Two Takdeer ki Topis..? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

1.1k

Users

10

Likes

10

Frequent Posters

Naughtynatty thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#11
Thats a nice idea !!
I mean only if they could consider it sigh !!
Dabulls23 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#12
JC my dear having two winners have nothing to do with girls backing off or they are any less than boys...
Why compare to begin with? Each have their own strengths and weaknesses....God made them the way they are....Or else god would have made only one gender...If Indian viewers were not so gender biased than we would not be discussing this....
If janta was voting on talent and talent only than having one winner is the right thing...But Indian janta votes for everything else than abt talent.... We are emotional voters 😳
-JC- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#13
But if you want that janta to change such a podium is required to show the janta its true face so they'll see what they are doing wrong and make amends.. change doesn't come by accepting what is wrong it comes by facing it and demanding a change.
|Persephone| thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 16 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: -JC-

No I don't think it should be divided that way. Because girls have worked very hard to show that they are no less than boys but just because a population still doesn't see it that way and votes based on gender biases doesn't mean the girls should step back and allow that divide. Alisha last year proved that she was not less than any boy who were equally talented. But i don't agree with shoving that up to India's gender bias. Because to think of it Jay was equally talented as Salman and Alisha and he too didn't get voted the best. The point is that at the top 3 if any one of them had won, i'd have said its a good choice because all three were of the same caliber. And being able to say that Alisha a girl was of the same and equal dancing talent as the two guys is an achievement rather than something to be upset about because she wasn't given the #1 positon.. because even Jay the boy didn't get the #1 position tho he was just as deserving as Alisha or Salman.

The point is that there could be only one winner but today we are discussing about Alisha because she gave a good competition to the boys. If the dance had been divided we wouldn't be putting Alisha in league with the boys. So i think its better that the competition has given girls and boys and equal chance at winning their takdeer ki topi without showing any gender bias. Agar gender bias hai toh its in the ppl who may not be voting for Alisha because she is a girl but you cna't be sure that everyone who didn't vote for her did it because she is a girl. Because lets face it she did get up to top 3... which she deserved.

So no i like the current format and would like it to continue that way. Besides, i feel that unlike singing competitions, dancing doesn't divide between female and male forms. Guys can be equally graceful as girls and girls can be equally energetic as guys. So there is no reason to divide.

totally agree... cudn't have said it better... i think the format is fine the way it is and one winner is how it should be rather than dividing the genders!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".