AGNI PAREEKSHA - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

33

Views

2.9k

Users

11

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#31
Dear Cool Purvi, I've been reading this debate for awhile now, and I think everyone is presenting a good point. As for your original article, I think it's very nice and you did a wonderful job spreading the message! However, the debate about Chaya Sita or not, I really don't know what to say, because it could be correct or not. As for me, I would like to think it was the real Sita kidnapped, because like someone said, it makes it seem like Ram really suffered, as per Lord Vishnu's curse. Don't get me wrong, I don't enjoy the suffering part, as I'm not a sadistic, but I'm just saying that it would sound more (what's the word) romantic? No, that's not the right word for a purana, but you know what I mean. However, it is written in the Adhyatma Ramayana, that the Chaya Sita story is true. And this is the reasoning for it according to that book...
Ram knew that if Ravan really touched Sita when kidnapping her, his hands would burn off, so he asked Agnidev to keep Sita safe with him unitl Ravan was killed. And the whole point of AgniPariksha was to get the real Sita back. However, as some people ask why Ram just didn't do it in private, the reasoning is that he also wanted to prove Sita's chastity in front of people. Other than himself, Sita, and Lakshman, no one knew that the real Sita didn't get kidnapped, and even if Ram did tell them, would people have believed him? Okay, let's say they did believe him, but then they would know he was God, and that would contradict the purpose of his avatar. So...he made everyone believe Chaya Sita was the real Sita, and so the Agni Pariksha to everyone else seemed like a test of purity for Sita, when in fact it was only to reclaim the real Sita.
This is what it says in the Adhyatma Ramayana. I don't know which one is true, but isn't the gist of the story the same?
Anyway, I have just one doubt. I read in the Adhyatma Ramayana, that when the real Sita was reclaimed, Chaya Sita, who was an incarnation of Mayadevi, came to Ram in private and asked him to marry her, since she had posed as his wife for one year. However, Ram said he couldn't in this life, because he had made a vow to have only one wife. Instead, he granted her a boon saying he would marry her in his next life as Shri Krishna. So when he became Shri Krishna and Sita became Rukmini, Chaya Sita became Satyabhama.
But all these puranas are so confusing, because in another book, I read that the first 8 wives of Shri Krishna were incarnations of Goddess Lakshmi. So I guess that means Mayadevi is also an incarnation of Lakshmi. Grrr, this is so confusing! Anyway, Great Article!
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#32
But dont like the Chaya Sita concept it shows Sita as weak woman. According to it she actually didnt face the problem rather a illusion face the problem. My view is that Sita doesnt need protection from or protection of AgniDev. For me Real sita faced Ravan.n her satitva protected her there n not any miracle or Agnidev. Pupose of her incarnation was to show us a ideal women who bravely faced hardships. Illusion sita concept diminishes her greateness.
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#33
This is wht Lord Ram said after agnipareeksha

'Twas meet that mid the thousands here
The searching fire my queen should clear;
For long within the giant's bower
She dwelt the vassal of his power.
For else had many a slanderous tongue
Reproaches on mine honour flung,
And scorned the king who, love-impelled,
His consort from the proof withheld.
No doubt had I, but surely knew
That Janak's child was pure and true,
That, come what might, in good and ill
Her faithful heart was with me still.
I knew that Ravan could not wrong
Mv queen whom virtue made so strong.
I knew his heart would sink and fail,
Nor dare her honour to assail,
As Ocean, when he raves and roars.
Fears to o'erleap his bounding shores.
Now to the worlds her truth is shown,
And Sita is again mine own.

Thus proved before unnumbered eyes,
On her pure fame no shadow lies.

As heroes to their glory cleave,
Mine own dear spouse I ne'er will leave.'
He ceased: and clasped in fond embrace
On his dear breast she hid her face.
Edited by coolpurvi - 16 years ago
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: coolpurvi

This is wht Lord Ram said after agnipareeksha

'Twas meet that mid the thousands here
The searching fire my queen should clear;
For long within the giant's bower
She dwelt the vassal of his power.
For else had many a slanderous tongue
Reproaches on mine honour flung,
And scorned the king who, love-impelled,
His consort from the proof withheld.
No doubt had I, but surely knew
That Janak's child was pure and true,
That, come what might, in good and ill
Her faithful heart was with me still.
I knew that Ravan could not wrong
Mv queen whom virtue made so strong.
I knew his heart would sink and fail,
Nor dare her honour to assail,
As Ocean, when he raves and roars.
Fears to o'erleap his bounding shores.
Now to the worlds her truth is shown,
And Sita is again mine own.

Thus proved before unnumbered eyes,
On her pure fame no shadow lies.

As heroes to their glory cleave,
Mine own dear spouse I ne'er will leave.'
He ceased: and clasped in fond embrace
On his dear breast she hid her face.

This is a nice passage. From which book is it? I would look to read it. 😳

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".