Call Me Old Fashioned But.. - Page 8

Created

Last reply

Replies

121

Views

8.4k

Users

33

Likes

236

Frequent Posters

amail1601 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#71

Originally posted by: shivani003

Lol u do dring up some interesting theories.😆 Maybe these rules were created to reduce adultery...I wouldnt be suprised!!!
I mean suppose u give the moralistic arguments to someone whose an aethist or someone who does believe the premarital sex is not a biggie, then they will probably roll their eyes or something or maybe think think ur bonkers. And if u give it being a norm argument to someone who is very religious and believes in their honour n culture etc then they will probably wanna clobber u with a sledgehammer!!! Its such a catch 22 situation😆
At the end of the day, it comes down to your upbringing/cullture/personal beliefs cos its ur body....

Lol...that's what happens when you live in a place that's modern but at the centre of an area of great historical/mythological importance. 😆 I grew up hearing my grandmom's stories about Hindu mythology, and my mom's explanations, and did a lot of reading on my own, so I do have a fair idea about this mythology/religion/culture stuff. 😉
And the best co-incidence is that yesterday I was watching an old movie that talked of Darwin's Theory of Evolution versus the theory of Genesis - from their arguments (the story was that a teacher was on trial for teaching Darwin's theory to his students in the early 20th century, which was considered blasphemous at the time), you could really understand how people created and use religion to explain the inexplicable, and how deeply entrenched religion is in their minds that they do not accept any deviations from it.
And as far as social customs and rules go, I've read about it in history - how a particular rule was made up to prevent some kind of a social evil, and how it got twisted into an evil itself. like dowry used to be a gift to the newlywed girl - a blessing of sorts - but it turned into an excuse for greedy in-laws to demand more money.
^^^now I'm sounding like a nerd. 😆
The situation you described is completely apt!! guess that's one reason why people have started avoiding these issues only. 😆😆
amail1601 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#72

Originally posted by: ka7eela


@blue i feel the same way!

@bold 🤣 so true thats why i don't mind watching a simple lip lock then the stuff they show, seriously the things they show in the Indian series are far more intimate then a simple lip lock, all that rubbing , tight hugging and kissing and touching some odd places like tummy, and whatever ( btw this reminds me of Rids from DMG)😆
erm, at the risk of being killed by DMGians, I was referring to her in part (but that's only coz DMG is the only show I had been watching before PKYEK). 😆
@thats why i loved it too😳

@ green exactly , we dont want lame justifications!, at least they should show us that they were married in secret!😉
even if they don't....they just shouldn't make up excuses or denials, like in my Univ exams I have to not mention that the poem I'm studying is not about seduction when it is. it's super-annoying! Ouch

SStephy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#73

Originally posted by: ka7eela


Yesterday when they showed the intimate scene between Abhay and Maithli, i loved the subtle passion they have projected, but the first thing that crossed in my mind was, i hope they were married!

I don't believe in living in relationships, i truly believe this whole pre-martial affairs or getting physical before getting married, taints true love!, it damages it!, and its totally wrong!

When a boy truly loves a girl he should respect her and not get into the bed with her without marriage, otherwise whats the difference between us and animals who mate with whomever they fancy!

I hate it, when things like this get promoted in media in the name of love!

Call me old fashioned but i am not trying to attack anyone who think otherwise, this is my personal BOV!

