he he, durgey (to borrow from wiwy), me no khushi. not sweet, not thin, not funny. but that sorry thing and the bangle thing reminded me of things from our lives.you hit the nail... there's a lot of many people who have been in long relationships in this lovely story. and it's obviously taken cues from the writers' own experiences or what they've seen around them.so, things feel real.someone had a nani like that. she cannot be created from a brief.and la was there too.of course, huge bits of the ideal man and woman in the jodi's traits.i am grateful to ipk for bringing love centre stage. in a world going nuts about money and losing the meaning of this fantastic and imposible to fully comprehend experience (for that's what love is, at the very least), it's lovely to see two people go crazy just because.ipk makes each one of us buy into an idea that in real life we are letting go off every day... that you love someone, just because you love them. not because they are good and kind and sweet and do what you want, or believe in things that you believe in, but because it is something your heart and insides feel and you somehow go along with that even when conventional wisdom says not to. a bit extreme, my pov i know, but that too is in the nature of this thing called love. and from that perspective, his telling khushi she is the best person, tum jaisi achchi koi ho hi nahin sakti, in apology, did not seem that bad. i might be mad at khushi. he might be too... but it is not good enough reason not to love her or make her feel special and whole again. that is what he was doing. ok, rambling is a chronic ailment of mine.but in essence, nature of love. i love ipk's exploration of it.so they were doing it for trp or money or whatever but somehow their dil kept guiding even when dimaag collapsed.
comment:
p_commentcount