Female SUPERSTAR after Madz/Sri-Kat or Bebo?

Frequent Posters

Antlers

@Antlers

Sparkler

Posted: 14 years ago

#11

lol ppl defending their own favs and naming their own favs. get over it. they aren't that worthy. they do one great film and rest are crap. i bet their crap jab is full at the top right about now. lol

Quote

.khoobsurat.

@.khoobsurat.

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Salma2
who has the charma or being an era owner like madz and sri..

they were so appealing to people.

if I have to pick some one has that connect currently, it's katrina. But she is not close to people and she doesnt have that charisma. But cinematic ally this girl has some thing, thats why she sustains.

I agree Maduri and Sri had charm...I don't see that with Katrina. But I heard that Maduri doesn't even have that many hits. Most of her films were hits because of the actors.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

623577

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: beboholic

I agree Maduri and Sri had charm...I don't see that with Katrina. But I heard that Maduri doesn't even have that many hits. Most of her films were hits because of the actors.

the film 'RAJA' which launched Sanjay Kapoor became a hit only because of madhuri...'her aankhiyaan milaaon annkhiyan churaon' song brought a huge opening just like sheila ki jawani .. and madhuri performed superbly in tht film...the media at tht time gone mad and claimed her 'female AMITABH BACCHAN' of bollywood...this went agaiinst her as after this most of her films flopped nd finally she got on top again with 'dil toh pagal hai'.

but i can understand tht today's generation don't consider madhuri a star as she is not working and giving hits...but an indian woman in bollywood has limitations and men doesnt have ttht...also here women lose with male following just after marriage before it, they are seen as lust objects... BOLLYWOOD REALLY SUCKS when it comes to women...🤢