@ Underline: I wouldn't want to comment on this since its a topic with varied opinions. So the best policy to follow would be - to each, their own...
@black: Well said...👍🏼
True love should have the patience to wait for marriage and it is this patience that makes us human.
@red: couldn't agree with you more. It is more apalling to see such situations n scenes in any story to be justified as true love. Such ideas can have a negative influence on young minds and de-stabilise their morals.
Posted: 14 years ago
#74
Kaheela,
Okay, coming from personal experience I totally agree with your post about the media projecting certain things especially to the youth and making it seem like its totally okay without showing the "hard" reality of consequences. I remember, one one of my cuzin's daughter who is only 12 years old after watching the movie Hum Tum stated that Saif Ali Khan didn't realize he loved Rani Mukherji until after they slept together in the movie. So, she was like "is that thing they do what love is? so my mommy and daddy say they love each other they probably do that too!"
You can imagine the terror look on my face! I was horrified. This is one example where I know how media can get to the mind of the youth especially those who haven't experienced life enough or its realities and television is their only mode to life.
Second of all, I personally don't believe in premartial sex either. I was raised in the U.S. and I've lived in London too so, like so many youngsters here I know how the culture here is like. But, I don't think that where you live should define what your personal values and morals are. Just because you live in an environment/culture that promotes premartial sex, or live-in relationships doesn't mean you need to think its okay. I don't believe the environment, the media, or your friends should define your moral values because that just means that you aren't strong enough to stand on your own principles.
Also, another point I want to make is that I don't believe lust and love are the same thing and I don't believe that getting all-the way physical with someone before marriage means you love them. Love is an entirely different concept than lust. Love has more depth to it then just physicality, it deals with how much emotionally involved you are with someone, how well you understand and respect each other. Sex doesn't define love. Becuz, sex also happens among animals, among people who favor one-night stands, prostitutes, etc. etc. So, all these people define love?? Lust, is when you want to get physical with someone and you lust for their body becuz, how they look but, not from who they are in the inside.
I do agree that attraction is the initial stage of love but, still it is not what defines love. You can be attracted to someone but, still not be in love with them. There good-looking people you might come across that you get attracted to and yet you don't even know them. For this reason, I don't believe in love at first sight, I can't imagine just looking at a guy in the first meeting and fall in love with him! I mean I need to be able to know him how he is personally, what his beliefs are, what his personality is like. What if he is the most cutest guy ever and yet inside he may be a abusive jerk who wants to just sleep around with women?
Love is something far more deep. I knew a British married couple (in their thirties) in London where a wife got in an accident which damaged certain parts in her body and due to her medical condition she found it hard to get physical with her husband......I am not going to get into too many details but, lets just say that their physical married life suffered. They had their share of troubles and it was to that stage where the husband eventually wanted to get out of the relationship and he was dating another woman. They did separate for some time and somewhere down the road he realized that he could never find that same understanding from another woman like he did with his wife, he couldn't never find that emotional satisfaction or love for another woman as he had with his wife. So, they eventually got back together and its been like 13 years and they are still together. I remember her telling me that though they don't have a great sexual life like other normal couples but, yet they are happy as they find other things to cherish with one another like playing board games, cuddling up and watching movies, debating about things, playing sports, going out. Cuz, if you love someone then the only thing that matters is that you are with each other, how well you understand each other and nothing else.
I still look to them as inspiration though I know their marriage hasn't been perfect but, yet the way they are so happy and how it was their love for each other that their relationship was able to survive. Their example shows me that love is something beyond just what is sexual. Having said this, I think that when you get physical with someone, you give a part of your soul and dignity to that person. So, if you truly respect each other and love each other truly you two should have the capability to wait until you are in a acknowleged sacred bond like marriage. If you claim to love someone but, yet can't wait to get in bed with them before marriage then I guess your relationship has more emphasis on the physical element. If you think that without getting in bed with someone you can't have a relationship then you need to redefine what love/relationship means to you.
Such is in the case of couples who have a lifelong happy marriages and others whose marriage fails to survive even a few years. In the case of these couples, its how much they understand each other throughout the years even when they're old, their love still has that spark that many youngsters of today fail to have. Have you noticed that in the earlier generations, marriages were more successful and I've seen many elderly people more passionately in love with their spouse even after all these years. And today's generations consists of too much breakups, divorce rates going up, abortions, in the midst of all that striving culture of premarital sex, live-in relationships. etc.
Once again, I want to say Kaheela, Great post! I love your honesty and how you have the integrity to stand up for your principles. And NO! You are not old-fashioned at all. And becuz of this, my respect for you has increased immensely.
Edited by lighteningbuzz - 14 years ago
Div_Ridz thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#75

