In pre historic times, Avinash had a sister, and she got a baby, and died. Her husband never appeared on the scene, perhaps he was working in Dubai. This lonesome boy was the heir apparent according to the grand father's will. Avinash wanted to get rid of the little boy. He was a master at conniving. There was no hint of him being married. It might have been kept as a link for further use. Later, there was a man called Pushkar, the son of the Old Nani, and he was a cheat and trickster. He disposed off the baby Yuvraj, son of Iccha, and Old Nani was having a hand in it. All this is forgiven and forgotten, and they found a new witch in the body of Gunwanti. When her time was over with her tricks, they wanted a new villain. They brought Akash, and to make him more villanous they brought some other acts as his mother, aunt and mama. They positioned them in far way Allahabad, amidst old mughal forts and deserted landscape. They thought it would bring wow wows from the audience seeing these ethereal surface of India and its cruel past. Why did they choose UP this time, is it because of its current history ? Stupid Kana found a pretty girl, and married. She was his Mama's daughter, and he did not know. From the present scenes, it looks she knew it well, but she was a super trickster, so always she had a long face and churlish mouth. She hid her identity till Vishnu came on the scene. The CVs have shown the public that she is the one who would tell her brother what goes on in the house, but they have shown the rest of the cast as dumb people, who can make money, but without using their brains. They have large palatial houses without sweating. All inherited stuff. So, according to the CVs, only thieves and crooks can survive in this country, and it is by looting the rich, and using religion to promote their cause. Do the CVs too think the same, that they can get ad income, by creating scenes like these ? Is it the policy of Colors, owned by Viacom, to fool Indians this way ? Is there a hidden agenda ?
Anupamaa
