Poll

Do you think Sati has recognized Shiva in his human form?

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

1.1k

Users

5

Likes

22

Frequent Posters

Sweet24 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: mnx12

Sati didn't burry herself, neither did she destroyed the yagya, that was done by Veerbhadra & his ganas.

Sati gave up her life by creating Yogagni fro her right thumb. Get your facts correct.


Well according to hindu myths, a yagya cannot have any non-veg content, sati jump into the yagya,
Veerbhradra was created to kill the daksh .
in the 108 names, she called sati, dakshkanya, dakshyagyavinashini.
Where have I mentioned about non-veg content?
Dakshyagyavinashini, means she was responsible for destroying Daksh's yagya.
You are following only 1 script & calling other's version wrong.
Goddess doesn't only have 108 names, the names you had quoted earier had many incompelete meanings, giving wrong interpretation. She has many Sahastranaams too. Shakti tatva is wast can not be limited to only 108 names. Refer to other scripts also to get better knowledge.

excuse me, why are u so getting hyper, u r taking in a negative way. Why do u think that u are the only person who knows everything. U can also make mistakes in it.

Everybody have there own opinion

I am trying to say that a yagya cannot contain any non-veg content, like we put ghee into it, so if any non-veg content put into it the yagya becomes useless.
like we have seen that, to stop the yagya the asur/devils used to do the same thing.

sati yagya me hi kud gayi thi, ussne ussi me apni aahuti de di thi. ye chiz mene bahut si jagah padi hai.

rahi baat dugaji ki 108 naam wali baat to mujhe bhi malum hai ki unke kai naam hai,
ye jo 108 ka mene mention kiya hai, ye durga saptshati ke paath me durgaashtatrastortra me likhe gaye hai, jinhe shivji ne khud bataya hai.

According to sati khand, When Sati reached there, she was not given respect by her father Daksha. Not only this, Daksha made fun of Rudra. Feeling dishonored, Sati gave up her life by jumping into the sacrificial fire."

Edited by Sweet24 - 13 years ago
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12
Where have I mentioned about non-veg content?
Dakshyagyavinashini, means she was responsible for destroying Daksh's yagya.
You are following only 1 script & calling other's version wrong.
Goddess doesn't only have 108 names, the names you had quoted earier had many incompelete meanings, giving wrong interpretation. She has many Sahastranaams too. Shakti tatva is wast can not be limited to only 108 names. Refer to other scripts also to get better knowledge.

excuse me, why are u so getting hyper, u r taking in a negative way. Why do u think that u are the only person who knows everything. U can also make mistakes in it.

Everybody have there own opinion

I am trying to say that a yagya cannot contain any non-veg content, like we put ghee into it, so if any non-veg content put into it the yagya becomes useless.
like we have seen that, to stop the yagya the asur/devils used to do the same thing.

sati yagya me hi kud gayi thi, ussne ussi me apni aahuti de di thi. ye chiz mene bahut si jagah padi hai.

rahi baat dugaji ki 108 naam wali baat to mujhe bhi malum hai ki unke kai naam hai,
ye jo 108 ka mene mention kiya hai, ye durga saptshati ke paath me durgaashtatrastortra me likhe gaye hai, jinhe shivji ne khud bataya hai.

According to sati khand, When Sati reached there, she was not given respect by her father Daksha. Not only this, Daksha made fun of Rudra. Feeling dishonored, Sati gave up her life by jumping into the sacrificial fire."

So this is the way to reply to someone posting comments on your post?
I have never claimed I have much knowledge, a normal mistake pinpointing can never be called taking things in -ve way. regarding non-veg content it is not at all part of this topic, so what was the need of mentioning, I feel pained seeing such interpretations may be that's my fault.
Please clear my doubt are you calling Yogagni non-veg content, because mention of non-veg was made only after that.
Edited by mnx12 - 13 years ago
Sweet24 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: mnx12

Where have I mentioned about non-veg content?

Dakshyagyavinashini, means she was responsible for destroying Daksh's yagya.
You are following only 1 script & calling other's version wrong.
Goddess doesn't only have 108 names, the names you had quoted earier had many incompelete meanings, giving wrong interpretation. She has many Sahastranaams too. Shakti tatva is wast can not be limited to only 108 names. Refer to other scripts also to get better knowledge.


excuse me, why are u so getting hyper, u r taking in a negative way. Why do u think that u are the only person who knows everything. U can also make mistakes in it.

Everybody have there own opinion

I am trying to say that a yagya cannot contain any non-veg content, like we put ghee into it, so if any non-veg content put into it the yagya becomes useless.
like we have seen that, to stop the yagya the asur/devils used to do the same thing.

sati yagya me hi kud gayi thi, ussne ussi me apni aahuti de di thi. ye chiz mene bahut si jagah padi hai.

rahi baat dugaji ki 108 naam wali baat to mujhe bhi malum hai ki unke kai naam hai,
ye jo 108 ka mene mention kiya hai, ye durga saptshati ke paath me durgaashtatrastortra me likhe gaye hai, jinhe shivji ne khud bataya hai.

According to sati khand, When Sati reached there, she was not given respect by her father Daksha. Not only this, Daksha made fun of Rudra. Feeling dishonored, Sati gave up her life by jumping into the sacrificial fire."

So this is the way to reply to someone posting comments on your post?
I have never claimed I have much knowledge, a normal mistake pinpointing can never be called taking things in -ve way. regarding non-veg content it is not at all part of this topic, so what was the need of mentioning, I feel pained seeing such interpretations may be that's my fault.
Please clear my doubt are you calling Yogagni non-veg content, because mention of non-veg was made only after that.

tum abhi bhi samaj nahi paa rahi ki me kya kehna chahti hu?

non-veg content: mene ye nahi kaha ki tumne kuch non-veg kaha hai.
me yagya ki baat ker rahi hu, yadi yagya me koi non-veg chiz gir gaaye jaise koi haadi , ya koi mass. to wo yagya ashudh ho jata hai. or us yagya ka fhal nahi milta hai.

Sati ne khud hi us yagya me apni aahuti de di thi. ab samji me kya kehna chahti hu?

mene jab devi ke naam post kiye the, tab tumne ussme khot nikali thi,thik hai koi baat nahi
per ussme kai naamo ke meaning sahi hai. kyuki durgasaptshati me iske kai meaning samjaye gaye hai.

jaise unke kai complexition hai like mahagauri ka white, mahakali ka black,etc etc
tab tumhe hi mujhse kaha tha ki:-" info dekhker post kiya karo, me bahut waqt se uske naamo ka adhyan ker rahi hu. or aise post mat kiya karo, it hurts."

per issme tum bhi galat ho sakti ho, dr.

I don't want to fight with u, but ur misunderstanding me.

Edited by Sweet24 - 13 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".