Truth about Sangram Singh

enigmatic_zephy thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-11-13/news/44028828_1_sangram-singh-bigg-boss-tv-channels
I don't know but even being a trashy newspaper , it can't lie at that scale..

point being,

sangram is indeed a wrestler..

and the amount of fakeness you guys have claimed..just be very sure you have air tight evidence..

else its slandering..and at a very high scale..

a blog has been posted on this...writer is anonymous..

if not proven, that blog writer is punishable by law!..and with right means, its a child's play to track it..if complaint is fined against that blog!

Created

Last reply

Replies

44

Views

5.8k

Users

14

Likes

67

Frequent Posters

.furrii. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
I don't know why but I still feel he is not lying or being fake...
Typing Sangram Singh and checking does not give much info, but typing Sanjit Kumar does...

empusa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
But WWP iis just a television wrestling show...so it is not enough to prove sangram's credibiltity..

it is like a body to promote wrestling...no where can be compared to other sports bodies
empusa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: Hello.1

I don't know why but I still feel he is not lying or being fake...

Typing Sangram Singh and checking does not give much info, but typing Sanjit Kumar does...



even sanjeet kumar does not yield much favorable results..
GamesOfLife thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
thanks for sharing :)
enigmatic_zephy thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: empusa

But WWP iis just a television wrestling show...so it is not enough to prove sangram's credibiltity..

it is like a body to promote wrestling...no where can be compared to other sports bodies


not comparing it to sports body but the point is..how many tv shows will lie about it?

I am not saying what you nguys posted is right or wrong..the only point is..make sure the evidence sticks..
kaushikbasu thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#7
I guess he should have told he is a show fighter/wrestler what is harm in that it is profession as well. Not sure if his current claims are true or false. He would have had many many more fans at least in this forum.
Gyani96 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8
The other day I read a post by Cruiser who wrote a whole list of Sangram achievements and proved how none of them were ever achieved. I believed Cruiser as I myself found many contradicting evidences regarding Sangram list of achievements. The top being his gold in Commonwealth wrestling in 2006. A quick look at wikipedia and official site of common wealth wrestling shows that it was held on 2005 and 2007 but not in 2006 (dunno why).

here in this report Sushil kumar and Yogeswar Dutt winner of silver and bronze medal respectively at the Olympics are supporting Sangram singh. They are of the same profession. If Sangram Singh was indeed fake, why would both this famous wrestlers support Sangram. I am really confused now. Dunno what to believe.


SoPunk thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: enigmatic_zephy

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-11-13/news/44028828_1_sangram-singh-bigg-boss-tv-channels

I don't know but even being a trashy newspaper , it can't lie at that scale..

point being,

sangram is indeed a wrestler..

and the amount of fakeness you guys have claimed..just be very sure you have air tight evidence..

else its slandering..and at a very high scale..

a blog has been posted on this...writer is anonymous..

if not proven, that blog writer is punishable by law!..and with right means, its a child's play to track it..if complaint is fined against that blog!


And it's a bigger offense, claiming all those if false?

Is there any air-tight evidence of his achievement? News papers can write anything and lesser the circulation, lesser the credibility. We know it.

Have you received any solid evidence to caution the people who are questioning the credibility of Sangram's achievements?

They do acknowledge him as a wrestler, but that's of entertainment kind and they have presented a lost of credible evidence. Please check cruiser's thread on that...
enigmatic_zephy thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: SoPunk


And it's a bigger offense, claiming all those if false?

Is there any air-tight evidence of his achievement? News papers can write anything and lesser the circulation, lesser the credibility. We know it.

Have you received any solid evidence to caution the people who are questioning the credibility of Sangram's achievements?

They do acknowledge him as a wrestler, but that's of entertainment kind and they have presented a lost of credible evidence. Please check cruiser's thread on that...


Are you saying TOI has less circulation?

Then you are gravely mistaken.

And slandering by definition means saying things that hurt someone's image in a negative manner..

therefore, unless you have airtight evidence don't claim such things...

that is my point!

your question on proving he is not fake is baseless...and out of context. slandering is about negatively hurting someone's image without evidence...

unless (by law) you are certain beyond doubt that a person has lied about certain things only then point fingers..
Edited by enigmatic_zephy - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".