Pratigya refuse to follow Krishna...WHY? - Page 2

All that walking n running behind Krishna...She sprained her legs ...'so she could not follow him..

Or may be bec she is a contemporary woman , refused to walk behind him , said will walk by his side..

itni jaldi manipulate ho ke without knowing the whole truth n just forgetting all his mom's thinking n her misbehaves wat she did to Pratigya!apni wife ko ghar se n apni life se nikaalne was a big big wrong decision taken by Krishna ! now he will hav to suffer dis result of is mistake n try to console his wife dat he will trust her forever n not insult her in future!

Originally posted by: yemi3006

from a track point of view... Ganga's entry to TN is non of her business so CVs found a way to keep her away (for now) else they run the risk of making her come across as interferring, or uncaring towards her own relationship with her hubby because we all know that she's not one to stand quietly by and not involve herself when she sees this innocent girl being fed to the wolves

... also, I want to believe that the days of P being the moral compass for K are numbered as he's going to start making these decisions himself without her having to point out / explain what is wrong or right.

From a relationship point of view... its can't happen so soon else it will look as if there's no lessons learned.

yes it was due to manipulations, but lots of hurtfull stuff was said by Krishna. He needs to come to terms with what his mother did to him, what his mother did to his wife, and most importantly, what he did to the love of his life. Krishna has to remember than nothing good comes too easily.

Besides who would want to go back to that jungle right away? Even if her mate resides there, he's not the alpha lion and can't provide 24/7 security.

Originally posted by: riyya6

In my opinion, yes Pratigya has the right to be angry with Krishna about what that has happened in their r/ship...

Bt she is aware it is not Krishna's fault as well... AMMAJI has manipulated well... So, why is she refusing to go with Krishna... (sbb segment)

And if trust is the issue, yes Krishna was at fault of not trusting her, but situation was such... And now things are cleared, why Pratigya is refusing to go with Krishna...

Im confused... 😕

wats there to be confused abt? krishna was willing to divorce her wizout giving her a chance to prove her innocence... sure he was angry.. bt he was also ready to throw away their relationship... he didnt believe for once she might be innocent..

This is how I see it. So far she has stood infront of the window, begged Krishna to listen to her etc.. coz she wanted to save her marriage and wanted her husband back. So now she has him. Why the games now?

Originally posted by: tanthya

All that walking n running behind Krishna...She sprained her legs ...'so she could not follow him..

Or may be bec she is a contemporary woman , refused to walk behind him , said will walk by his side..

Nice...😉

Originally posted by: carisma2

Nice...😉

Dat's confusing how she is not following him to TN, Or should I expect this to be the 'H' sax trait, To say one thing and do another.

If she chased him for weeks, she accomplished her mission, so why the two- standard games now? It should have been either/or...

She should have been stronger and told him where to go a few weeks ago... why now?

MMFG accomodation is surely faciliated and tailored to her needs. 😕

Caris Dear..

HRU Now ?? getting rare to see u nowadays ...


well, I would say , she has proved her point ..so now it is Krishna to understand the seriousness of relationship..to understand the impact of words ...one cannot expect him to say , Get out of my life and expect the wife to come behind meekly when he goes to call..He has to understand that relationship is built by 2 and cannot be run only on his diktat...that has not come about yet !!

There was the necessity of proving her innocence..

Originally posted by: tanthya

Caris Dear..

HRU Now ?? getting rare to see u nowadays ...


well, I would say , she has proved her point ..so now it is Krishna to understand the seriousness of relationship..to understand the impact of words ...one cannot expect him to say , Get out of my life and expect the wife to come behind meekly when he goes to call..He has to understand that relationship is built by 2 and cannot be run only on his diktat...that has not come about yet !!

There was the necessity of proving her innocence..

Originally posted by: riyya6

In my opinion, yes Pratigya has the right to be angry with Krishna about what that has happened in their r/ship...

Bt she is aware it is not Krishna's fault as well... AMMAJI has manipulated well... So, why is she refusing to go with Krishna... (sbb segment)

And if trust is the issue, yes Krishna was at fault of not trusting her, but situation was such... And now things are cleared, why Pratigya is refusing to go with Krishna...

Im confused... 😕