Originally posted by: tinoo
While I agree with the technical aspects of your arguments in terms of the differences between saanchi and Jagya's individual approaches to their engagement and forthcoming marriage...
I don't agree with the spirit of Jagya's intentions at all, and those intentions dont make him any more noble than saanchi nor any less crooked than saanchi.
Even if he was doing something for his family, he was still overlooking the commitment he needed to make for his future wife. The fact that he was doing it for his family does not give him license to make a girl unhappy.
When he chose gauri, he chose the girl over his family's happiness. fair enough he tried to rectify the mistake in the second round... and choose the family over the girl. But that doesn't mean he can swing the other end of the pendulum and make a girl unhappy.
He knew that he was not able to reciprocate saanchi's affections or her feelings so what sort of meaningless marriage would it be (for her) if he was "forcing himself for his family'.
He knew he couldn't stand her company for two minutes. He knew he didn't feel like kissing her even, let alone making love to her.
So at his age, knowing what he did about marriage et. al he has wronged saanchi.
The fact that he does it for his family's happiness does not absolve him of culpability.
He had to ensure that BOTH family and wife would be happy with his actions.
Doing something for his family at the expense of his wife's happiness does not make him more right than saanchi.