Karma and in Bidaai:Mod's note PG5 - Page 3

😆

I think during Indu and Andu's track, Bidai's TRP will be very high 😆

God, am imagining "Pa' dance (suggested by Laxmi) of Indu and Andu....

And am still imagining the 'cha cha cha chor....' belt step between Indu & Vasu 😆!

Originally posted by: vishmewell

I would rather not call "HIndu" a religion because it is way of life. HIndu Philosophy is based on Karma theory. Good Karma, Bad Karma. In layman's words, one's rewards in life or sufferings are equal proportions to one's own acts.

One determines their own destiny according to Hindu Philosophy.

Yudhishtir aka Dharma Raj the oldest of Pandavas who is an ICON for truth and dharma fell for the temptation and obsession of gambling and lost his riches, then his army, then his whole kingdom. But that did not even stop him from ending the gambling game until he gambled away his brothers one after the other and at last even Daupadi his crowned queen and wife.

Although Pandavas were chosen to be favorites of Lord Krishna, still were exiled for 13 years. Could Lord Krishna not averted their exile? He could, but would not as Dharam Raj did Sauda of his brother's and wife. Hence, must pay for his actions.

First, Sadhana in Bidaai also has to go into exile for her misjudgment and not testifying in favor of Ranvir because she could not lie. Dharam Raj also faced similar challenge during Kurukshetra war. Lord Krishna himself prompted Dharma Raj to shout a lie "Ashwadhama Athaha, Kunjaraha" the kunjaraha was rather in a low tone to establish dharma. May be not lying for a good cause or dharma is also not good?

Secondly, as Dharam Raj's actions of gambling away his brother's and wife are deemed fit, so is Sadhana's making sauda of marriage is also deemed fit. Hence the burning in fire?

It is only the epic Sita of Ramayan in the human form who remained unharmed by fire!

Thus justice of karma theory always prevails! These aspects of Mahabharat and Ramayan are depicted very well in Bidaai.

Also, beautifully established that a mother is mother. She can never do harm to her own children. Sometimes taking tough stand is a necessary evil as a mother's role.

Ya I know Arjun and Krishna are Nar Narayan. As far as Mahabharatha is concerned, I think Arjun got moksha after that, as whatever he did, he did for his Karma. Even the 'cheating' part, he did bcos Krishna himself asked him to do it. So y would he be punished for it when he just obeyed God's command? And he did that to contribute towards the prevalance of overall good, he just blindly followed God's path. Not only that, in Hindu religion, we dont have hell and heaven like many other religions. Our belief is what ever you have to enjoy, or whatever you have to suffer, it can only be done on earth as there is no place which can give pleasure and pain as earth. So even if someone does something wrong, he will just keep taking rebirth till he finishes off his karma. But I dont thik Arjun took any more rebirths after that. So I think he got moksha thereafter.

@ vishmewell true

as u mentioned for a gud purpose if sumone lies that is not a sin there are alott of example in mahabharat and Lord Krishna himself propagates arjun for his dharma . we can say mahabharat contains much philosphical material. and we can also say So if Lord Ram was idealistic then Lord Krishna was realistic.

dharma and Karma , if rightly understood and rightly applied, make a person's
life prosper.

good Dharma = good Karma