Did Sati Devi have a Swayamvar? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

33

Views

7.3k

Users

17

Likes

150

Frequent Posters

pooji2012 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: jwalamukhi


i think u read only shiv puran...thats why u r having doubts regarding siva-sati wedding...

the real story of shiva is still unknown...and infact he is the god ...the only god mentioned in ancient india...before aryans...

many have interpreted the story of shiva in their own ways...but none knew which is correct...

i really appreciate mahadev team for showing the story in a different way...

I totally agree with you 100% jwalamukhi
We are mere humans and nobody knows the entire truth.
Its only our Shivji and Shakthima who knows all!!!
So lets really thank the team for their hard work!!!!! and lets enjoy their novel approach to THE ROMANCE OF THIS UNIVERSE!!!
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12
This is not only Shivji's story, so depending only on Shiv Puran always will lead to confusion. This Swayamvar version is given in Devi puran with Dadhichi explaing to Daksh about greatness of lord Shiv when Daksh refuses to respect Shivji. On Brhmaji's convincing Daksh carried out the marriage rituals. Every Puran gives the story giving more importance to the concerned Deity whose Puran it is. So same story will have different vedrsions in different books. We only need to broaden our views to enjoy the show, best is watch it without any expectations. Sati's story is not yet over, it has many unknown aspects, it is good to know those unknown aspects through this show.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: jwalamukhi


i think u read only shiv puran...thats why u r having doubts regarding siva-sati wedding...

the real story of shiva is still unknown...and infact he is the god ...the only god mentioned in ancient india...before aryans...

many have interpreted the story of shiva in their own ways...but none knew which is correct...

i really appreciate mahadev team for showing the story in a different way...

What do you mean by only God mentioned before the aryans?Confused Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh have always been the divine trinity long before the Aryans.
And I never knew the story of Sati's Swayamvar, but if it's mentioned in Devi Bhagawatham, then I guess it did happen, because I follow Devi Bhagawatham also.
I hope the story of Devi Sati gets interesting from here...though some of the Shiv-Sati scenes were cute, some of them were too modern and depicted the God and Goddess as base humans, but now that Shiv and Sati are going to be married, I hope we will see some devotional Pati-Patni scenes between them.
jwalamukhi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

What do you mean by only God mentioned before the aryans?😕 Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh have always been the divine trinity long before the Aryans.
And I never knew the story of Sati's Swayamvar, but if it's mentioned in Devi Bhagawatham, then I guess it did happen, because I follow Devi Bhagawatham also.
I hope the story of Devi Sati gets interesting from here...though some of the Shiv-Sati scenes were cute, some of them were too modern and depicted the God and Goddess as base humans, but now that Shiv and Sati are going to be married, I hope we will see some devotional Pati-Patni scenes between them.


this is the show...based on sati's point of view...sati is a human...so they showed such emotions...

devotional pati-patni scenes?😕...ab yeh kya hey???

shiva was the only god ...in ancient india...the concept of divine trinity...came after the aryans...as per my knowledge...
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: jwalamukhi


this is the show...based on sati's point of view...sati is a human...so they showed such emotions...

devotional pati-patni scenes?😕...ab yeh kya hey???

shiva was the only god ...in ancient india...the concept of divine trinity...came after the aryans...as per my knowledge...

Saying Shiva is the only God or Vishnu is the only God is the school of though of Shaivism or Vaishnavishm respectively. I belong to the school of thought that the divine trinity are all equal and one. I don't distinguish between them or believe that one was greatest.
And Devi Sati was not just a human. She was an incarnation of the divine Goddess, so like Sita her thoughts, emotions, and actions too were pure. She was not a human like you or me...incarnations were never 100% human. They were born humans but had divine comportment.
Sometimes, I find Sati's behavior and emotions a bit too humanistic and annoying in this serial, like Lakshmi's were in BR Chopra's Vishnu Puraan. BRC showed her constantly worrying and complaining about the goings on in Earth, and I find Sati's behavior in this show similar. While incarnations were allowed to have a few human feelings, showing them as totally human is not something I like to see in a mythological show.
The best thing about DkDM in my opinion are the philosophical scenes between Mahadev and Nandishwar. I love those.😍 The CVs have really gotten the philosophy of Hindu mythology down pat, but there's definitely room for improvement in the way they show Shiv and Sati's romance IMO. I hope they handle Devi Parvathi better, if they do show her story.
jwalamukhi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

Saying Shiva is the only God or Vishnu is the only God is the school of though of Shaivism or Vaishnavishm respectively. I belong to the school of thought that the divine trinity are all equal and one. I don't distinguish between them or believe that one was greatest.
And Devi Sati was not just a human. She was an incarnation of the divine Goddess, so like Sita her thoughts, emotions, and actions too were pure. She was not a human like you or me...incarnations were never 100% human. They were born humans but had divine comportment.
Sometimes, I find Sati's behavior and emotions a bit too humanistic and annoying in this serial, like Lakshmi's were in BR Chopra's Vishnu Puraan. BRC showed her constantly worrying and complaining about the goings on in Earth, and I find Sati's behavior in this show similar. While incarnations were allowed to have a few human feelings, showing them as totally human is not something I like to see in a mythological show.
The best thing about DkDM in my opinion are the philosophical scenes between Mahadev and Nandishwar. I love those.😍 The CVs have really gotten the philosophy of Hindu mythology down pat, but there's definitely room for improvement in the way they show Shiv and Sati's romance IMO. I hope they handle Devi Parvathi better, if they do show her story.


i don't know why u bring every time BR chopras names while talking about the mythological shows...

do u really feel that chopras presented the same as what written in the puranas...

