arvifan1 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#1
I came across many posts which said that Arjun did not mourn fr his dead child and he is selfish and he thinks about only pari etc etc...
well i just wana say that it has not been proved yet that ovi was carrying Arjun's child...so plz dnt be judgemental
And abt pari he will obviously care fr her becoz pari is his and purvi's child...ofcourse pari is a small baby and being a father he will obviously care for her and think of her better...Hope arvi reunites soon and take care of pari together <3

Well its just my point of u...

Haters plz stay away frm this post...

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

4.1k

Users

16

Likes

97

Frequent Posters

arvifanalways thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
I agree, especially the part that Ovi possibly was not even carrying Arjun's child . No such thing was shown between them
shagufta2211 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: arvifanalways

I agree, especially the part that Ovi possibly was not even carrying Arjun's child . No such thing was shown between them

me tooo agree i have strong feeling ovi was not carrying arjun's child
Ruchikaarvilove thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#4
i AGREE if mothers are becoming so seflish that they cannot raise their child , then its the father only who have to take steps forward..
arvifanalways thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: shagufta2211

me tooo agree i have strong feeling ovi was not carrying arjun's child



I think the child was romil's and now they can show Ovi went back to Romil as he was her childhood friend too 😉
rayadallie thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: arvifanalways

I agree, especially the part that Ovi possibly was not even carrying Arjun's child . No such thing was shown between them

True, I have not seen one bit of romance between arovi like I have seen between arvi. The only closeness i see and can remember between arovi is when ARJUN kissed her after he found out about pari from the cd.

I think the CV's deliberately did this so that they can have some twist and turns down the line.
Edited by rayadallie - 12 years ago
nicegirl_good thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
If Ovi wasn't carrying his child , she wouldn't have the courage to taunt Arjun about cheating on her
She would never have the courage to call pari his illegitimate child
Neither is Arjun so broad minded to give his name to ovi's baby
He would use that as an excuse to walk out of the marriage
He wouldn't put so much effort for the baby
Neither would Ovi be annoyed if he was always so worried about the baby
We were not shown the consummation scene hence the doubt ?
We were not shown Purvi and Arjun's consummation scene too
That doesn't mean they didn't sleep together
And when Ovi thought it was her baby
She wouldn't have been so confident when Pari's DNA matched with Arjun
Lol
Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#8
Back to the same o same o
WGF who gives a fig abt whether stillborn was Arjun's or not, Ovi had a stilborn and she never got a chance to know anything abt the baby...The gender, to love, kiss, hold, mourn or say goodbye..
As a husband he should have felt sadness for the same baby they were expecting together...No where it showed that he was not the father..
But Oh well
To justify anything we keep the crusade going..
Edited by Dabulls23 - 12 years ago
pari87 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: ilovedhanjanird

If Ovi wasn't carrying his child , she wouldn't have the courage to taunt Arjun about cheating on her
She would never have the courage to call pari his illegitimate child
Neither is Arjun so broad minded to give his name to ovi's baby
He would use that as an excuse to walk out of the marriage
He wouldn't put so much effort for the baby
Neither would Ovi be annoyed if he was always so worried about the baby
We were not shown the consummation scene hence the doubt ?
We were not shown Purvi and Arjun's consummation scene too
That doesn't mean they didn't sleep together
And when Ovi thought it was her baby
She wouldn't have been so confident when Pari's DNA matched with Arjun
Lol


Waneeka, totally agree! What hopes this forum has is beyond me...They did NOT show purvi-arjun making love, did they? But the forum happily imagined it in their heads and khatam, Purvi's pari is arjun;s child...Purvi could have done it with ANYBODY and passed it off as Arjun's na?

When Arjun has not once said anything about Ovi's baby not being his, nor has Ovi, but the forum wants to IMAGINE that this was not their child...What BS ( bull shit for people who do not get acronyms)

What does it boil down to? Does it take away a woman's right to mourn her dead child? God, i hope kids grow up with more logic than this in the world


rayadallie thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: ilovedhanjanird

If Ovi wasn't carrying his child , she wouldn't have the courage to taunt Arjun about cheating on her
She would never have the courage to call pari his illegitimate child
Neither is Arjun so broad minded to give his name to ovi's baby
He would use that as an excuse to walk out of the marriage
He wouldn't put so much effort for the baby
Neither would Ovi be annoyed if he was always so worried about the baby
We were not shown the consummation scene hence the doubt ?
We were not shown Purvi and Arjun's consummation scene too
That doesn't mean they didn't sleep together
And when Ovi thought it was her baby
She wouldn't have been so confident when Pari's DNA matched with Arjun
Lol



Ovi has so much courage to do so much damage and she would not have the courage to taunt arjun.

If arjun is not aware that ovi has been with someone else he is most likely to believe that the child is his.

We did not see ovi/arjun consummation scene and there is doubt but we saw the lead up to purvi/arjun consummation which caused us to believe that they were intimate that night and the result is pari.

You have a point on the DNA. But lets wait and see as the CV only show us what they want to.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".