A not-so-bad episode IMO !! I dont know if there were some editing problem, or i had a short term memory loss or i might have missed something in between cos i was completely unaware of what kind of "chori" Yuvi and Suhana did . Right after the ad break, Abhijeet, ACp, Viivek all talking about some serious "chori" was out of nowhere for me đ˛ Did anyone notice that or it was me who missed some previous scenes !!?
Rest of the case was interesting, and made some sort of sense !! The motive was ...umm... okay-ish !! ACP sir connecting the two cases all of a sudden was wierd and stupid. He shouldnt have shown the photo of "Shruti" at the college in his first scene, cos it was in the next scene that they come to know at the lab about the inter relation between the 3 murders!
Also, in the scene, where Viivek shows them the photo of Yuvi and Suhana with the dead body, its Abhijeet who reminds ACP of the college, although we have never seen him visiting the college. Rather it was ACP himself !! Ajeeb hai bhai!đ
Now coming to the wardrobes... Daya sir looking extremely dashingđł, but it seems very informal at work !! NOM . Even collar t-shirts would be better i guess. Abhijeet sir đ... i just hope he doesnt keep repeating the coat with different shirts... or even if he does, please keep the combinations right!! Please!! I like the new shirts, i have always preferred plain shirt than striped. Hope the colours are a little more varied and a little brighter! đ ACP sir's combinations are bright and seem perfect đđź Freddy sir maintains the same style, but thanks for the new wardrobe anyways đ Kaajal is looking better, a change from PINK!đ Viivek looking extremely handsome... very bright colours!!! đł Salunke sir looking good too... No comments about Tarika đ.I still wish the docs could get an apron !! That would have looked more natural and formal !! Tarika's accessories are not very apt i feel...
Phew !! Done with wardrobe discussions đ So, overall, a not so happening, but still not a bad episode. a 2.5 from me !! Would have given a 3 if i wasnt so confused about the case đ
350