Why is Sadhna tensed or confused? - Page 4

So what were the discussions about everyday?Lying or blaming?Cos here and at RS blog all thats being said is SAdhana shouldn't lie cos her character isn't such and now you say its about blaming!

Originally posted by: smitha80

So what were the discussions about everyday?Lying or blaming?Cos here and at RS blog all thats being said is SAdhana shouldn't lie cos her character isn't such and now you say its about blaming!

Isn't blaming another person called lying ??

I think that lying to save someone from a barbarian and lying in court should be treated differently. By the way, if someone is confident that he/she did not do injustice, then why must the support of lie be taken? How can someone have so much faith in something as weak as a lie?

Originally posted by: Crimson_Sky

I think that lying to save someone from a barbarian and lying in court should be treated differently. By the way, if someone is confident that he/she did not do injustice, then why must the support of lie be taken? How can someone have so much faith in something as weak as a lie?

Ranveer is not a criminal and Chander did twist the truth. Instead of investigating this point or cross-questioning in the court-room to prove him wrong ...forcing Sadhana to lie is so silly. DS is a big time loser.

Ok if blaming is called lying then acc to the above para if that lie preserves peace or the outcome is only good,then shouldn't she lie?From that para even God himself altered the words and now she is not above God is she?

REALLY I AGREE !!!! i don't understand why sadhna is so confused?? also i don't understand mamaji , they all know ranveer, and also knoe ki uski koi galat intension nahi thi , the why is this confusion????

Originally posted by: smitha80

Ok if blaming is called lying then acc to the above para if that lie preserves peace or the outcome is only good,then shouldn't she lie?From that para even God himself altered the words and now she is not above God is she?

How is the outcome only good...only for Rajavnsh family but what about Chander and his family ? By putting blame on another person, is he not going to be punished for something he has not done.

smitha80, I have read the Old and New Testaments ... I think there needs to be some corrections there in your statement. Though I would not like to go deeper into it here. Just to give my 2cents on an episode 😊

WHats the comparison between Chander and Ranvir anyway?Ranvir is a good person.Chander by deciding to go into this goon thing already must have done something wrong and that is why he is called a goon.He must have killed,injured some people so how can he be called innocent.

As I already mentioned before Ranvir should have let the goon do his thing and instead of helping her should have just waited after making a call to the police regarding this teasing thing.But he didn't.That itself differentiate him from Chander and the other one.

Originally posted by: smitha80

WHats the comparison between Chander and Ranvir anyway?Ranvir is a good person.Chander by deciding to go into this goon thing already must have done something wrong and that is why he is called a goon.He must have killed,injured some people so how can he be called innocent.

As I already mentioned before Ranvir should have let the goon do his thing and instead of helping her should have just waited after making a call to the police regarding this teasing thing.But he didn't.That itself differentiate him from Chander and the other one.

Who's calling Chander innocent. He will be punished for his own crimes but not for the one he has not committed.

Ranveer is not a criminal ....in-fact a very good and kind person but he did go too far. No one is above the law.