LOL wow. Seems like it's time for some English lessons.
Although I don't need to interfere, I would like to clarify one thing. In IF's forums, people create posts in which they posts links, so that people can view the links, and then give feedbacks on the links. The same was done in this post. Her comment was on the performance in the video.
If we are really talking about grammar, she would not say, "Ranjeet is amazing"; that would be very general. Yes, Ranjeet is amazing, but to emphasize what is being referred to in particular(the video she just watched), she said "He WAS amazing!" .
An example would be a person who compliments another person by saying, "You sing well." . If one says this, they are saying that someone sings well, but how did they know that the person sings well? Obvious enough, by listening to the person sing. Thus, at that point of time ( after listening to the song), the person would say " Wow, you sang the song well." not "Wow you sing the song well". I guess sunom interpreted it in another way, but Simi said what one would say after watching something amazing.
These were just my two cents. I didn't need to interfere, but I felt that someone needed to clarify the miscommunication because it isn't nice to accuse someone of something that they haven't done or something that has been misinterpreted. 😊
Edited by Priyanka_AAIICH - 15 years ago