Originally posted by: lighteningbuzz

Kaheela,

Okay, coming from personal experience I totally agree with your post about the media projecting certain things especially to the youth and making it seem like its totally okay without showing the "hard" reality of consequences. I remember, one one of my cuzin's daughter who is only 12 years old after watching the movie Hum Tum stated that Saif Ali Khan didn't realize he loved Rani Mukherji until after they slept together in the movie. So, she was like "is that thing they do what love is? so my mommy and daddy say they love each other they probably do that too!"
You can imagine the terror look on my face! I was horrified. This is one example where I know how media can get to the mind of the youth especially those who haven't experienced life enough or its realities and television is their only mode to life.
Second of all, I personally don't believe in premartial sex either. I was raised in the U.S. and I've lived in London too so, like so many youngsters here I know how the culture here is like. But, I don't think that where you live should define what your personal values and morals are. Just because you live in an environment/culture that promotes premartial sex, or live-in relationships doesn't mean you need to think its okay. I don't believe the environment, the media, or your friends should define your moral values because that just means that you aren't strong enough to stand on your own principles.
Also, another point I want to make is that I don't believe lust and love are the same thing and I don't believe that getting all-the way physical with someone before marriage means you love them. Love is an entirely different concept than lust. Love has more depth to it then just physicality, it deals with how much emotionally involved you are with someone, how well you understand and respect each other. Sex doesn't define love. Becuz, sex also happens among animals, among people who favor one-night stands, prostitutes, etc. etc. So, all these people define love?? Lust, is when you want to get physical with someone and you lust for their body becuz, how they look but, not from who they are in the inside.
I do agree that attraction is the initial stage of love but, still it is not what defines love. You can be attracted to someone but, still not be in love with them. There good-looking people you might come across that you get attracted to and yet you don't even know them. For this reason, I don't believe in love at first sight, I can't imagine just looking at a guy in the first meeting and fall in love with him! I mean I need to be able to know him how he is personally, what his beliefs are, what his personality is like. What if he is the most cutest guy ever and yet inside he may be a abusive jerk who wants to just sleep around with women?
Love is something far more deep. I knew a British married couple (in their thirties) in London where a wife got in an accident which damaged certain parts in her body and due to her medical condition she found it hard to get physical with her husband......I am not going to get into too many details but, lets just say that their physical married life suffered. They had their share of troubles and it was to that stage where the husband eventually wanted to get out of the relationship and he was dating another woman. They did separate for some time and somewhere down the road he realized that he could never find that same understanding from another woman like he did with his wife, he couldn't never find that emotional satisfaction or love for another woman as he had with his wife. So, they eventually got back together and its been like 13 years and they are still together. I remember her telling me that though they don't have a great sexual life like other normal couples but, yet they are happy as they find other things to cherish with one another like playing board games, cuddling up and watching movies, debating about things, playing sports, going out. Cuz, if you love someone then the only thing that matters is that you are with each other, how well you understand each other and nothing else.
I still look to them as inspiration though I know their marriage hasn't been perfect but, yet the way they are so happy and how it was their love for each other that their relationship was able to survive. Their example shows me that love is something beyond just what is sexual. Having said this, I think that when you get physical with someone, you give a part of your soul and dignity to that person. So, if you truly respect each other and love each other truly you two should have the capability to wait until you are in a acknowleged sacred bond like marriage. If you claim to love someone but, yet can't wait to get in bed with them before marriage then I guess your relationship has more emphasis on the physical element. If you think that without getting in bed with someone you can't have a relationship then you need to redefine what love/relationship means to you.
Such is in the case of couples who have a lifelong happy marriages and others whose marriage fails to survive even a few years. In the case of these couples, its how much they understand each other throughout the years even when they're old, their love still has that spark that many youngsters of today fail to have. Have you noticed that in the earlier generations, marriages were more successful and I've seen many elderly people more passionately in love with their spouse even after all these years. And today's generations consists of too much breakups, divorce rates going up, abortions, in the midst of all that striving culture of premarital sex, live-in relationships. etc.
Once again, I want to say Kaheela, Great post! I love your honesty and how you have the integrity to stand up for your principles. And NO! You are not old-fashioned at all. And becuz of this, my respect for you has increased immensely.

