Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 68

No idea.. Infact after their marriage there is absolutely no mention of the wives of Lakshmana Shatrughana and Bharat.

Neither in Valmiki Ramayana or Ramcharitmanas

Only detail mentioned is names of the two sons born to each

In Ramcharitmanas that mentions Jalsamadhi, the ministers and some Praja are seen joining them could be that wives joined too.

Some really interesting discussions going on here. I am enjoying reading them. Bring them more! 😊

However, I just saw holi special promo of Radha Krishna on twitter where they showed 8 Radhas and 1 Krishna playing holi. Some people started complaining that why aren't Krishna's wives shown in the promo 😂 (as if they matter to the makers 😅). Somebody came up with this weird theory to justify the promo that the 8 Radhas in the promo signify Krishna's Ashta bharyas. 😂😂😂😂😂 Also I saw a tweet there calling Radha the Queen of Dwaraka 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

Some really interesting discussions going on here. I am enjoying reading them. Bring them more! 😊

However, I just saw holi special promo of Radha Krishna on twitter where they showed 8 Radhas and 1 Krishna playing holi. Some people started complaining that why aren't Krishna's wives shown in the promo 😂 (as if they matter to the makers 😅). Somebody came up with this weird theory to justify the promo that the 8 Radhas in the promo signify Krishna's Ashta bharyas. 😂😂😂😂😂 Also I saw a tweet there calling Radha the Queen of Dwaraka 😂😂😂😂😂😂

50 years from now, there will be people insisting Radha was Krishna's chief wife, maybe only wife, and queen of Dwaraka.

A non-existent character!

The ones I feel bad for are Satyabhama, Jambavati, and Yamuna. Satya and Jambavati because they actually played important roles in the whole saga which are being erased or being manipulated into something else. Yamuna because an assault victim can't seem to get justice even in the modern era.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

50 years from now, there will be people insisting Radha was Krishna's chief wife, maybe only wife, and queen of Dwaraka.

A non-existent character!

The ones I feel bad for are Satyabhama, Jambavati, and Yamuna. Satya and Jambavati because they actually played important roles in the whole saga which are being erased or being manipulated into something else. Yamuna because an assault victim can't seem to get justice even in the modern era.

I just can't accept what they are showing in the serial. I liked Radha Krishna jodi till Krishna left for Mathura track. After that I just can't accept anything they are showing just to please those 12 year old nibbis who don't even contribute much to the trps. Whether Radha existed or not I don't know but I have always heard since my childhood that Radha Krishna love was the purest and selfless form of love. They stayed away from each other and never saw each others faces for years together yet they always loved each other. Someone in one of these threads had said that the beauty of Radha Krishna relationship was in their separation and not in those raas leelas and other stuff.

Krishna did love Radha but he loved his wives too. He never neglected them or took them for granted. This serial is literally making it look like Radha Krishna are indulging in an extra marital affair though without any physical intimacy and his wives were forced to accept this fact that Krishna will continue his affair with Radha no matter how many times he gets married and they will only be his namesake wives. The ones like Rukmini and Satyabhama who protested and demanded their rights were forced to change their opinions and Jambhavati who is the only wife who protested turned into a vamp. Yamuna's character too was butchered and in the end she too had to regret her decision of marrying Krishna.

I really wish they never bring Rukmini and Satyabhama back in the show because their characters would be butchered even more by the writers. This serial is literally polluting the minds of those teenage boys and girls and makes them believe through this serial ke Radha Krishna that marriage is just society ka bandhan and u can continue ur relationship with ur ex no matter what.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

50 years from now, there will be people insisting Radha was Krishna's chief wife, maybe only wife, and queen of Dwaraka.

A non-existent character!

The ones I feel bad for are Satyabhama, Jambavati, and Yamuna. Satya and Jambavati because they actually played important roles in the whole saga which are being erased or being manipulated into something else. Yamuna because an assault victim can't seem to get justice even in the modern era.

They even made Rukmini bad. And she has always been portrayed the best

To be honest I seriously feel that this show is promoting adultery. I know they aren't showing up to that limit, but obviously everything else like eye contacts and staying together forever with your gf/bf completely ignoring your spouses. Forget Ayan, wasn't Radha the mukhiya of Barsana? Didn't she have at least a responsibility towards that?

