Srimad Ramayan : EDT Week 6 ~ 5th Feb - 9th Feb 2024 - Page 15

Saw the episode finally! I still think they’re rushing it a bit. I loved the brothers scene and RamSiya scene today(albeit it was short) I’m glad for the change in costumes for them.

Also this is stupid question but why was Manthara in the court but not any of the ladies? The mothers nor Sita? Was that a custom that ladies weren’t allowed in the Rajyasabha? I found it interesting that Manthara was there and none of the other ladies were.

Originally posted by: cuteamanboy

why didn't urmila come along with lakshman to see off her brothers and sisters

Actress playing Urmila is always missing from shooting if you watch carefully

During Sita swayamvar also

During marriage rituals also she is not there with 3 sisters sometimes

Originally posted by: Tani91

Saw the episode finally! I still think they’re rushing it a bit. I loved the brothers scene and RamSiya scene today(albeit it was short) I’m glad for the change in costumes for them.

Also this is stupid question but why was Manthara in the court but not any of the ladies? The mothers nor Sita? Was that a custom that ladies weren’t allowed in the Rajyasabha? I found it interesting that Manthara was there and none of the other ladies were.

Ram-Siya scene was bit better. Good to see a costume change for sure. She looks nice today.

Manthara looked kinda funny villain lol. 😂 🤣

Originally posted by: RamAayeHain

Why would his children would fight for throne 🤔

Mahabharat to Gandhari and Shakuni ki situation ki wajah se hua tha start at least, agar bhishma ne pratigya nahi li hoti to wo shaadi karte and hire milta throne ko, vyaas ji ko ambika ambalika ki help nahi karni padti to give hire and pandu dhritarashtra vidur exist hi nahi karte

Mahabharat was for restoring Dharma like how Ramayan was for Maryada , even if the scenarios were changed MB would've happened cause it was destined to happen.....Lord Vishnu would've taken birth as Lord Krishna to restore Dharma in that Yug

If Bhishma had married bika and Ambalika , their sons could've had a dcivil war and that could've been called as MB too

This was the answer i got when i once posted "MB wouldn't have happened if Bhishma had become the king"

Actually Vaidehi ( the actress playing Urmila ) was sick and hospitalized during wedding sequences, that's why she was absent.

I remember in skr the actress playing the character of Shrutakirti was absent in one of the scenes but they used a body double for the scene similarly in rsr the actress playing the character of Shrutakirti was absent in one of the scenes they used a body double in brc ramayan actress playing the character of Shrutakirti was absent during one of the scenes they used a body double

in swastik show, ram siya ke lav kush the actresses playing the character of Urmila and Shrutakirti were absent during the last episodes but they didn't use a body double

https://www.indiaforums.com/redirectUrl?id=118747

i am posting this link here again, the theory of kaikeyi and manthara being cousins, through for me, it seems a folk tale

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

Mahabharat was for restoring Dharma like how Ramayan was for Maryada , even if the scenarios were changed MB would've happened cause it was destined to happen.....Lord Vishnu would've taken birth as Lord Krishna to restore Dharma in that Yug

If Bhishma had married bika and Ambalika , their sons could've had a dcivil war and that could've been called as MB too

This was the answer i got when i once posted "MB wouldn't have happened if Bhishma had become the king"

Of course if lord destined it then it bound to happen but maybe the story would have been very different

Bhagwat Geeta ka saar to kaise bhi mil sakta tha 🤔

Originally posted by: DiamondLife

Can you please tell me -

What does Shatrugan represent?

Bharat represents Sudharshan Chakra, Shatrugan represents Panchajanya Shankha of Vishnu..Shivji mentioned that in intial episode at their birth time..

Out of topic,I want to share an interesting tale with regard to padukas given importance and sat on the throne of Ayodhya during vanavaas..my granny used to tell me in my childhood.Once Lord Vishnu entered his sacred Santorum of Vaikunta with slippers ,then Chakra and Conch scolded Vishnu's slippers for entering the holy place ,saddened by it ,the padukas complained and Vishnu promised that his padukas will be paid obeisance by both conch and Chakra in his coming avatar and that’s how Ram’s padukas were kept on king’s simhasan with both Bharatha and Shatrughan paying reverence to it...