So it has been a good year ? - Page 2

Originally posted by: MoStLyHaRmLeSs

i
t didnt recover its budget thats why

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

ohh, but then why ppl call it hit .. not recovering d budget means its not a hit.

Originally posted by: KARAN888

Because it was a hit😛

😆
115 cr is still a pretty big deal and that was in 2011
Maybe thats why

but Ra1 sets a benchmark for the lame scifi flicks, nd its unfortunate that if K3 fails, then it will be called a 2nd Ra1 .. lol

Originally posted by: MoStLyHaRmLeSs

😆
115 cr is still a pretty big deal and that was in 2011
Maybe thats why

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

but Ra1 sets a benchmark for the lame scifi flicks, nd its unfortunate that if K3 fails, then it will be called a 2nd Ra1 .. lol

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

but Ra1 sets a benchmark for the lame scifi flicks, nd its unfortunate that if K3 fails, then it will be called a 2nd Ra1 .. lol

Ra. One special effects were excellent by bolly standards
Its story was also alryt
The trouble was that it tried to be a holly slick flick and a masala at the same tym
So it ended up being bad
It wasnt as lame as people make it out to be
As for Krrish I trust Rakesh Roshan not to mess it up like that

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

no salman's ready, bodyguard did collect 100+, nd so did don2 i think.. so whats d big deal ?.

A flop film is always a flop, unless it recovers its cost..

@Harshu.Sundas
Only Aamir and Salman had crossed it at the time of Ra.One on tgeir stardom
Otherwise there was Only Flop devgan's G3 riding on Shetty
So SRK was third

pretty big deal
Even today sttars like Akki, Ranbir struggling to cross it consistently
Those below only dream of it
So 100 cr is a big deal and that too with a nonsense movie