Originally posted by: Sangs49
My pov, I enjoy the forum because I get to see different views. This serial irrespective of the length of each episode or length in months the serial is aired, it has some good story line, beautiful characterization. I am not interested in many other serials where they discuss what needs to be cooked for lunch or breakfast and some one adds salt or water or spil milk to create domestic tamasha. Now these types of serial have long life , so what? The length r time they are available does it increase my emotional or intellectual need. NO. A big NO. So I do not see them and I notice there is no disscussion of such serilsi in this forum.
Point is enjoy different interpretation as it is available.no body is asking anyone to change their preception it's sharing what they feel and it must be good work on part of CV to create such characters whoes action/inaction calls out different opinions for same action.
This is beauty of literature enjoy as much as you can.
There are writer I mean. Actual literary writers who have reworded the characterization Of Ram to make him villian and Ravan as righteous, same is true for mahabharata's character. So are these writers stupid or have malicious intention to ' gumrah' bholi janta against Ram or Krishna.
No, simple answer no. Then what?
To have their version means they knew and had internalized the character in their way and they share their thoughts they are out there in open for anyone to read - agree disagree with them. They do not write or internalize for readers. Readers do not read them to vote for or againt any version. Same is true for writers here!
Absolutely love your response, and usually after a while I just leave my posts alone, unless I find something that compels me to log in...and urs dragged me back.
Yes, I absolutely agree that every work of art, be it a sketch, or a painting, poetry or prose, movies, dramas, shows...any form of creativity is always open to different interpretations and also criticisms. Bouquets and brickbats are an intrinsic part of art and if you think that this post is about my grouse towards those who have different interpretations on this show than mine, you are sorely mistaken. Or rather I have not conveyed want I want to say clearly. I am a huge fan and a regular reader of certain writers, and they and me rarely share a thought š.
My point here, if complaints about a character not connecting are persistent and are constantly on the rise, it points to a glaring deficiency on the part of the cvs. Here the writers go so deep, they can actually make us see, what otherwise is not easily obvious. And that is dangerous cause the common man out there, just a simple viewer, watches this show for twenty minutes and retains what is shown, that's all. They don't visit IF, or read beautiful in depth, behind what is apparent analysis. Writers here are so powerful that they can make us think and rethink, but that does not help the show. Cause the simple viewer does not have the luxury or benefit of such analysis. With them, what you see is what you get. Neither do they think about leads and the hows and whys in depth or give them the time of the day. If the cvs do not get across, it only leads to disgruntled confusion. And so the cvs have to realize that they have to make sense to not so deep people like me, sans the help of such powerful pen wielders. And there are plenty like me in this forum alone, who are confused and baffled about a lead and related antics, so imagine what is going on outside this forum. I love the various interpretations, actually totally need them and rely on them to understand Paro, that surely is a credit to some writers but is definitely a shame on the part of the cvs. I feel something is seriously wrong with what we see, when we have to come back and read some and then get a clear picture.
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
Hindi TV Shows
