Originally posted by: prankz
without hurting anyones sentiments i would like to just ask a question...what made certain entities godlike or god?? it was through their actions and deeds that they came to be revered as god...and why cant we accept that these very great entities that we worship today were many eons a ago humans who had done such great deeds for mankind that they became god. why is it so hard for us to accept human emotions in god?? if we believe that god created the universe...then we need to believe that these emotions and feelings of love was introduced to mankind by god himself...so whats so insulting or degrading if pure love is being depicted between shiv and sati...after watching the show atleast i believe that the very concept of love started with shiv and sati...again..this is entirely my opinion...n i dont wanna hurt anybody sentiments...
your presumption is not correct certain entities were identified with god rather than they became God
once the person gets identified with god, the humanistic emotions and the separate existence of that person cease, and since these god like entities are worshiped by millions of people their humanistic emotions and qualities cease to exist and people worship only divinity in them rather than human emotions. so when such people are being depicted , certain care is to be taken so that humanistic portrayal does not dominate the divinity aspect and their actions should suggest divinity rather than human emotions.
all of the forum members are mesmerized by mouni and mohit's action so that they ignore this aspect. there many unexplained points which underscore the divinity aspect of the characters
1) Sati is always crying, helpless, damsel in distress, does'nt know her destiny and even forgets her destiny even after being mentioned by markandeya and even after her pooja by brahma and vishnu . that does'nt make any sense in anyway. this is DKDM version
compare this with sati depicted in shiv puran or devi puran she was human there too but divinity dominated the human aspect
2) Mahadev emphatically says sati' s marriage with him is asambhav but he marries her, is this not undermining divinity of shiva. even an explanation is not given for this.
argument sati is human does not also stand as revati is happily married to chandra who is not human
3) Daksh in swayamvar scene even defies brahma that is even more ridiculous a mere human defying the creator and Vishnu gives him boon even after all this nautanki. so this definitely damages the credibility of show.
4) Lord Shiva whose darshan is itself durlabh even after thousands of years of penance will now become ghar jamai of daksh. does that make sense in anyway
5) when i last heard sati was still ayogya for shiv then why the marraige happened.
so the point is when too many illogicals creep up into the show that mars the credibility of the show, people who like sati and shiv romance may still like it but the point it will just another show
which will be soon forgotten if such things continue.
the starting of the show was promise us many more things but i am afraid to say from the start of jal samadhi track its slowly but steadily going downhill.
Anupamaa
