accept every truth.

There are so many serious cases pending and this one thinks it's alright to mess about -_-

Originally posted by: JustMySelf

so ya there will be fools who might file case against these too
from their perverted soch 😆

Originally posted by: ._Pari_.

😆