The power of a pen...... - Page 3

Before i say anything, plz dont generalize me as Pro Sanaya, Pro Ashish, Pro Paro or Pro Rudra,,,🤔

Everyone in my family watches the show and they dont like Rudra's character,, just bcoz one person does not approve of Paro, is it sensible enough to generalize EACH AND EVERY ONE,,,
as far as i am concerned,,, i watch the show for entertainment,, sometimes i relate to paro, sometimes to Rudra, i could understand paro in the friday's and monday's episode, but then again tuesday's episode left me puzzled, so i hav to agree with u here,,,

But i hav seen many members trying to defend Rudra too,, so isnt their pen powerful too,, y point out only Paro defenders????😕

Originally posted by: Zeeliciousxo

I agree, I posted the same thing on someone's thread yesterday. If many people are feeling a huge disconnect from the female lead at such a crucial point in the story then clearly the CVs are doing something wrong right??

My family (grandparents, parents, aunt and uncle, cousins) and a few friends watch RR and this week all of them do not understand Paro and are wondering why she is being so contradictory. They are especially annoyed with the way she is letting Laila stay in the haveli, they are saying it is "beyond stupid" (my mom's words not mine, so shaant) to let your partner's ex-lover stay in your haveli even if she won't affect your relationship - that is not the point. Since I like playing the devil's advocate I tried defending Paro and said Laila needs protection, but my grandpa just asked if there is no one else that can give Laila protection...does the BSD only have one officer?? And who is Paro to decide whether Laila stays in the haveli or not (she is not an elder nor an owner of the haveli so as she herself asks what right does she have to make such decisions)?? Why can't Papa Ranawat take action and order Junior Ranawat to take Laila to the BSD headquarters and put her under protection there??

The TRP audience has definitely felt disconnected from Rudra as well before - my grandpa used to say that Rudra is too angry and so was often not interested in watching him in his angry avatar. He became more interested in RR when Rudra became slightly mellow/kind, and Paro was a character he always found to be understandable and kind...

Now he's annoyed because he doesn't understand Paro's actions and it upsets him that because of her unclear actions her relationship with Rudra is crumbling. He HATES Laila. And you cannot say my grandpa doesn't understand Paro because he's a man, let me just say that he's not your typical man. And my mom, aunt, grandma and a few friends are frustrated with Paro as well.

The CVs need to find a good balance with both Rudra and Paro if they want to attract the TRP audience in big numbers. It is hard to feel connected to both characters at times, though I will definitely say that Rudra's characterization is more consistent than Paro's. Paro fans need to demand consistency in Paro's character as well from the CVs, does she not deserve it!!

They need to keep laila with parud...and indian shows are not high on logic anyway.Otherwise cant rudra himself say to paro,"laila can be provided with protection elsewhere too?"
And paro did not decide that laila will live there...she merely said if laila does not live in the haweli then she wont ever be able to forgive herself and rudra.
And I repeat...may be paro supporters dont think she is inconsistent, or may be they think the contradiction and bipolar behaviour goes with the situation and that paro is understandable...I personally think insecurity makes humans really illogical.So people who defend or support her dont need to demand anything unless they themselves dont see or feel the need of that demand.

i agree with you eve partially

Originally posted by: soulspirit

Before i say anything, plz dont generalize me as Pro Sanaya, Pro Ashish, Pro Paro or Pro Rudra,,,🤔

Everyone in my family watches the show and they dont like Rudra's character,, just bcoz one person does not approve of Paro, is it sensible enough to generalize EACH AND EVERY ONE,,,
as far as i am concerned,,, i watch the show for entertainment,, sometimes i relate to paro, sometimes to Rudra, i could understand paro in the friday's and monday's episode, but then again tuesday's episode left me puzzled, so i hav to agree with u here,,,

But i hav seen many members trying to defend Rudra too,, so isnt their pen powerful too,, y point out only Paro defenders????😕

Originally posted by: LOLitaPawar

They need to keep laila with parud...and indian shows are not high on logic anyway.Otherwise cant rudra himself say to paro,"laila can be provided with protection elsewhere too?"
And paro did not decide that laila will live there...she merely said if laila does not live in the haweli then she wont ever be able to forgive herself and rudra.
And I repeat...may be paro supporters dont think she is inconsistent, or may be they think the contradiction and bipolar behaviour goes with the situation and that paro is understandable...I personally think insecurity makes humans really illogical.So people who defend or support her dont need to demand anything unless they themselves dont see or feel the need of that demand.

