PRECAP - Taking the bull by the horns !!Link Added - Page 10

Originally posted by: baba2babu

it will be possible only when amma gains something ...i mean...if she gets into the bedroom then may be pratigya will concentrate on ganga...but as far as krishna is concerned he is not somebody who takes up charges and conduct kbj replacing pbj...cv' s also might give a chance to krishna...lets wait and watch...only a new promo can take us out of confusion as to who is going to take in charge oe of "ban jaaye..."

Originally posted by: Pragati.T

Hope this fact will b accepted by everyone spe when P's is critized for being so idealistic, bz in reality a person is realistic atleast in somewhere.

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

[

Any one is FREE to criticize any one, be it the unrealistic or realistic character,or a behaviour that is unbelievable or over the top etc. that is the whole purpose of the debate and discussion.

Besides is there any fun in saying I I Sir to every post, whether you like it or not 😆

Originally posted by: ramanbabitha

She is also a mom to three grown up adults... n now , something like this happening to her is something not agreeable n these type of actions brings SS's respect/status down and laughable... so not SS...

Originally posted by: riyya6

Yes, i do agree why Pratigya havent voice her concern abt trading human for repayment of loan... This is a serious issue which is still happening... Really would like to see Pratigya n GANGA face to face... Mayb that time Pratigya will get the whole picture right...

😕

Originally posted by: Pragati.T

@BLUE- EXACTLY, but whenever a idealistic approach is put under question and becomes a topic of discussion , some insulting and quite rude comments are passed over members lyk ''krishna toh gavaar ladkioo ki pasand hota hai'' and more interesting thing here is that such comment is lyked by ppl...😕 But it's good that have not seen ny such insulting comment in recent past..😉😆

anywayzz this discussions has twisted n is not acccording to the topic of this theard, so lets end it here..😊

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

[

@BLUE- EXACTLY, but whenever a idealistic approach is put under question and becomes a topic of discussion , some insulting and quite rude comments are passed over members lyk ''krishna toh gavaar ladkioo ki pasand hota hai'' and more interesting thing here is that such comment is lyked by ppl...😕 But it's good that have not seen ny such insulting comment in recent past..😉😆

anywayzz this discussions has twisted n is not acccording to the topic of this theard, so lets end it here..😊

Originally posted by: kEEnkEEn

I hear you...and if Ganga was suffering an indignity and serving body and soul til death, I can understand your passion...but we are not there just yet...

I am with you all the way if this was happening or looked likelt to happen any time soon - but it doesnt to me.

Indignity to humans is a crime in any reasonable person's eyes Sathya - as well as you many of us would not tolerate it - however I dont see it happening as things stand currently

Your fears may well be justified in a bit - and then its appropriate to act. But youre jumping the gun here in my opinion in calling it human trafficking or slave trading just yet. I am on the the other hand waiting and watching before I make that call...

In my haste I used the wrong word - I meant to refer to forced marriages and not arranged where in the latter of course the individuals have a say.

Plenty of forced marriages continue to happen where the girl has no say and does all the things you mention above "serving body and soul till death .. sometimes in the field, in the house, sometimes assuaging the lust of the males of the house with no free will , no opinions , no financial independence.

Such girls will not necessarily have recourse to their families at all - indeed they may have been instrumental in making the marriage happen. However under the pretext of marriage, men are allowed to get away with these "indignities" and are not accused of human trafficking or slave labour...

I reckon P too doesnt see what you do yet - she is more concerned with preserving her established family member's rights as a wife and sees Ganga as a threat to thise rights...she doesnt see Ganga suffering or resisting in any way what is currently going on...

I'm pretty sure based on what we know about P and her confounding habit of not being able to resist a cause she would latch on to that immediately IF there was a need...

In my HO P ,too. doesnt see what you see...