No...can i ask one question...

u read all the puranas in the sanskrit version..or telugu/ english...?
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#17
I don't bring BRC's name every time...it's that in this incidence, the characters of Lakshmi and Sati seem the same.
Anyway, I don't want to argue with you. People in this forum seem to be very defensive about Shiv and Sati's love story, they can't take any criticism, but not just me, a lot of my my friends are also not pleased with the way Sati is being portrayed, and this is not the first mythological show we have watched.
I have not read every purana there is out there, but I am not stupid either. I have heard the discourses of knowledged saints and read a good number of books too. I know how the personalities of Gods and Goddess must have been when they came to Earth, because we have a lot of sources to base them off of.
I'm not saying this serial is bad, but it's not perfect either. I really like the philosophical and religious teachings it shows, but I'm not enjoying the romance because it's not how the Shivji and Sati Devi I pray to everyday would behave. All I have to say is that if their romance was perfectly shown, the TRPs of this show would have been a lot higher.
I just wish Sati wasn't portrayed to be so human sometimes. It's not what majority of mythological viewers want to see, regardless of anyone else.
jwalamukhi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

I don't bring BRC's name every time...it's that in this incidence, the characters of Lakshmi and Sati seem the same.

Anyway, I don't want to argue with you. People in this forum seem to be very defensive about Shiv and Sati's love story, they can't take any criticism, but not just me, a lot of my my friends are also not pleased with the way Sati is being portrayed, and this is not the first mythological show we have watched.
I have not read every purana there is out there, but I am not stupid either. I have heard the discourses of knowledged saints and read a good number of books too. I know how the personalities of Gods and Goddess must have been when they came to Earth, because we have a lot of sources to base them off of.
I'm not saying this serial is bad, but it's not perfect either. I really like the philosophical and religious teachings it shows, but I'm not enjoying the romance because it's not how the Shivji and Sati Devi I pray to everyday would behave. All I have to say is that if their romance was perfectly shown, the TRPs of this show would have been a lot higher.
I just wish Sati wasn't portrayed to be so human sometimes. It's not what majority of mythological viewers want to see, regardless of anyone else.


it is not a mythological show ...the main plot of this story is...love story of shiv and sati...sati's emotions as human...for shiva...thats what creatives are trying to depict...

as u said ...the story of shiva his leelas...were presented a lot better in other shows too...but none has showed the love life of shiva...

DKDM...IS DOING THAT
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: jwalamukhi


it is not a mythological show ...the main plot of this story is...love story of shiv and sati...sati's emotions as human...for shiva...thats what creatives are trying to depict...

as u said ...the story of shiva his leelas...were presented a lot better in other shows too...but none has showed the love life of shiva...

DKDM...IS DOING THAT

It is a mythological show, because:
1) Shiva and Sati are Hindu Gods and any show that depicts their story, whether it be romance or other stories, is a mythological show. How can you say DkDM is not a mythological when even the CVs categorize it like that?
2) Non-mythological or non-historical shows are based off of fictional stories, and Shiva/Sati are not fictional characters. They are Gods everyone prays to.
Om Namah Shivay depicted the love story of Shivji and Devi Parvathi as well, and it showed it in an accurate, decent way without adding unnecessary fluff or making Parvathi seem human.
It's fine, I know many members in this forum are looking for a modernized version of Shiv-Sati story which includes passion and lots of romance like they find it Star Plus shows, even if that is not appropriate to show between Gods. If you guys are enjoying it, that's fine, but for viewers like me who want to enjoy the show for Lord Shiva's leelas, it's a bit difficult to digest such scenes because for me, it's an insult to depict Devi Sati in such a manner. I'm not trying to criticize the show for no reason. I love mythological shows and want to enjoy this show for romance too, not just for the philosophical lessons...but more olden-day romance that would be appropriate for the Satya Yuga in which this story happened. The romance scenes in this serial seem more like Kali Yuga romance.
I like the actors and the settings and the overall devotion of this serial. I think the CVs are doing a really good job in that, but the romance and depiction of Sati and even Shivji during the romance scenes needs lots and lots of improvement in order to attract other mythological fans. This isn't the only show to show romance in mythology. Other shows, like Ramayan, Jai Shri Krishna, Krishna Leela, and all of them showed Ram-Sita and Radha-Krishna romance in an appropriate manner. Even DBSK, which became a flop now, showed Rukmini-Krishna well in its initial episodes. No one else seems to have a problem depicting Gods' love stories, that I don't understand why the CVs are taking a humanistic directing in depicting Shiv-Sati romance. Even Ram-Sita, Radha-Krishna, Rukmini-Krishna, Krishna-Satyabhama, were all human avatars of Gods, but their romance is never depicted so humanistically.
Bhavaani thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
#20
😆 Lol let's not compare this to DBSK...that show is like a black spot on the name of Mythological shows. I don't think DKDM, even with its added masala is half as bad as that nonsense.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".