Please explain..... - Page 5

Originally posted by: surabi

Surabi u said it all,,, i said it before too,, That has paro reached a point where she would become totally IRREDEEMABLE??? ,, earlier there were complains that she was not behaving like a human, and now when she is showing some signs, then ppl are whining about INCONSISTENCIES,, Cant we just move with the flow,, what 's done is done,,,
As u put it, such kinda things just water down everything,,

Edited by soulspirit - 11 years ago

Originally posted by: surabi

Eve,

For once I liked the way paro reacted... To me she is not showing any fury... She is just avoiding him... she is not asking him anything at all... she is just keeping a distance... yeah- her face showed hurt when she saw laila with him- traces of jealousy... If she did not show that, I will agree with you that she is a mahan character... that was a humanly reaction..

I do not like the fact that she wants laila to stay there. Keeping that aside, the bigger question here is how laila's presence is going to affect her/their life? her question is correct- laila ke hone ya na hone se kya farq padtha hai?? I think for the first time she came out of her fairyland bubble... Now she realizes (that song and her cries after Rudra explains everything) the situation in its true sense.. That she is married to him but does not know her true meaning or place in his life... she is alluding to the fact that he has not given her any rights as a wife..

BUt here, she has not demanded any explanations or apology from him.. it is him who is going after her...

what do you want her to do- if she is mad at him for his affair, that would be not right since as she herself said "it happened before they even met "

if she act like nothing happened and back to her old self, that would make her character look very weak... that She has no earthly reactions at all.. then she would be like a superficial character...

My personal viewpoint-Under the situations, this was the perfect reaction... She is sad about the fact that there is a third person in their life and that she is not sure about her position in his life... How can she fight laila when she herself does not know what she is to rudra.. Apart from the fact that he shows that cannot stand to see her pain, he has not given any promise to her so far...

What complicates the whole scenario in my opinion is the fact that she is planning to leave him at some point..

For me I would have liked this paro right after their marriage instead of acting all lovey dovey after the eight phera marriage... silent but powerful...

Originally posted by: eveline

This post is about logical questions and their answers...not about my bias. And in order to comment onmy tendencies, you have to go through my body of writing about this show since day one, which is too much to ask for. Sorry, but your responses reek of personalities and being judgemental about me. And I hate a war of words about fictional characters. If you can logically explain the characters...great, if not why point fingers at me?? 😉

Originally posted by: eveline

FIrst her worry about Laila's life, who tried to kill her, by itself shows Mahanta. And when she an be protected by others, why in the world insist on her stay...against her husband's wishes?? That itself underlines her martyr image. Here she does not care about hers or hubby's feelings but about Laila's safety, her husband's ex lover and her possible murderer...if that's not self sacrificing devi act what is??

And she is keeping her distance..why?? To punish him?? To keep him on tenterhooks?? To make him run after her...just give me an explanation of her distance from him. She gives her explanation when Rudra forces her, tries to talk to her, to communicate. Logically, her silence means anger, sulkiness, anger, displeasure, or punishment...if not why the silent treatment. Frankly just think, when does a person act like that...

And she is misleading when she says Laila ke hone se koi farq nahin padta. Have you seen her, her face, her reactions...obviously she is extremely affected. Rudra is honest enough to admit that Laila's presene bothers him...and then she goes ahead and asks him why. For exactly the same reasons that she affects you Paro...the difference Rudra admits it, you won't.

And why demand or expect or try to get a clear picture of her rights when she knows how the marriage took place. She already knows Rudra's stand on this forced marriage, on her, on her rights. Now..she is thinking about this?? About her waking up, and getting out of the bubble...I desperately hope so...lt's high time she wakes up and smells the coffee

No, he has not made any promises. But why does that sadden her, why demand an explanation, wifely rights...when she already knows the bitter truth. She did force his hand, and now she is forcing it again...sigh...

Yes, totally illogical to show her losing sight of the fact that she plans to leave him, then why demand a wifely rights or to know her place in his life. The cvs portrayal of Paro leaves me totally furious, they sacrifice her all the time at the altar of story progression.

Originally posted by: surabi

I am sure you don't remember me (since IPK days). I always follow your post, like it, but very rarely respond. today i had a different viewpoint and I shared... thats all...

Originally posted by: surabi

No- I was not questioning Eve's or your POV. I was just sharing mine...

I agree with you wholeheartedly that paro's reactions after marriage was 😕... But we cannot let that weigh down our enjoyment of all the future episodes, can we??? Its best to just forget and think that she was too innocent or naive to understand the implications...

But when did she demand any wifely right???? she did not even ask him anything, did she? she just refused to play the part of a happy wife today- thats all... her question about their relationship status was in response to his question about her sadness... she said it is not laila that is bothering her but the uncertainty of her role in his life... fair enough??? To me that was more of a statement than a demand...

I am not saying that sharing your viewpoints is a crime... I was just contradicting your (or Eve's) viewpoint with an opposing view...

lets not fight over this, please... That was not my intention... Lets be civil and mature...🤗

Originally posted by: eveline

Oye...no fights here...ever 🤗...not worth it yaar!! And I understand your thinking, its logical...hope I make sense too. Its just that we are looking through the same window at different things...you might be looking at Paro's beauty and I am busy ogling a shirtless Rudy...nazar nazar ki baat hai...😆