Why are skeptics given better treatment than fans?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Not Given

@Chippeshwini

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#81

Originally posted by: wat_up

I know it exists but is extremely unhealthy word, good you recognize that. I do agree that Phans should be allowed to have their views as long as logical and not get replies tht they worship the actor or actresses ground. Tht ticks me a lot. Msybe as lady gaga said we should have a union lol

But, I agree you are not that obsessive as you have criticized your star, but I think it irritating when others do and tht with no validity, just to annoy some.

Please, do the honor of defining "logic" =) that is a MAJORLY objective word

And DG, honestly, you DO get respect 😊 Many forum-ers love you, and dote on your fanatic stuff that they find cute.

Some people get irritated by it, and you can't please everyone. So why complain about nature?

Some people think I'm too cold and dont have enough lurrveee for people I like, while others understand me enough.

you don't see me complaining about not being able to please everyone do you.

Also, I feel that it's just a matter of every individual's ability to take stuff with a pinch of salt. In order to live conflict-free around people with different opinions, you've got to swallow a lot of lumps and swim in a sea of salt lol.

You kinda missed my point earlier about the whole cynics vs fans thing... I'm a ""fan"" of people too, and when people diss people I like, or call me stuff like "bhakt" and shit like that, I ignore it lol. Because its in your hand as to what comments you're meant to give significance.

Edited by liverach - 13 years ago