Amazing said!
I Loved the way you explain things! Thanks for sharing your thoughs. S
ka7eela thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#76
👏

Originally posted by: lighteningbuzz

Kaheela,

Okay, coming from personal experience I totally agree with your post about the media projecting certain things especially to the youth and making it seem like its totally okay without showing the "hard" reality of consequences. I remember, one one of my cuzin's daughter who is only 12 years old after watching the movie Hum Tum stated that Saif Ali Khan didn't realize he loved Rani Mukherji until after they slept together in the movie. So, she was like "is that thing they do what love is? so my mommy and daddy say they love each other they probably do that too!"
You can imagine the terror look on my face! I was horrified. This is one example where I know how media can get to the mind of the youth especially those who haven't experienced life enough or its realities and television is their only mode to life.
Second of all, I personally don't believe in premartial sex either. I was raised in the U.S. and I've lived in London too so, like so many youngsters here I know how the culture here is like. But, I don't think that where you live should define what your personal values and morals are. Just because you live in an environment/culture that promotes premartial sex, or live-in relationships doesn't mean you need to think its okay. I don't believe the environment, the media, or your friends should define your moral values because that just means that you aren't strong enough to stand on your own principles.
Also, another point I want to make is that I don't believe lust and love are the same thing and I don't believe that getting all-the way physical with someone before marriage means you love them. Love is an entirely different concept than lust. Love has more depth to it then just physicality, it deals with how much emotionally involved you are with someone, how well you understand and respect each other. Sex doesn't define love. Becuz, sex also happens among animals, among people who favor one-night stands, prostitutes, etc. etc. So, all these people define love?? Lust, is when you want to get physical with someone and you lust for their body becuz, how they look but, not from who they are in the inside.
I do agree that attraction is the initial stage of love but, still it is not what defines love. You can be attracted to someone but, still not be in love with them. There good-looking people you might come across that you get attracted to and yet you don't even know them. For this reason, I don't believe in love at first sight, I can't imagine just looking at a guy in the first meeting and fall in love with him! I mean I need to be able to know him how he is personally, what his beliefs are, what his personality is like. What if he is the most cutest guy ever and yet inside he may be a abusive jerk who wants to just sleep around with women?
Love is something far more deep. I knew a British married couple (in their thirties) in London where a wife got in an accident which damaged certain parts in her body and due to her medical condition she found it hard to get physical with her husband......I am not going to get into too many details but, lets just say that their physical married life suffered. They had their share of troubles and it was to that stage where the husband eventually wanted to get out of the relationship and he was dating another woman. They did separate for some time and somewhere down the road he realized that he could never find that same understanding from another woman like he did with his wife, he couldn't never find that emotional satisfaction or love for another woman as he had with his wife. So, they eventually got back together and its been like 13 years and they are still together. I remember her telling me that though they don't have a great sexual life like other normal couples but, yet they are happy as they find other things to cherish with one another like playing board games, cuddling up and watching movies, debating about things, playing sports, going out. Cuz, if you love someone then the only thing that matters is that you are with each other, how well you understand each other and nothing else.
I still look to them as inspiration though I know their marriage hasn't been perfect but, yet the way they are so happy and how it was their love for each other that their relationship was able to survive. Their example shows me that love is something beyond just what is sexual. Having said this, I think that when you get physical with someone, you give a part of your soul and dignity to that person. So, if you truly respect each other and love each other truly you two should have the capability to wait until you are in a acknowleged sacred bond like marriage. If you claim to love someone but, yet can't wait to get in bed with them before marriage then I guess your relationship has more emphasis on the physical element. If you think that without getting in bed with someone you can't have a relationship then you need to redefine what love/relationship means to you.
Such is in the case of couples who have a lifelong happy marriages and others whose marriage fails to survive even a few years. In the case of these couples, its how much they understand each other throughout the years even when they're old, their love still has that spark that many youngsters of today fail to have. Have you noticed that in the earlier generations, marriages were more successful and I've seen many elderly people more passionately in love with their spouse even after all these years. And today's generations consists of too much breakups, divorce rates going up, abortions, in the midst of all that striving culture of premarital sex, live-in relationships. etc.
Once again, I want to say Kaheela, Great post! I love your honesty and how you have the integrity to stand up for your principles. And NO! You are not old-fashioned at all. And becuz of this, my respect for you has increased immensely.