I mean why the hell are they stretching this show? Please stop and start a reincarnation thing with Kalki avtaar and his gf as a science fiction show

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

They even made Rukmini bad. And she has always been portrayed the best

I usually don't care about her because she has zero role in the plot. TBH, I think she's interopolation, too. Satyabhama and Jambavati are definitely not.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

To be honest I seriously feel that this show is promoting adultery. I know they aren't showing up to that limit, but obviously everything else like eye contacts and staying together forever with your gf/bf completely ignoring your spouses. Forget Ayan, wasn't Radha the mukhiya of Barsana? Didn't she have at least a responsibility towards that?

I mean why the hell are they stretching this show? Please stop and start a reincarnation thing with Kalki avtaar and his gf as a science fiction show

I told na, this show is promoting extra marital affair without physical intimacy. I think Radha is in Dwarka ever since she came to visit Krishna and Rukmini after they got newly married. They did show her couple of times wishing to return to Barsana but Krishna would stop her telling her to solve his wives problems, kids problems 😂 and Radha had to stay back. Imagine Krishna asking Radha to solve his personal problems. 😅

I was watching some old clips of Rukmini and they literally portrayed her as a bad person just because she was a devoted wife and expected him to love her the same way she does. And then there's a scene where Radha tells her that I will always remain the most important person in his life and u and other wives of Krishna should be his sakhis more than his wives and poor Rukmini had no choice but to accept it. They made her look bad just because she was jealous of Radha. Any wife will feel jealous if her husband still loves his ex gf and treats her only as a responsibility and nothing else.

Last week I saw this hilarious scene where Yamuna complains to Krishna that u and Radha got married and that's why she's living with u in Dwarka 😁 but why can't u meet me? To this, Krishna replies that marriage is just society ka bandhan and my relationship with Radha is above all these bandhan. But then this was the same Krishna who had given Radha the example of Ram and Sita to prove that their love was eternal. 😁 But then Ram and Sita were married couple not lovers so the comparison was so so wrong 😂

Thinking of Rukmini, I seriously want one scene between Charumati and Krishna when Krishna tells her that although he is marrying her to Kritvarma's son but the love of this son was always in love with the loyality to Kauravas hence she shouldn't expect love from him.

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

I told na, this show is promoting extra marital affair without physical intimacy. I think Radha is in Dwarka ever since she came to visit Krishna and Rukmini after they got newly married. They did show her couple of times wishing to return to Barsana but Krishna would stop her telling her to solve his wives problems, kids problems 😂 and Radha had to stay back. Imagine Krishna asking Radha to solve his personal problems. 😅

I was watching some old clips of Rukmini and they literally portrayed her as a bad person just because she was a devoted wife and expected him to love her the same way she does. And then there's a scene where Radha tells her that I will always remain the most important person in his life and u and other wives of Krishna should be his sakhis more than his wives and poor Rukmini had no choice but to accept it. They made her look bad just because she was jealous of Radha. Any wife will feel jealous if her husband still loves his ex gf and treats her only as a responsibility and nothing else.

Last week I saw this hilarious scene where Yamuna complains to Krishna that u and Radha got married and that's why she's living with u in Dwarka 😁 but why can't u meet me? To this, Krishna replies that marriage is just society ka bandhan and my relationship with Radha is above all these bandhan. But then this was the same Krishna who had given Radha the example of Ram and Sita to prove that their love was eternal. 😁 But then Ram and Sita were married couple not lovers so the comparison was so so wrong 😂

hahaha the writers dont know "logic" and have not at all done their proper research. Storm (alias name) did mention that their beauty was in their separation yet intertwined with each other. These people should have shown that. Should have shown how Radha managed Barsana and Vrindavan after Krishna left, she was the Queen of both these lands and till date you do feel this when you step into Vrindavan or Barsana. But na, these so called s****** writers have completely spoiled everything!! I pity all those people who think what they are showing is indeed the truth. If it matters, they will have a rude wakeup if they read the scriptures.