Posted:
Originally posted by: Chandraketu
One day an old Braahman came there crying with the dead body of his son in his arms and said - "Kaal has taken my son untimely - only at the age of five years. I never tell lies, nor I trouble anybody, then why my son has died in his childhood? Hey Raajan, Is this the happiness in your kingdom? My son has died because of Raam's sin, there is no doubt about it. Now either make him alive, or I will leave my body here at your gate with my wife. And then you will be responsible for Brahm Hatyaa (killing of a Braahman). When any Raajaa does some kind of sin, then only the public dies untimely. It is only because of Raaja's sin that this boy has died. Because Raam became Raajaa of Ikshwaaku Vansh, that is why this kingdom is without its master." That Braahaman was defaming and blaming Raam for his son's death and crying continuously.
I did not understand one thing here...which kingdom lost its master bcoz Ram became Raja of Ikshwakuvansh? Also does it mention of any particular sin in this context that caused the untimely death of the young boy? How does Ram come to know that Shambuka is the reason for the calamity?
Sorry I did not even care to see if these questions are already answered in the previous pages. Am in a hangover😉, after coming back from the library......
Current Affairs