Payal , brilliantly said and you said it all sis👏, take a bow my friend👏👏👏..i totally agree with you, there is more to love then the physical attraction, its beyond that , its much more deeper, as attraction will fade away in time, and will fly away once what made you get attracted to a person changes! like he/she becomes more heavier or older or..etc..but true love will grow with time, when you love someone truly you will cherish the changes in him and embrace him no matter what

when you love someone truly, you care about him and about his well being, you try to be there for him, his happiness and sadness matters to you! and you try to understand him, and trust and respect him, life won't be all roses there will be misunderstandings, disputes and there will be heartaches from time to time, after all we are human only, so nothing is perfect, but still somehow people who are truly in love manage to face its ups and down and it makes their bond grow stronger..they manage to survive it all, because they do care for each other and have this need be with each other for the rest of their lives

@bold, wow!! she actually said that!!..well this is what happens when kids are exposed to twisted things glorified by media and projected in a beautiful way that makes it appealing to them although they are beyond their comprehends, i read once a shocking news about a 12 years old American boy who impregnated a 14 years girl!..and he become a dad at 13!

here comes to role of the parents to explain to their kids and to condemn such behaviors and talk about them as they are not acceptable and that not what they see is true, and in the end of the day it all comes down to ones upbringing, believes and culture!


i was really moved by the example you gave about that British couple! the man first backed off because he thought he cant live without having a normal sexual life but then he realized that she is more important , she matters to him more then his own normal desires and he embraced her , and i applaud him👏..there are not many like him in our world..

however, i believe that the physical attraction is very important in a relationship, and leading a healthy sexual life after marriage is equally important for a successful marriage, not only for starting a family and having kids, but also for fulfilling the basic human desires that everyone has for intimacy, its important for a marriage to survive especially for couples who are still young and have sexual drives, this is how we human were created and this is the reality.. however the degree of its importance differs from a married couple to another!

some times ago i heard a debate between my mom and aunties( btw i have allot of them mashaAllah😆) they were discussing about this same issue, like the British couple my mom said she read about a man who become disabled from waist and below in his honeymoon when he had an accident, but his wife stayed with him although he cant sleep with her, and they were in their twenties at the time, and after ten years or so, she got pregnant from him by following a very difficult medical procedure and finally she got seceded in having a test tube baby..

the debate was about was it right from the mans side to let his wife stay with him although he cant be a normal husband her?! there were some pro him and some against

don't get me wrong but i personally find that very selfish of him, she was in her twenties and living with him like they are brothers and sisters, while she acted in selfless manner!

same applies to the British couple that you have mentioned, don't get me wrong i am not being judgmental but i feel its very selfish from her side to accept to be with him knowing that she cant give him a family or fulfill his basic needs

i don't know what future brings, but if God forbid i was in a similar situations and if i cant give my husband what he needs, i will let him go i wont be selfish and stop him from living a normal life and starting a family, even if it will break my heart even if he was the love of my life, i will let him go cause i cant be selfish..

thanks sweet sis it was pleasure reading your reply and the respect is mutual 🤗




Edited by ka7eela - 14 years ago
amail1601 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#77
@lightningbuzz......very well said!! 👏😊

Originally posted by: ka7eela

Clap


Really agree with you on all points, but I'll disagree a bit too now. 😛
i was really moved by the example you gave about that British couple! the man first backed off because he thought he cant live without having a normal sexual life but then he realized that she is more important , she matters to him more then his own normal desires and he embraced her , and i applaud himClap..there are not many like him in our world..

however, i believe that the physical attraction is very important in a relationship, and leading a healthy sexual life after marriage is equally important for a successful marriage, not only for starting a family and having kids, but also for fulfilling the basic human desires that everyone has for intimacy, its important for a marriage to survive especially for couples who are still young and have sexual drives, this is how we human were created and this is the reality.. however the degree of its importance differs from a married couple to another!
^^^agree to both things....disagreement comes neeche. 😛
some times ago i heard a debate between my mom and aunties( btw i have allot of them mashaAllah😆) they were discussing about this same issue, like the British couple my mom said she read about a man who become disabled from waist and below in his honeymoon when he had an accident, but his wife stayed with him although he cant sleep with her, and they were in their twenties at the time, and after ten years or so, she got pregnant from him by following a very difficult medical procedure and finally she got seceded in having a test tube baby..