Originally posted by: LOLitaPawar

They need to keep laila with parud...and indian shows are not high on logic anyway.Otherwise cant rudra himself say to paro,"laila can be provided with protection elsewhere too?"
And paro did not decide that laila will live there...she merely said if laila does not live in the haweli then she wont ever be able to forgive herself and rudra.
And I repeat...may be paro supporters dont think she is inconsistent, or may be they think the contradiction and bipolar behaviour goes with the situation and that paro is understandable...I personally think insecurity makes humans really illogical.So people who defend or support her dont need to demand anything unless they themselves dont see or feel the need of that demand.

Originally posted by: ttt1

They need to keep laila with parud...and indian shows are not high on logic anyway.Otherwise cant rudra himself say to paro,"laila can be provided with protection elsewhere too?"
And paro did not decide that laila will live there...she merely said if laila does not live in the haweli then she wont ever be able to forgive herself and rudra.
And I repeat...may be paro supporters dont think she is inconsistent, or may be they think the contradiction and bipolar behaviour goes with the situation and that paro is understandable...I personally think insecurity makes humans really illogical.So people who defend or support her dont need to demand anything unless they themselves dont see or feel the need of that demand.
Why cant they be happy? To you may be its inconceivable and to me personally it is too, but not everybody thinks like us.And many people who like/adore/support/defend paro have made posts asking the creatives to explain and write her character in a better manner too...just because they understand and are happy with her right now does not mean they are over indulgent mothers or blind followers.
And dont think too deeply about the phrases paro defenders and rudra defenders or supporters 😆 ...I just mean people who relate to or can understand or love or like one character more than the other on a general basis.

Eveline, Nice observation. I am one of those people who watched the episode and felt Paro's words and actions were contradictory.

Originally posted by: -Sanayaholic-

True, the Trp audience doesn't analyze the show and characters like us.

However what I feel is that without even analyzing there were people who understood where Paro was coming from and even related to her and there were also people who couldn't make sense of Paro's behavior. This just shows differing point of views and opinions. For some Paro's behavior clicked for some it didn't. I personally think Paro's characterization isn't as bad as many perceive.

Agreed some might connect with her, some might not and likewise with Rudra too. But to be honest I have seen more Paro frustration threads here (and in real too, the people I know , sorry about that), than we don't get Rudra threads. I was just trying to point out one thing, the cvs need to pull up their socks as far as the clarity of Paro is concerned and if we truly love them, I feel we should at least get a message across that you have worked on Rudy and it shows now its time to work on Paro too...just my pov

Originally posted by: deep0909

Eveline, Nice observation. I am one of those people who watched the episode and felt Paro's words and actions were contradictory.

But when I read some of the posts from princess sunara, Moronskimallika and sanayaisbest. I did get an alternative view point. I had not thought about. But I found their view point very valid and explains what I thought were contradictory actions.

But I can see how people do behave like this in real life too. And I have personal experience in this one :-)

I tell myself I will behave one way and then in the actual situation, I get emotional and behave in the exact way I said I wouldn't. So to me Paro reflected an ordinary human being there...

And so yeah, I did change my opinion. But one should change their opinion when a better opinion that fits and is valid comes along...

Agreed, but how many of the general public have access to such better opinions that will fit an argument is my point...in the absence of such mind changing presentations they are left with the impressions we all were left with...you in a sense validate my post...