ABHIR&KIARA 14.12
Akshaye Khanna totally overshadowed Ranveer on Dhurandhar!
DHOLI UTHANA 15.12
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 3rd T20I🏏
Green Flag ⛳ Armaan!
CID Episode 104 - 14th December
Am Glad Tulsi mentioned this
Dhurandhar emerges an All Time Blockbuster
Abhiara’s Marriage
Karan Nandini to join post leap?
Rob Reiner and his wife found dead
Dhurandhar Pt 2 teaser and spoilers thread
Dharundar reduced Tere Ishq Mein to ashes..should Kartik be worried?
Ranveers PRALAY to roll after Don 3
In a 2022 interview, Ranveer disagreed with 8 hour shifts
Originally posted by: Salutethearmy
Totally Agree.
She should have asked Shaheer to play Ashok since he has done such roles and he does have the aura of a King or Mata selected Adnan bcos history says Ashok wasn't good looking looking.
I dun think any kings would have been good looking 
. All are buddhos with a big tummy
Shaheer have soft and cute looks...I doubt if those cruelty and ruthless part thru his facial expressions would have come out well.I think RT would have been a good choice...saw some episodes of JA...and the ruthless and cruelty part was played well by him.Still I think a good director plays an important part in bringing up the nuances of acting in a actor...and Ravi sir was the best example. Ashok according to history might not be handsome but I find Adnan handsomeOriginally posted by: Salutethearmy
Totally Agree.
She should have asked Shaheer to play Ashok since he has done such roles and he does have the aura of a King or Mata selected Adnan bcos history says Ashok wasn't good looking looking.
After watching the whole show, till now, I can say what's wrong with it. It took me some time to get over the cringe moments but here they go:
1. Copying and referencing other shows or movies.
2. The hindi/Sanskrit feels more similar to modern-day hindi.
3. Director could have been more strict and demanding.
4. More training, workout and workshops for ML, instead of him reviving his previous show in certain scenes. Did the director/producer want to cash on that, the nostalgia? If yes, that's a minus point. Also, did I detect a bgm similar to KA there?? 🙄
5. The funny scenes feel forced.
6. The costumes.
Goes without saying regarding the accuracy of the show or should I point it out too?
The director, actor and also the audience have their own vision. But if the director is good, so does the actor perform well, if not, my heart can go on.
Originally posted by: Manny_123
I dun think any kings would have been good looking
Not everyone Chandragupta Maurya, Prithviraj Chauhan, Viramdeva, Vikramaditya are considered really handsome kings
Originally posted by: firewings_diya
who is playing devi?
I know her by face, not by name, sorry 😅. But she doesn't pair well with Adnan.🙄
i really was looking forward to this. I felt actors ko enough time nahi diya rangu ne inorder to fill his timeslot.Originally posted by: Yashikha16
After watching the whole show, till now, I can say what's wrong with it. It took me some time to get over the cringe moments but here they go:
1. Copying and referencing other shows or movies.
2. The hindi/Sanskrit feels more similar to modern-day hindi.
3. Director could have been more strict and demanding.
4. More training, workout and workshops for ML, instead of him reviving his previous show in certain scenes. Did the director/producer want to cash on that, the nostalgia? If yes, that's a minus point. Also, did I detect a bgm similar to KA there?? 🙄
5. The funny scenes feel forced.
6. The costumes.
Goes without saying regarding the accuracy of the show or should I point it out too?
The director, actor and also the audience have their own vision. But if the director is good, so does the actor perform well, if not, my heart can go on.
I actually thought ashoka will be a weekend show. Which would have given them enough time to retake and edit. Ab they will serve maggie noodles 😮💨
. She will do what she wants. If she wants edit the history, she will do that 
Anupamaa