the debate was about was it right from the mans side to let his wife stay with him although he cant be a normal husband her?! there were some pro him and some against

don't get me wrong but i personally find that very selfish of him, she was in her twenties and living with him like they are brothers and sisters, while she acted in selfless manner!

same applies to the British couple that you have mentioned, don't get me wrong i am not being judgmental but i feel its very selfish from her side to accept to be with him knowing that she cant give him a family or fulfill his basic needs

i don't know what future brings, but if God forbid i was in a similar situations and if i cant give my husband what he needs, i will let him go i wont be selfish and stop him from living a normal life and starting a family, even if it will break my heart even if he was the love of my life, i will let him go cause i cant be selfish..

I feel that the partner always deserves to have a choice whether to stay or leave.
Personally, if my guy is in trouble or has some problem, I would like to stay with him and take care of him. I love him for the person he is, and his flaws don't matter to me except where they trouble him. Sure, a healthy sexual relationship is important in a marriage, but if I love him so much, I think I can do without it. I would want him to give me that choice. That's what the wedding vows are about in any culture - in sickness and in health, in joy or sadness...
And in the same way, I wouldn't cheat him of the choice. In the same situation maybe I won't be able to give him that part of the relationship, but everything else I know that only I can give him the way he would need (sounds arrogant, but that's how I love!😆).
Watching Dill Mill Gaye, I always sympathised with Riddhima, because I can understand how it feels not to be given the choice.
So, if a person has chosen to spend his/her entire life with another person, they SHOULD be given a say in whether they want to continue doing it or not. It is very selfless to tell them to leave, but they should have a choice. 😛
When a person is unwell or has lost something, they need the love and support of the people they care about. it's nothing selfish - it's just how human beings are made. In fact, that's how all livings beings are made - they all seek comfort from close ones, whether they are spouses, mother-children, or a wolf in a pack. So disagree on that point too. 😛😆

saraaa. thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#78
I couldn't agree with you anymore! You've spoken my mind....Which is why I was hoping for the same.
Again, there's just no respect between the relationship when they guy and girl enter the bedroom and that too, before marriage. I am hoping that Ekta clarifies that flashback. A lot of Star One shows tend to go the 'hot and happening' way of today because apparently the youth audience likes to see such romance.....🤢
Edited by KaShBaarish..xx - 14 years ago
ka7eela thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#79

Originally posted by: amail1601

@lightningbuzz......very well said!! 👏😊


@ bold hey amail..i know from where you coming from, it should be a choice! i agree and i see you have reversed the situation here, but you know what i think if it was the other way around i would behave exactly like you i mean i would stand by my man no matter what , if i love him!

but i think its easier to say it then to do it , unless you are in the same situation , i mean i love kids and i would love to have few so to be honest i dont know how will i react if i was in a similar situation! but i know this, if it's my fault and i am sick one then i will never be selfish i will let him go even if he insists that he wants to be with me!

@blue..i think Rids was given a choice too many times and every time she said she chooses Sid he was her aaj aur kal blah blah, so i dont know what you are talking about here😛, i hated her spineless two faced character, who acted like a victim all the time when she was the main culprit! and i never sympathized with her!

@brown, i agree we all are selfish to some degree, but to stop my spouse of having a family of his own or fulfilling his basic needs, just because i need him around to take care of me, is hight of selfishness i think, especially if we both are still young! so let's agree to disagree 😳


Edited by ka7eela - 14 years ago
ka7eela thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#80

Originally posted by: KaShBaarish..xx

I couldn't agree with you anymore! You've spoken my mind....Which is why I was hoping for the same.

Again, there's just no respect between the relationship when they guy and girl enter the bedroom and that too, before marriage. I am hoping that Ekta clarifies that flashback. A lot of Star One shows tend to go the 'hot and happening' way of today because apparently the youth audience likes to see such romance.....🤢


@bold totally agree
@blue i hope that too i hope they show them secretly married like Romeo and Juliet 😉
@brown, i have noticed that too, in the first season of DMG Muskan slept with Rahul, and i heard that Gunjan slept with Sami too in MJHT !🤢




Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".