Kangna Ranaut to play super woman in Krrish sequel

The sequel to India's first superhero film Krrish has been talked about ever since it was announced. While Hrithik Roshan, Priyanka Chopra and Vivek Oberoi have been confirmed for the film, there have been a lot of names doing the rounds for the role of the negative female lead. In the recent past, actresses like Chitrangda Singh and Jacqueline Fernandez were considered for the role, however, things didn't quite work out. Now Bollywood Hungama has learnt that Kangna Ranaut has been finalized to play the part.

Kangna was initially supposed to play the role, but due to prior commitments, the actress declined the offer. But with Kangna's shooting dates for Dedh Ishqiya being pushed, the actress has agreed to become the first ever Indian sci- fi super woman.

Sources close to the actress confirm saying, "Yes, Kangna was initially approached to play the role, however there were date issues and she had to decline the film. Post that there were a lot of changes that happened with the films she is doing and with the dates of Krrish sequel as well. Hence, Kangna has now said yes to the film." http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/2011/11/01/16578/index.html

so all those visits to Senior Roshan's farmhouse for private 'script reading' sessions helped. 😉

how can she be a superwoman if she is playing a negative role...stupid journalists never make sense😵

EmmaFrost and what is the problem for anegative role to have asuper power ???

oh no! But better her than priyanka I guess.

Priyanka cnt play superwoman only !!😆

Originally posted by: theprince

EmmaFrost and what is the problem for anegative role to have asuper power ???

Originally posted by: EmmaFrost

no problem but i haven't heard negative people being called 'super' or otherwise...why would superman be called superman then...😆

There is Super-Skrull (a Marvel Comics supervillain) and Superboy-Prime (a DC Comics supervillain, although he did start out as a superhero). You're right though, "super" is generally not used for villains but there is a flaw in your argument. Superman is not called 'Superman' because "super" denotes goodness (in fact, the first version of the character that Siegel and Schuster created was a villain). It's the other way around: the prefix' 'super-' has become associated with superheroes because of Superman. 🤓

Originally posted by: Kal El

There is Super-Skrull (a Marvel Comics supervillain) and Superboy-Prime (a DC Comics supervillain, although he did start out as a superhero). You're right though, "super" is generally not used for villains but there is a flaw in your argument. Superman is not called 'Superman' because "super" denotes goodness (in fact, the first version of the character that Siegel and Schuster created was a villain). It's the other way around: the prefix' 'super-' has become associated with superheroes because of Superman. 🤓

YAY!! SO HAPPY WITH THIS NEWS!!